- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Messages
- 2,334
- Reaction score
- 4,316
Some institutions (particularly higher ranked ones) make decisions without communicating to trainees and place applicants into the Rejected category based upon desired academic benchmarks. The seeking group is a set of applicants whose best outcome has been: 1) no action, 2) interviewed, 3) alternate, 4) hold (for any reason) and 5) request secondary. It is unfortunate that only a small group of schools utilize all of the codes effectively, for example, only about 250 applicants have been "interview" as per the system despite that at least 900 applicants interviewed in MD/PhD programs. Most often, early on, applicants transition from the "No Action" category to the "1st MD/PhD acceptance" without being placed in intermediate steps (i.e.: request secondary, interviewed). Part of the reason is that the AMCAS primary users in schools tend to be within the SOM UME office, while interviews and offers are coordinated at the MD/PhD program level without intermediate changes in the AMCAS profiles of applicants. Furthermore, the present cycle was very unusual. There were a very high number of applicants in the rejected category in January and February (see my prior posts) and then schools have to broaden and go deeper into their waitlist/interviewed applicants.
Last edited: