- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
- Messages
- 300
- Reaction score
- 1
I know some schools have systems that allow for A+'s
My questions is when adcoms evaluate two transcripts, and one comes from a student who went to a school that uses A+'s, and another comes from a school which doesn't, suppose the two transcripts look like this:
Student A (from school that has A+'s)
XYZ101: A+
XYZ201: A
AZZ301: A
XYA401: A+
Student B (from school with no A+'s)
XYZ101: A
XYZ201: A -
AZZ301: A -
XYA401: A
Will adcoms look at these two students as essentially the same? I can reason two ways:
(a) yes, adcoms will treat the students as being academically analogous, as both received maximum possible grades in two courses and one step below the max in two other courses; an A+ for student A = an A for student B, and an A- for student B = an A for student A
...or...
(b) no, adcoms will treat student A as superior, despite the fact that his "earning potential" was higher, simply because an A+ is an A+ and an A is an A.
is the A in student A's school viewed as an A- by adcoms because it wasn't 'perfect'?
Which of these two options is true?
If (b) is true, than I think the evaluation system is completely unfair because (a) seems more logical to me.
What do you think?
My questions is when adcoms evaluate two transcripts, and one comes from a student who went to a school that uses A+'s, and another comes from a school which doesn't, suppose the two transcripts look like this:
Student A (from school that has A+'s)
XYZ101: A+
XYZ201: A
AZZ301: A
XYA401: A+
Student B (from school with no A+'s)
XYZ101: A
XYZ201: A -
AZZ301: A -
XYA401: A
Will adcoms look at these two students as essentially the same? I can reason two ways:
(a) yes, adcoms will treat the students as being academically analogous, as both received maximum possible grades in two courses and one step below the max in two other courses; an A+ for student A = an A for student B, and an A- for student B = an A for student A
...or...
(b) no, adcoms will treat student A as superior, despite the fact that his "earning potential" was higher, simply because an A+ is an A+ and an A is an A.
is the A in student A's school viewed as an A- by adcoms because it wasn't 'perfect'?
Which of these two options is true?
If (b) is true, than I think the evaluation system is completely unfair because (a) seems more logical to me.
What do you think?