- Joined
- Jan 9, 2002
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
ok well here goes my story. My dad has NA ancestry from both of his grandparents, and they lived in oklahoma on a reservation and everything - but for some reason, they are not on any rolls that we have come acrossed, and so I cannot as of yet prove NA ancestry. This definitely affected me last year when i applied for undergrad @ UC's, Stanford, USC, ......etc Well, come february of that year, i received a letter from stanford with a form to fill out - it asked for percentage of NA blood, CDIB #(something i dont have still), etc. I wrote on there that i was searching - as fake as that sounds. So march comes around, the time to get decisions - One by one each of the colleges that i had applied to came in with acceptances - all of them - UC Berk, UCLA, UCSD, UCI, UCSB, ....USC.....and then, after going 10/10 acceptances, i got a letter from stanford stating my rejection. I was devastated - my stats were really good for a URM(though i couldnt prove that status) - 1420 SAT, 750 Sat2 writing, 710 math 2c, 700 Ah, 4.4, good EC'S .........basically - i felt and still do feel that if i could have proven NA ancestry on that form then i def. would have got in. My stats were high for a URM period. I was and still am pissed about this - this does apply to this board btw, - med school admissions -do they look at ethnicity. Are public med schools like the Uc's allowed to send a stanford prove your an indian form. If in interview, i am not brown, will my ancestry be disregarded - even if i can prove it - which is unlikely. And yes i am only about 1/6 NA, but its realy racist for people to discount it cuz some people of that percentage black look it , and get all the AA benefits. Sorry this is long 😉