- Joined
- Oct 9, 2013
- Messages
- 698
- Reaction score
- 467
And don't half a million people live in Portland? I wouldn't call that a small city. Don't know much about the program, but I was surprised to read all that about the city.
Might it be that you're a bit of a snob, in the city department? I don't mean this in an insulting way, necessarily. Portland is a small city, not LA, NYC, or Chicago. It's not going to be an open-all-night kind of place.After having lived in a city for most of my life, the place felt almost rural without much happening anywhere. Apart from a few fancy restaurants, there were very few shops and hangout spots open late. I literally spent my first evening walking across the city searching for a good pub where I could meet people and have an interesting conversation.
You're really putting your city critic credibility in jeopardy if you're putting LA in the same breath as good public transportation. It's handy when the bus happens to be where you're going, but your really limit your life in LA when you have to depend on public transportation every day.All that said, Portland does have very good public transportation. That’s something I forgot to mention in my original review. Even if it’s not as good as NYC or LA or Denver in terms of hours and frequency, it’s still very good.
Thank you Doctor Bagel for the updates. I clearly must've been misled by the board next to the tram alighting point that suggested that it ran up to 5.30 pm on weekdays, and 1 pm on Saturday with no service on Sunday. Also, as an addendum to the review, let me post the current salary from the link you'd provided:
PGY1 - $51,000
PGY2 - $53,400
PGY3 - $55,900
PGY4 - $58,800
However, I'm not sure I can agree entirely with the sentiments of the posters above with regard to the city as what I wrote was based on my personal impression. I interviewed on a Monday, but I decided to arrive in Portland as early as Saturday as I figured I'll catch up with my friend from medical school with whom I was staying. So, I had three evenings in the city including a weekend. After having lived in a city for most of my life, the place felt almost rural without much happening anywhere. Apart from a few fancy restaurants, there were very few shops and hangout spots open late. I literally spent my first evening walking across the city searching for a good pub where I could meet people and have an interesting conversation. My mate from medical school who is a current resident at OHSU in a different specialty echoed my sentiments about the city.
All that said, Portland does have very good public transportation. That’s something I forgot to mention in my original review. Even if it’s not as good as NYC or LA or Denver in terms of hours and frequency, it’s still very good.
And, yes, there are some outdoorsy stuff to do here like hiking and skiing on the nearby mount if you like those things. And yes, it is clearly a “hipster mecca”, and yes, the residents do work too hard compared to most programs in psychiatry. None of those are major positives for me, but if you are sure they are for you, that's great!
But if you couldn't find a decent pub in the country's literal beer Mecca, you might want to consider that you just didn't get to know the city very well. Might be more a matter of the tour guide than what's being toured....
You're really putting your city critic credibility in jeopardy if you're putting LA in the same breath as good public transportation. It's handy when the bus happens to be where you're going, but your really limit your life in LA when you have to depend on public transportation every day.
You're really putting your city critic credibility in jeopardy if you're putting LA in the same breath as good public transportation. It's handy when the bus happens to be where you're going, but your really limit your life in LA when you have to depend on public transportation every day.
As long as you have four hours to get from your house to Walmart....Portland is ranked #2 for public transportation in the country, and LA is #9! But, LA still has 96% of the area accessible by public transportation while Portland has only 83.5% coverage so I guess you can find more buses going to where you want to go in LA than Portland.![]()
You're really putting your city critic credibility in jeopardy if you're putting LA in the same breath as good public transportation. It's handy whenthe bus happens to be where you're goingyour car breaks down and you have no friends and not enough money to use a car service, butyour really limit your life in LAyou'll have to choose between sleep and being able to work full time when you have to depend on public transportation every day.
MUSC Charleston, SC
1. Communication- normal, friendly
2. Accommodation & Food- no accommodation but affordable hotels walking distance w musc rates. Dinner night before at awesome intimate Italian place- you get to order whatever you want. breakfast of croissants and fruit. Lunch you get to order- highly recommend Asian salad with tuna (lightly seared filet of tuna).
3. Interview Day (Schedule, Type Of Interview, Unusual Questions, Experiences)- started at 8am with overview by PD and chief then 3- 30min interviews with someone who matches something about you (religion or psych interests). Interviews very conversational and fun they just want to sell the program and the city. No unusual questions or even "why Psyxh". After interviews lunch and then tour. Early day over at 2. Two interns gave our tour so we didn't see any hospital rooms or inside the psych wards.. Just the gym and locker rooms(nice tho).
4. Program Overview- very awesome schedule with no call. Because night float starts 5pm and covers weekends too (kinda like ER shifts you can stack night float)
5. Faculty- no idea seem real nice
6. Location & Lifestyle- charleston- beach not too far and cute downtown. Southern town but not as quirky as savannah (prob cuz no art school running the city).
7. Salary & Benefits- low salary
8. Program Strengths- schedule, PD, happy residents, elective choices, top 10 nih funding but no research required
9. Potential Weaknesses-the city
Although beach is a huge plus, working at VA, tourist takeover in winter
This.OHSU
9. Potential Weaknesses
- Program director seemed a little TOO chill
I know here I felt like I worked harder as an intern than I anticipated, and that led to some bitterness. Of course now I work less than a lot of 3rd year residents thanks to our super front-loaded call system, but that doesn't prevent burnout in the 1st and 2nd years.
Doctor Bagel,
I wanted to PM you this question before I realized the answer could benefit everyone. This is something that was not revealed to me on my interview day at OHSU, even though I did ask the question directly to a resident.
And this is about the attrition rate at your program. It's by sheer chance that I stumbled upon this thread you'd posted a year ago:
Can you comment on this issue, and if you've figured out the real reasons behind the high attrition rate (in the last post on that thread, you'd hypothesized that it could be happening because of the difficult PGY-1 & PGY-2 years)?
Thanks.
Ok. Details schmeetails. There's only one thing I need to know about Portland.... The dream of the 90's.... is it still alive?
Awesome! Let's form a band!Yes! And the dream of the 1890s. I need to get out my flannel.
Interviewing has been a real eye-opening experience. Many of the programs that I thought would be at the top of my list have moved to the very bottom. It seems the more prestigious a program is, the more malignant.
A little reframe maybe?
The more prestigious a program, the more likely it will supply residents with a wealth of clinical material to learn from. The only distinction between a malignant program and a truly excellent program is the perception of the quality of teaching associated with a lot of hard work. All of the very best programs work residents fairly hard in my opinion.
For me, I'm having trouble reconciling location with quality of the program. All of the programs I like are in a undesirable location. And I don't really like the programs that are in a desirable location.
That being said I understand nothing in life will be 100% perfect, but I don't know what to sacrifice - location, or a few things I really wanted out of a program. I think I'm leaning towards to choosing location over quality of program. Is that a terrible idea? I mean none of the places I'm interviewing at are bad programs, they are just missing a few things I would want.
^True. It is all about compromises. And we can't all match at our #1s. I'm just going to try and remind myself that I can adapt to anything. If there's one thing I've learned over the last few years its that the people around you make everything better. I'm a Carib grad and moving to the islands for 2 years was definitely tough but once I made friends it was actually fun and I didn't mind it at all. I keep reminding myself of this everyday, to prepare for the event that I don't match at any of my top choices. It might be hard starting over in a new place, but definitely doable.
Unless your goals are very academic. If you don't have those goals or at least have them to a lesser extent then programs become very similar. And location can ride shot gun on your ranking adventure.
Nasrudin describes my situation perfectly - I have minimal academic or research interests; maybe not exactly zero, but it is not a primary concern. I am simply looking for clinical variety in a reasonable work load environment with pleasant, supportive, and friendly colleagues, all based in a geographic location with reasonable cost of living and decent weather along with varied diversions in the town and region for days off.
Thus far I am finding that most of the programs on my list are suitable with minor differences between them, so I am focused a bit more on locational aspects to the point that the final ranking will probably be driven more by location than by program. Ideally, my #1 program will be in my #1 location, and so on, and right now I can honestly say that my top 3 programs are in the top 3 geographic locations with only the slightest differences between them preference-wise, so my greater challenge will be ranking the rest of the programs where there is more divergence in preference for location.
Portland sounds like a neat place, but I had reservations about the program (based in large part on your posts from the last couple of years), and I also don't like the sound of 7 months of gray, dreary, rainy days (or however long the season lasts). So I did not apply (same thing for Seattle).
Until someone comes along and posts a new, positive review to counter the really negative review someone put up recently, OHSU is going to have a hard time winning new fans on SDN. It will take a couple of such reviews. I think UC Denver has suffered from one really negative report and nothing very persuasively written to offer readers a different opinion (I didn't apply there, either).
When it came to "researching" programs for applications, I was heavily influenced by SDN reviews, and admittedly probably a little too influenced by the negative and lukewarm reviews, and also overly influenced by the superlative reviews. But when you have nothing else to go on, SDN reviews carry a lot of weight, fair or not to the programs, and whether or not valid for applicants decision making.
This may sound dumb, but it might be best to purge SDN of interview reviews that are more than 2 oir 3 seasons old. There is a limited time value to these reviews.
Thats a good thought, unfortuantely however it seems people are posting far fewer reviews this year, so we might end up not having any opinions on the vast majority of programs if we did that.
Thats a good thought, unfortuantely however it seems people are posting far fewer reviews this year, so we might end up not having any opinions on the vast majority of programs if we did that.
Maybe this review thing should let go of any pretense of validity. Since there is no way out of the selection bias thing, maybe this should just become the yelp of psychiatry. SDN can charge programs to have good reviews float to the top and have the bad reviews be emphasized for those deadbeat programs that will not pay ransom. A little reaching out to miserable residents could easily supply the bad reviews, and programs can write their own good reviews. Isn’t capitalism grand?