2011 AOA Match Data

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
DO Class of 2010 = 4,228 students.

Out of those 4,228,
2,045 students opted for the match.
1,444 students match ACGME.
71% match

The number you want is
1,444 students match
4,228 students existed

34% of DO students matched into the ACGME match for the class of 2010.

Let's not forget that the 2045 number is those who register for the NRMP match. Those who register for both NRMP and AOA but match AOA are withdrawn from the NRMP. This would make the match rate of DOs in the NRMP even higher, since the withdrawn candidates were no longer eligible for the match (so actually less than 2045 eligible for the NRMP). And as mentioned before, many DOs prematch into ACGME programs.
 
I still maintain what I said b-4, for those wanting to go into an ACGME residency....


The 90% or greater chance for graduates from big-4 carib. program (Ross, AUC, Saba, SGU) have of getting an ACGME spot is a heck of a lot better than the 34% for graduates from DO schools.

ehh.... ahh....my head.... it hurts.... cant.... compute.... abuse of stats.... eeeeaaaaaaaaaaagggggggggggggghhhhhhhhh

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA[/YOUTUBE]
 
Omg. This is too funny.

I could even go further. For graduates from Big-4 Carib. programs who finished without any major red flags (no failed classes, no failed Usmle exams, no interuptions in training, reasonably ok clinical evaluations), the rate for getting ACGME residency spots is closer to 95-99%, compared to 34% for DO.

This really is no laughing matter.......
 
What's funny is how daft you are, assuming you are not a troll.
 
I still maintain what I said b-4, for those wanting to go into an ACGME residency....


The 90% or greater chance for graduates from big-4 carib. program (Ross, AUC, Saba, SGU) have of getting an ACGME spot is a heck of a lot better than the 34% for graduates from DO schools.

Can you provide evidence for the 90%, by the way? You keep saying that, but do you have facts or numbers?

And again, the 34% is how many are in ACGME residencies, not how many tried to get in. If all 4500 DO students TRIED to get an ACGME residency, and only 34% succeeded, then you'd have a tremendous argument. As it stands, you do not. Why would someone who has a great chance at, say, ortho/neurosurg/ent/urology in the AOA match even bother with the ACGME match? And for those who want to do general FM or IM, and not specialize, what difference does it make? Others still will go into dual-accredited residencies in ER, IM, FM, etc, and these don't count towards that misleading 34%.

Come on...at least try to play fair.
 
I could even go further. For graduates from Big-4 Carib. programs who finished without any major red flags (no failed classes, no failed Usmle exams, no interuptions in training, reasonably ok clinical evaluations), the rate for getting ACGME residency spots is closer to 95-99%, compared to 34% for DO.

This really is no laughing matter.......

But you, sir, are.

You have no data to back up these claims. There's no doubt many from the Big 4 get into a residency. How many of them did it on the first try? How many had to decel or failed out before you got to this magnificent class with the near perfect match rate (which is somehow better than LCME MD match rates...amazing!).

You really think a DO student with no failed classes, no failed USMLE or COMLEX, and reasonable okay clinical evals is going to have a 34% shot of an ACGME residency? Is this truly what you believe?

(See guys, I knew we should have ended this thread long ago. It's just going to downhill from here)
 
Can you provide evidence for the 90%, by the way? You keep saying that, but do you have facts or numbers?

And again, the 34% is how many are in ACGME residencies, not how many tried to get in. If all 4500 DO students TRIED to get an ACGME residency, and only 34% succeeded, then you'd have a tremendous argument. As it stands, you do not. Why would someone who has a great chance at, say, ortho/neurosurg/ent/urology in the AOA match even bother with the ACGME match? And for those who want to do general FM or IM, and not specialize, what difference does it make? Others still will go into dual-accredited residencies in ER, IM, FM, etc, and these don't count towards that misleading 34%.

Come on...at least try to play fair.

Ok I will concede that you have a point, but on an equal level, you also have to acknoledge that suggesting, as members of this forum have suggested, that a student who graduates from my school only has a 50% chance of obtaining an ACGME residency by lumping data from my school with schools that have a worse record is also unfair.

Now that I have shown that I can 'play' with the numbers as well as some members here, perhaps both sides of this discussion can agree that it would be more appropriate to approach this discussion in a more dignified manner.
 
Feeding trolls is fun, but counterproductive.

If you check out DrFraud's threads/comments on ValueMD you'll see they're of a similar tone.

I remind everyone to please think of the kittens.
 
How did this become a DO vs. Caribbean thread? Aye... *smacks head* 🙄

I think it has something to do with the first statment written by the OP in this thread.





QUOTE=HockeyDr09;10844335]There have been a lot of threads lately regarding the match rates of D.O's compared to M.D's/Carib M.D's. [/QUOTE
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Ok I will concede that you have a point, but on an equal level, you also have to acknoledge that suggesting, as members of this forum have suggested, that a student who graduates from my school only has a 50% chance of obtaining an ACGME residency by lumping data from my school with schools that have a worse record is also unfair.

Now that I have shown that I can 'play' with the numbers as well as some members here, perhaps both sides of this discussion can agree that it would be more appropriate to approach this discussion in a more dignified manner.

Well 50% of the applicants is actually true for all US students in foreign schools. But the big 4 bring that up. There is no doubt. I think you are (accidentally or purposefully) confounding that figure (which we have linked to and backed up as correct) with the other fact that only 55% of *an entering class* from AUC will get an ACGME residency. Which was also cited and backed up. The former is a comment on the training of people who pass the pre-clinicals. No one is challenging the big four can create people who go to clinicals and are competent, though some may argue the carib as a whole clearly isn't doing a good job. The latter argues that the system you are put into is clearly doing something wrong as 45% of the class is failing out in one way or another (since it can be assumed the same amount decellerate each year, the decelerating ins match the decelerating outs and deceleration is functionally invisible in stat analysis. Only flunk outs and non-ACGME residency holders count in that 45%). This means that either your school is accepting people who have no business being there (Along side those who do) or they are weeding people out for the sake of some greater goal.

Either way, please don't confound the two stats. We understand you wish to deal only with the stats of graduates who have already "passed" the schooling aspect of education. But don't pluck comments out of context and put them into a new context.
 
Ok I will concede that you have a point, but on an equal level, you also have to acknoledge that suggesting, as members of this forum have suggested, that a student who graduates from my school only has a 50% chance of obtaining an ACGME residency by lumping data from my school with schools that have a worse record is also unfair.

Now that I have shown that I can 'play' with the numbers as well as some members here, perhaps both sides of this discussion can agree that it would be more appropriate to approach this discussion in a more dignified manner.

For the fourth time (yes the fourth time between this and the other thread.)



American University of the Caribbean 2010 Match Data

Anesthesiology - 1
Emergency Medicine - 11
Family Practice - 46
General Surgery - 4
Internal Medicine - 59
Neurology - 3
OB/GYN - 12
Pathology - 1
Pediatrics - 16
Prelim Medicine - 9
Prelim Surgery - 6
Psychiatry Residency - 12
Radiology - 2
Traditional Year - 5
Total 187

~340 students start a year. They have three start dates, January, May, and September. I am trying to find concrete evidence showing their actual enrollment numbers, but they virtually impossible to find.
55% Match

DMU-COM Class of 2010

Anesthesiology - 9
Emergency Medicine - 26
Family Medicine - 43
Internal Medicine - 30
Medicine-Preliminary - 6
Neurology - 4
Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine - OMT 1
Obstetrics - Gynecology - 14
Ophthalmology - 4
Otolaryngology - 1
Pathology -3
Pediatrics -16
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation - 10
Psychiatry - 9
Radiology - Diagnostic - 3
Surgery - General - 6
Surgery - Neurological - 1
Surgery - Orthopaedic - 6
Surgery - Otolaryn & Facial Plastic - 2
Traditional Rotating Internship - 7

Total Students - 201
Started with ~212

95% Match

One start date.




You have not acknowledged this once.
 
I think you are (accidentally or purposefully) confounding that figure (which we have linked to and backed up as correct) with the other fact that only 55% of *an entering class* from AUC will get an ACGME residency.

This is where you are mistaken, and you guilty of offering misleading data.



There are two ways AUC students obain ACGME residency spots. The first is through the match, and the second is by signing contracts outside of the match. Most of the students who graduate from my school (and programs like Ross, SGU, and Saba) secure a position at an ACGME residency program. For those who have NO red flags, the rate is likely 95-99%.

These graduates will be able to practice in all 50 states, (without having to petition the ACGME).
 
Ok I will concede that you have a point, but on an equal level, you also have to acknoledge that suggesting, as members of this forum have suggested, that a student who graduates from my school only has a 50% chance of obtaining an ACGME residency by lumping data from my school with schools that have a worse record is also unfair.

Now that I have shown that I can 'play' with the numbers as well as some members here, perhaps both sides of this discussion can agree that it would be more appropriate to approach this discussion in a more dignified manner.

I totally agree with you. The Big 4 does not include Windsor, AUA, or Destiny (seriously). The match rates for the Big 4 are likely much, much higher than the rest of the Carib schools, but there's no clear data. The credibility of the Big 4 schools have been brought down by the smaller schools as well as by the massive entering class sizes, with multiple semesters.

SGU, for example, accepted 500+ students this past January alone. How are they going to get their clinical spots, NYC is going to run out eventually. For the 2011 match, ~520 got a spot (including pre-match), out of an entering class of ~720, if the quoted numbers from students at VMD are right. And some of those matches were from previous graduates, but there's no way to tell. Now, the schools don't release data, so we don't know how many matched first-time, how many decelled, how many entered the match. (I have no data with AUC, easier to find SGU data)
 
Omg. This is too funny.

The convoluted are pretty convoluted. But seriously he won't listen to anyone. He for some reason neglects to understand that the AOA match occurs earlier and if you match ( of which many do) you even if you're competitive for ACGME residencies will not be able to apply. The people who then completely neglect the AOA match match 70% of the time.

More so I'll humor the notion that SGU has a 90% match rate ( It doesn't), this data alone tells us very little. Sure it represents some statistical significance ( With low power), but that's all. You should ask where these residents are going and what is the quality of these residencies. It also doesn't tell us whether or not Carib applicants applied primarily to the worst residencies of which haven't had a US graduate in ever or whether or not.

So.. the fundamentally there isn't enough data/information to even be arguing anything here. Secondly Fraud's data is all anecdotal and out of his ass.. and along with that.. it is from a theoretically refined sample of applicants. So hey.. 10 applicants with 250+ Step 1's v.s 4000 applicants with a distribution and lurking variables which he doesn't even want to acknowledge is going to give you.. 'statistically significant' results.
 
This is where you are mistaken, and you guilty of offering misleading data.



There are two ways AUC students obain ACGME residency spots. The first is through the match, and the second is by signing contracts outside of the match. Most of the students who graduate from my school (and programs like Ross, SGU, and Saba) secure a position at an ACGME residency program. For those who have NO red flags, the rate is likely 95-99%.

These graduates will be able to practice in all 50 states, (without having to petition the ACGME).

This is where you are mistaken. The 55% match includes students who prematched and signed contracts outside of the match. If you had actually looked at my citations (or read any of my posts for that matter) you would have seen that my citation was NOT from the NRMP. It was actually from AUC's site, where they state

AUC said:
American University of the Caribbean graduates have obtained residencies in traditionally highly competitive fields and many report having been offered a choice of residency positions by the time they graduate. Below you will find a list of the positions that have been reported to us by the NRMP (and a few placements outside of the match reported to us directly from our graduates). Please note that this is not a complete list and will be updated as more positions (pre-match and post-match "scramble") are reported to us. Please remember to complete the online Residency Placement Survey. Results directly affect the university's accreditation, value of your medical degree and serve as a valuable resource for future graduates.

Now before you jump and say that all the students have not reported yet. This data is from the 2010 match. Over a year ago. The data is in. 55%.
 
SGU, for example, accepted 500+ students this past January alone. For the 2011 match, ~520 got a spot (including pre-match), out of an entering class of ~720, if the quoted numbers from students at VMD are right. And some of those matches were from previous graduates, but there's no way to tell. Now, the schools don't release data, so we don't know how many matched first-time, how many decelled, how many entered the match.

I agree, the number is too large, and I would not recommend attending Ross or SGU over smaller programs like AUC and Saba. Both AUC and Saba have environments in my opinion that is much more conducive to learning.
 
Last edited:
Now before you jump and say that all the students have not reported yet. This data is from the 2010 match. Over a year ago. The data is in. 55%.

I attend this school. I would not have attended this program, nor would I recomend this program if the success rate for securing ACGME residencies was only 55%.

Your data is incorrect.
 
This is where you are mistaken, and you guilty of offering misleading data.



There are two ways AUC students obain ACGME residency spots. The first is through the match, and the second is by signing contracts outside of the match. Most of the students who graduate from my school (and programs like Ross, SGU, and Saba) secure a position at an ACGME residency program. For those who have NO red flags, the rate is likely 95-99%.

These graduates will be able to practice in all 50 states, (without having to petition the ACGME).

AUC's list, which is updated live, includes the pre-match agreements. In this one sense I know your school better than you do. Thus why I never used the word match, i said that they got an ACGME residency.

Edit: the reasoning behind my use of the word "live" was i watched the list on their website for 2011 matches go from 10ish to 20ish to 30ish in the days leading up to the ACGME match and then jump to the full amount in the week after the match
 
This is where you are mistaken, and you guilty of offering misleading data.



There are two ways AUC students obain ACGME residency spots. The first is through the match, and the second is by signing contracts outside of the match. Most of the students who graduate from my school (and programs like Ross, SGU, and Saba) secure a position at an ACGME residency program. For those who have NO red flags, the rate is likely 95-99%.

These graduates will be able to practice in all 50 states, (without having to petition the ACGME).

It's the AOA that the ACGME trained DOs need to send their petitions to, not ACGME.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
AUC's list, which is updated live, includes the pre-match agreements. In this one sense I know your school better than you do. Thus why I never used the word match, i said that they got an ACGME residency.

As I have said, for those graduates without a red flag from my school, the rate for securing ACGME residency positions is likely over 95-99%. For the entire class, including those with Red flags, the rate of securing ACGME spots is likely > 88%. I dont have anything more concret to give you, this is my best approximation, but this really isn't too far off from the actual number.

The big take away point is that for someone who wants an ACGME residency, and is confident that they can graduate without any Red flags, they have a virtural sure thing of matching into an ACGME residency if they attend and graduate from the school that I attended.

The 47% rate that members are floating around here simply is not an accurate number.



and for those wanting to specialize......the take home point is that the best way to have a good chance at specializing is to go to an LCME U.S. MD program. Alternative programs, such as DO, U.S. IMG, etc are always going to be much more of a crap shoot. Sure, DOs will say they have a better shot, but there have been many IMG MDs who also landed great specialties too, so someone interested in specializing is much much better off using their precious brain energy to devote to rocking the MCAT vs. trying to figure out if DO or IMG MD offers the better probability of getting a specialty.
 
Last edited:
As I have said, for those graduates without a red flag from my school, the rate for securing ACGME residency positions is likely over 95-99%. For the entire class, including those with Red flags, the rate of securing ACGME spots is likely > 88%. I dont have anything more concret to give you, this is my best approximation, but this really isn't too far off from the actual number.

The big take away point is that for someone who wants an ACGME residency, and is confident that they can graduate without any Red flags, they have a virtural sure thing of matching into an ACGME residency if they attend and graduate from the school that I attended.

The 47% rate that members are floating around here simply is not an accurate number.

Source?
 
Well I know people now how are pgy-1 osteopath residents who said they did it (AOA transition year) only because of the 5 state issue, so why would they be doing this if it was only a paperwork issue. Are they misinformed too?

In a word, yes. Everyone knows about resolution 42. I'm an MD student and even I know about resolution 42.
 
What's funny is how daft you are, assuming you are not a troll.

Oh, he's definitely a troll...one who's been reported now.
 
Ok I will concede that you have a point, but on an equal level, you also have to acknoledge that suggesting, as members of this forum have suggested, that a student who graduates from my school only has a 50% chance of obtaining an ACGME residency by lumping data from my school with schools that have a worse record is also unfair.

Now that I have shown that I can 'play' with the numbers as well as some members here, perhaps both sides of this discussion can agree that it would be more appropriate to approach this discussion in a more dignified manner.

Ah, now the truth comes out. Looks like someone's bitter about being rejected from DO schools.
 
:idea::idea::idea::idea::idea::idea::idea:
👍

(read the whole thread)

P.S: I love to see the residents stepping in and dropping the hammer.

Point is, that you can't count that total # towards the match, if all 4228 or whatever didn't participate in the match.

It's a 71% match rate (which is still not entirely accurate given prematches), not 34%.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I still can't believe Fraud is rehashing his foolishness in a second thread. All your arguments are moot until you can present solid evidence. Didn't they teach you this at your caribbean MD school? Anyway. Let's just remember the kittens.
 
I still can't believe Fraud is rehashing his foolishness in a second thread. All your arguments are moot until you can present solid evidence. Didn't they teach you this at your caribbean MD school? Anyway. Let's just remember the kittens.

It really is quite silly. He even went so far as to say in the other thread that he shouldn't be expected to keep data in his back pocket because he's not insecure like the rest of us on the DO track.

Seriously though, whatever. He's one guy spewing nothing but conjecture. The data is there, it's easy to understand, and the reality is clear. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with DO vs caribbean schools. Who cares, really? Are DO schools equivalent to stateside MD schools? No, there are certainly differences. Are DOs considered equivalent to MDs once certified? Yes. Will hard working DOs be able to get into a specialized field? The data clearly states yes! After that, who cares one way or another?
 
So DrFraud matched where again?
 
As I have said, for those graduates without a red flag from my school, the rate for securing ACGME residency positions is likely over 95-99%. For the entire class, including those with Red flags, the rate of securing ACGME spots is likely > 88%. I dont have anything more concret to give you, this is my best approximation, but this really isn't too far off from the actual number.

The big take away point is that for someone who wants an ACGME residency, and is confident that they can graduate without any Red flags, they have a virtural sure thing of matching into an ACGME residency if they attend and graduate from the school that I attended.

The 47% rate that members are floating around here simply is not an accurate number.

and for those wanting to specialize......the take home point is that the best way to have a good chance at specializing is to go to an LCME U.S. MD program. Alternative programs, such as DO, U.S. IMG, etc are always going to be much more of a crap shoot. Sure, DOs will say they have a better shot, but there have been many IMG MDs who also landed great specialties too, so someone interested in specializing is much much better off using their precious brain energy to devote to rocking the MCAT vs. trying to figure out if DO or IMG MD offers the better probability of getting a specialty.

This is going to be a LONG post, and I will be updating my first post with much of the data I am about to include. I would really appreciate (it took me awhile to write this) EVERYONE considering between DO schools or Caribbean schools to read this post in its entirety and to view the statistics as objectively as possible.



This debate is about which pathway (Caribbean or DO) offers you a better chance at landing a residency, and becoming a board certified physician.

First, we will start with all DO schools vs all Caribbean Schools (US-IMG'S in some of these stats). Then, we will take a look at AUC (Upper level Caribbean) vs a specific DO school (DMU, Upper Level DO)


All DO vs Caribbean

I have taken the time to compile data directly from the NRMP and from the AOA match

This data lists how many DO's matched in both the ACGME and the AOA match and compares it to Caribbean grads who matched ACGME. (Caribbean grads cannot participate in the AOA match)

I have bolded which of the two options has matched more students.

Specialty

PGY-1 Positions

Anesthesiology
D.O 103
U.S IMG 23


Dermatology
D.O 26
U.S IMG 0

Emergency Medicine
D.O 375
U.S IMG 109

Emergency Med/Family Med
D.O 10
U.S IMG 1

Family Medicine
D.O 656
U.S IMG 439

Internal Medicine (Categorical)
D.O 609
U.S IMG 460

Neurological Surgery
D.O 12
U.S IMG 3

Neurology
D.O 31
U.S IMG 20

Obstetrics-Gynecology
D.O 173
U.S IMG 76

Orthopedic Surgery
D.O 87
U.S IMG 3

Otolaryngology
D.O 11
U.S IMG 1

Pathology
D.O 31
U.S IMG 31


Pediatrics
D.O 251
U.S IMG 147

Physical Medicine & Rehab
D.O 18
U.S IMG 9

Plastic Surgery (Integrated)
D.O 11
U.S IMG 0

Psychiatry (Categorical)
D.O 132
U.S IMG 129

Radiology-Diagnostic
D.O 32
U.S IMG 4

Surgery (Categorical)
D.O 122
U.S IMG 51

Surgery-Preliminary (PGY-1 Only)
D.O 19
U.S IMG 81

Transitional (PGY-1 Only)
D.O 267
U.S IMG 33

Urology
D.O 19
U.S IMG 0

There are more D.O's the U.S IMG's in 19 of 21 specialties, and 1 specialty had the same amount. This does not take into account the attrition rates for either the Caribbean or DO schools. The Caribbean has a notoriously high attrition rate, but we'll get back to that later.

Here is some more data. This is ONLY from the MD match, there were another 1600 DO's that matched in the AOA match.

Active Applicants
DO = 2,045
US IMG = 3,695

Matched
DO = 1,444
US IMG = 1,749

Unmatched
DO = 601
US IMG = 1,946

Matching %
DO = 70%
US IMG = 47%

Of the US IMG's that made it through medical school, 1,946 of them didn't even match. This does not even take into consideration how many Caribbean grads didn't make it through the curriculum.



That data along with consideration of attrition rates, and my previous posts in the thread about Dual Certified AOA residencies, should put to rest ANY discussion of DO vs Caribbean MD for residency placement. If you would rather have the MD initials, then go for it. Just take into consideration the facts listed above.



Now, solely for Dr. Frauds sake, we can discuss the matter of a top Caribbean vs a top DO.

This is Dr. Frauds argument

As I have said, for those graduates without a red flag from my school, the rate for securing ACGME residency positions is likely over 95-99%. For the entire class, including those with Red flags, the rate of securing ACGME spots is likely > 88%. I dont have anything more concret to give you, this is my best approximation, but this really isn't too far off from the actual number.


Dr. Fraud believes that graduates from his school (AUC), who graduate "without a red flag" have match rates of 95%-99%. His sole shred of evidence for this statistic, is that he attends there currently.

My evidence is listed below



American University of the Caribbean 2010 Match Data

Anesthesiology - 1
Emergency Medicine - 11
Family Practice - 46
General Surgery - 4
Internal Medicine - 59
Neurology - 3
OB/GYN - 12
Pathology - 1
Pediatrics - 16
Prelim Medicine - 9
Prelim Surgery - 6
Psychiatry Residency - 12
Radiology - 2
Traditional Year - 5
Total 187

~340 students start a year. They have three start dates, January, May, and September. I am trying to find concrete evidence showing their actual enrollment numbers, but they virtually impossible to find.
55% Match



Roughly 340 students start each year at AUC, at different times of the year (Either January, May, September). AUC refuses to list class sizes on their website. My investigations at ValueMD show that the number is actually much closer to 380, but I will lowball the number to give Dr. Fraud the benefit of the doubt.

Of the 340 students that start the program each year, only ~187 match. ~153 students either: A) Drop out in debt or B) Did not match and will have reapply / strengthen their applications with more coursework (additional degrees) or additional research. Dr. Fraud has mentioned that the students who enter AUC who are "confident that they will graduate from their respective program" will match without a problem "95%-99%" of the time. According to this logic the 153 students that didn't make it must have not been confident that they would graduate the program. Do you honestly believe almost half the class that started medical school at AUC were not confident, and felt that they probably weren't going to make it? This IS AUC's data. I am not playing or manipulating the numbers. Their match list is from their site (it's cited) and it was updated to include students who pre-matched / found residencies through another method. You must also take into consideration that many students do NOT match on their first try going through the Caribbean (evidenced by the fact that 1,946 didn't match this year). This means it's impossible to tell how many of the 187 AUC matching students actually matched on their first try.

The above example is why attrition rates are extremely important, and SHOULD be factored into you decision of attending DO or Caribbean MD.

Now to compare AUC's data with a DO school


DMU-COM Class of 2010

Anesthesiology - 9
Emergency Medicine - 26
Family Medicine - 43
Internal Medicine - 30
Medicine-Preliminary - 6
Neurology - 4
Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine - OMT 1
Obstetrics - Gynecology - 14
Ophthalmology - 4
Otolaryngology - 1
Pathology -3
Pediatrics -16
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation - 10
Psychiatry - 9
Radiology - Diagnostic - 3
Surgery - General - 6
Surgery - Neurological - 1
Surgery - Orthopaedic - 6
Surgery - Otolaryn & Facial Plastic - 2
Traditional Rotating Internship - 7

Total Students - 201
Started with ~212

95% Match

One start date.

95% of the students that started the program finished. In my opinion their match list is much more impressive as well (This is up to your personal evaluation, but I think most would agree with me). 2 Plastics, 6 Ortho's, 4 Optha, and 1 Oto, is pretty impressive. AUC had 0 matches in all four of those fields.




Both schools can lead you down the pathway of becoming a board certified physician. With either path, you are going to have to do a ton of work. But, and for the last time, if you want to match in the United States, and hope to land in a competitve residency, in a competitve location, you should opt for a DO school over a Caribbean school. This is my opinion, but I did the best I could to use facts to support the argument. Choose wisely.




A note to Dr. Fraud-
As I said previously, I appreciate the fact that you show a different perspective to the forum. All I ask is you not quote 1 or 2 sentences from this post and create a baseless argument, that really is not about what this discussion is concerned with. If you decide to comment please construct a well thought out argument, and try and cite as much information as possible. This would make this thread far more constructive, and would really benefit future pre-meds.
 
Last edited:
Yo Dr. Fraud, I understand the inclination to defend your school here, however, you leave out some major points that pre-meds considering both routes should consider.

1) Any DO who graduates in good standing from a DO school can get an IM or FM spot in the ACGME match, no doubt. You and other IMGs should thank your lucky stars that AOA match, one you think is inferior, exists, or you guys would be so SOL. If more DOs applied to the primary care spots like the IMGs, no doubt they will win them over IMGs. The DO who didn't match in the ACGME match were probably going for competitive fields.

2) As a DO, you will definitely get a residency spot somewhere in some field, can you say that about IMGs? I think not. Please look up unfilled osteopathic spots. There are plenty of open primary care spots after AOA match, and even ACGME match that DOs can and do get. It may not be their first choice specialty, but hey, they have a job for next year and will be a licensed physician some day. IMGs can only wish they had a deal like that.

3) Matching into specialties is much easier as a DO. I won't even get into surgical subspecialties or derm where DOs obviously have a huge advantage through the AOA match. But lets entertain EM, Rads, and Anesthesiology. If you are a dead average, even below average DO student, you will get a spot in EM or Anesthesia somewhere in the US of A. Rads require you to be somewhat of a stud, but is very much doable with a 235+ on step I and 2. Can you say that coming out of AUC? I think not.

4) Also, ACGME residency seems to be the gold standard, I agree, but AOA residency doesn't mean a death sentence. You may not get a job at top academic centers or ivory towers, but you will make just as much as other docs in your field who did ACGME residencies. I challenge you to prove otherwise.

Please tell us what specialty you matched coming out of AUC, and what were your board scores like. And don't be telling us that you wanted to do FM or IM (if that is what you matched) to begin with even with your 230+ USMLE scores because we know that not true.
 
Point is, that you can't count that total # towards the match, if all 4228 or whatever didn't participate in the match.

It's a 71% match rate (which is still not entirely accurate given prematches), not 34%.

I 100% agree with you (which I why I said to read the thread).
 
Just stunning logical progressions by DrFraud.

Can you imagine him as a physician? "I'm sorry, I'm not going to prescribe you those antibiotics because it only helped 2 percent of the total population of the world improve in health. I know, I know, it helps 99 percent of people with your infection, but the stats don't lie."
 
HockeyDr, thank you for taking the time to compile all of the match information, I know it took time. I was disappointed to see this become nothing but a Carib debate again...sigh. It is very exciting to see the DO match list and know of the great opportunities ahead!
 
thanks, hockeydr 👍
 
.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Not to feed the fire or anything... But on Pre-allo there's a thread about a kid from Ross with straight A's and a 250 on the Step 1 couldn't get into gas. Now how many DOs get into gas every year without any problem?
 
Thanks for the informative thread HockeyDr.
 
really?! Why are people still coming onto DO threads to argue for Caribbean schools, NO ONE HERE GIVES TWO ****S ABOUT THE CARIBBEAN HENCE WHY MOST PEOPLE HERE ARE GOING DO OR HAVE ALREADY GONE DO, WE WANT A BETTER CHANCE AT BEING DOCTORS

I will pass on the 250,000 debt with a good chance of dropping out or not matching, thank you. You are too kind to skew stats otherwise though
 
The back and forth on here kept me up past my bed-time last night but it was worth it to see some of the info/stats that are getting put up.

HockeyDoc (as I call you), that's some epic posting. Thanks for the breakdowns.
 
:idea::idea::idea::idea::idea::idea::idea:
👍

(read the whole thread)

P.S: I love to see the residents stepping in and dropping the hammer.

You are welcome. There is only so much garbage we will allow to pass before we have to set the record straight. You are making decisions that will affect the rest of your lives and as such you need proper information. If you are a DO, you speak english and you have a pulse, you will have no problem getting an ACGME residency in IM, FP, Peds, OB/Gyn or Psych. You will need to do well on your boards (just like your MD counterparts) to get more competitive spots in Rads, Derm, RadOnc, Ortho, EM and Anesthesia but they are well within the realm of possibilities. NS and Gen surg are very difficult so you will be better off taking an AOA spot. Either way, there is not one specialty in medicine closed to you as a DO. Work hard and you will get what you want plain and simple. Should you choose to take an ACGME or AOA spot you have virtually a 100% chance of matching. US IMGs have about a 50% match rate for residency. Drfraud is stuck on the fact that we only match 35% into an ACGME residency, which is incorrect, the % of DOs who match to ACGME that actually apply to ACGME and do not withdraw for an AOA spot is closer to 75%. Bottom line...after you grind through med school for 4 years, 98% DOs will be a resident somewhere and thus will be on their way to being an attending....50% of US IMG's will be doing the same, the other 50% will be working at starbucks or 'taking a year off for research"..................
 
You are welcome. There is only so much garbage we will allow to pass before we have to set the record straight. You are making decisions that will affect the rest of your lives and as such you need proper information. If you are a DO, you speak english and you have a pulse, you will have no problem getting an ACGME residency in IM, FP, Peds, OB/Gyn or Psych. You will need to do well on your boards (just like your MD counterparts) to get more competitive spots in Rads, Derm, RadOnc, Ortho, EM and Anesthesia but they are well within the realm of possibilities. NS and Gen surg are very difficult so you will be better off taking an AOA spot. Either way, there is not one specialty in medicine closed to you as a DO. Work hard and you will get what you want plain and simple. Should you choose to take an ACGME or AOA spot you have virtually a 100% chance of matching. US IMGs have about a 50% match rate for residency. Drfraud is stuck on the fact that we only match 35% into an ACGME residency, which is incorrect, the % of DOs who match to ACGME that actually apply to ACGME and do not withdraw for an AOA spot is closer to 75%. Bottom line...after you grind through med school for 4 years, 98% DOs will be a resident somewhere and thus will be on their way to being an attending....50% of US IMG's will be doing the same, the other 50% will be working at starbucks or 'taking a year off for research"..................

👍 Love it
 
yeah but I have it on good authority that starbucks is pretty awsome to work for. So IMG should be fine guys.
 
Dr. Fraud,
Please get over your inferiority complex of being a Carib student. You made your choice now make the best of it. Let the numbers speak for themselves. You have repeatedly expressed your stance in multiple forums on multiple occassions and its becoming a bit redundant. Let it go. No matter how You try to use "statistics" to support your stance, most SDNers are well aware that anything Stateside >>>> anything Carib. That's that.

VALUEMD awaits your words of "wisdom."
 
yeah but I have it on good authority that starbucks is pretty awsome to work for. So IMG should be fine guys.

Good coffee, good banana bread...heard the benefits package is good, dental etc :laugh:
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Top Bottom