- Joined
- May 17, 2013
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 75
Hi guys! I figured that after leeching off of the tons of breakdowns on here, I might as well make my own to help some people. I can be a huge slacker, especially when it comes to big tests like this. I originally set my test date for 7/14, then pushed it back a week because I knew almost nothing, then I finally pushed it back to 8/2 and got my act together for about 2 weeks. Even then, I was probably only averaging 4 hours a day because of how easily I got distracted, but it was far better than before.
My scores:
19 PAT
19 QR
24 RC
20 Bio
20 Gen Chem
19 Orgo
20 TS
20 AA
PAT:
Hole Punching: A complete joke. I probably had several ones where there were just multiple half-folds. Way easier than CDP.
Keyholes: Ugh. This was easily my best section on CDP, but those keyholes were wayyyyy harder. Way more size comparisons.
Angles: Easier than CDP, but not by a lot. I kept reading about how they were a joke compared to CDP, but mine definitely weren't.
Pattern Folding: Bahahaha, I guessed on all of them. This section is probably why I got a 19. I have no idea to do these, and I never will.
TFE: Definitely easier than CDP. No insanely weird structures.
Cube Counting: Very easy. I had four structures, but none were above 15 cubes.
How I studied: I probably did 5 cdp tests all the way through the week before my test. PAT isn't too bad as long as you have a few of the sections you can fall back on.
QR:
I did not study at all for this aside from doing the first Qvault test. The problems on the real thing were incredibly similar to the practice test. I mean, a good portion of the same kinds of word problems showed up. I am pretty good at arithmetic and algebra, so I just used that to counter my lack of any knowledge on probability, trig, and geometry (which all showed up). The section isn't too difficult (especially if you know the stuff I didn't bother with), but it definitely takes some quick thinking.
RC:
Seriously. I did not even do one practice test, and I started freaking out during my break because I realized I hadn't even decided on a strategy. I just decided to go with the ol' SnD (look at the question, search the passage for the key word and select answer, rinse and repeat), and apparently it paid off. My passages were pretty basic. I think they were all 14 paragraphs. I only got one tone questions, but a bunch of "finish this paragraph" and "best synonym for x" questions.
Bio
For this section, I just read through Barrons AP bio once, made notecards on pretty much everything, and reviewed those. I read through alan's notes 3 days before my test, making more cards on anything I missed from Barrons. The actual test was fair, but I wasn't a fan of it. A ton of cell bio and ecology / evolution questions, but only a few developmental bio questions, and only ONE A&P question. At least I only got one plant question. Oh, and if you are studying the night before and come across something that you think "I won't need to know that," such as a certain ecology equation (hint), it will show up. Twice.
Gen Chem
I am very sad about this score. I went through Chad's videos twice, and did all of the qvault tests, and knew pretty much everything. Even on the real thing, I only marked one gen chem question, whereas half of bio and orgo were marked. Maybe everybody just did really well on it, but I don't know. Probably about 50-50 math and concepts. Just know chad's and you will be fine.
Orgo
I am terrible at orgo, and I always will be. I used the same stuff as what I used for gen chem, but after finishing the sciences, I was certain that I got like a 15. I learned everything chad went over, but when I got different looking reagents, I just froze up. Luckily, about 40% was concepts, and I think I got most of them. No IR, and two NMR, which weren't too difficult.
Overall, I would say that the exam is not as bad as people make it seem. With a few weeks of dedication and hard work, you should be able to pull off 20+ scores, unless you're just really unlucky with what you are tested on.
If you have any questions, ask away! At least I won't be putting off anything while browsing these forums now
My scores:
19 PAT
19 QR
24 RC
20 Bio
20 Gen Chem
19 Orgo
20 TS
20 AA
PAT:
Hole Punching: A complete joke. I probably had several ones where there were just multiple half-folds. Way easier than CDP.
Keyholes: Ugh. This was easily my best section on CDP, but those keyholes were wayyyyy harder. Way more size comparisons.
Angles: Easier than CDP, but not by a lot. I kept reading about how they were a joke compared to CDP, but mine definitely weren't.
Pattern Folding: Bahahaha, I guessed on all of them. This section is probably why I got a 19. I have no idea to do these, and I never will.
TFE: Definitely easier than CDP. No insanely weird structures.
Cube Counting: Very easy. I had four structures, but none were above 15 cubes.
How I studied: I probably did 5 cdp tests all the way through the week before my test. PAT isn't too bad as long as you have a few of the sections you can fall back on.
QR:
I did not study at all for this aside from doing the first Qvault test. The problems on the real thing were incredibly similar to the practice test. I mean, a good portion of the same kinds of word problems showed up. I am pretty good at arithmetic and algebra, so I just used that to counter my lack of any knowledge on probability, trig, and geometry (which all showed up). The section isn't too difficult (especially if you know the stuff I didn't bother with), but it definitely takes some quick thinking.
RC:
Seriously. I did not even do one practice test, and I started freaking out during my break because I realized I hadn't even decided on a strategy. I just decided to go with the ol' SnD (look at the question, search the passage for the key word and select answer, rinse and repeat), and apparently it paid off. My passages were pretty basic. I think they were all 14 paragraphs. I only got one tone questions, but a bunch of "finish this paragraph" and "best synonym for x" questions.
Bio
For this section, I just read through Barrons AP bio once, made notecards on pretty much everything, and reviewed those. I read through alan's notes 3 days before my test, making more cards on anything I missed from Barrons. The actual test was fair, but I wasn't a fan of it. A ton of cell bio and ecology / evolution questions, but only a few developmental bio questions, and only ONE A&P question. At least I only got one plant question. Oh, and if you are studying the night before and come across something that you think "I won't need to know that," such as a certain ecology equation (hint), it will show up. Twice.
Gen Chem
I am very sad about this score. I went through Chad's videos twice, and did all of the qvault tests, and knew pretty much everything. Even on the real thing, I only marked one gen chem question, whereas half of bio and orgo were marked. Maybe everybody just did really well on it, but I don't know. Probably about 50-50 math and concepts. Just know chad's and you will be fine.
Orgo
I am terrible at orgo, and I always will be. I used the same stuff as what I used for gen chem, but after finishing the sciences, I was certain that I got like a 15. I learned everything chad went over, but when I got different looking reagents, I just froze up. Luckily, about 40% was concepts, and I think I got most of them. No IR, and two NMR, which weren't too difficult.
Overall, I would say that the exam is not as bad as people make it seem. With a few weeks of dedication and hard work, you should be able to pull off 20+ scores, unless you're just really unlucky with what you are tested on.
If you have any questions, ask away! At least I won't be putting off anything while browsing these forums now
Last edited: