- Joined
- Oct 22, 2013
- Messages
- 8,597
- Reaction score
- 19,854
This came out in April of this year. Have we talked about it on this board?
https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/AAMC-National-MDPhD-Program-Outcomes-Study-2018.pdf
Unlike past reports (to my knowledge), this one separates the data out by graduation year cohorts (thus allowing us to distinguish from people who graduated before 1975, during/immediately after the NIH doubling, and 2000-2014).
Some interesting figures in the report. Although the number of MD/PhD grads in PP has gone up, most are still employed in Academia full-time. >60% of those in academia have grant support and >50% of alumni have 50% or greater research effort with about a third >70% effort, and 18% with 80/20 or greater research/clinical. Theres also a section focused on grant support attained by people transitioning to independence (assistant profs from 2004-5 to 2013-14)
https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/AAMC-National-MDPhD-Program-Outcomes-Study-2018.pdf
Unlike past reports (to my knowledge), this one separates the data out by graduation year cohorts (thus allowing us to distinguish from people who graduated before 1975, during/immediately after the NIH doubling, and 2000-2014).
Some interesting figures in the report. Although the number of MD/PhD grads in PP has gone up, most are still employed in Academia full-time. >60% of those in academia have grant support and >50% of alumni have 50% or greater research effort with about a third >70% effort, and 18% with 80/20 or greater research/clinical. Theres also a section focused on grant support attained by people transitioning to independence (assistant profs from 2004-5 to 2013-14)