2009 DAT

[dh03]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Hey guys, not sure if this was answered before but I have a question regarding the official 2009 DAT.
For anyone who has recently taken the DAT and the 09 practice test, do you guys think it was a good representation in terms of what to accept, especially the QR section?

Its just that I recently took it, did well in all sections except QR, which has me really worried since its my weakest area and my exam is in a week. Some of the questions like the eclipse ones I thought were extremely difficult to do. Also, is achiever good for QR or should I just practice with math destroyer?

Any suggestions/advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

 

[mvam]

i always heard that achiever is above and beyond in difficulty. thoroughly studying math destroyer should be enough, and even that is harder than most of the stuff on the dat. i took it yesterday and nothing was too over the top in difficulty. the hardest part is doing everything in a timely fashion. if you see an ellipsces that is too hard skip it and come back at the end because in all likely hood you'll run out of time. math was the only section where i ran out of time.

 

[Endo2021]

Everything was easier in 2009 in my experience. I actually only used that and DAT Boot camp to study (the free version) and I would say DAT Boot camp is very much representative of the actual test. I would definitely give that website a look.

 

[dh03]

Thanks!