- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
- Messages
- 293
- Reaction score
- 570
I've always had trouble finding middle ground. Does "the buck stop here", with AAMC, or are there some cases in which these forums are arguably better equipped?
It was an AAMC representative when I called in yesterday.Can you link where AAMC says this?
The "buck stops" with you!!!! You need to learn how to figure things out for yourself in order to be successful in anything, including but not limited to med school admissions.I've always had trouble finding middle ground. Does "the buck stop here", with AAMC, or are there some cases in which these forums are arguably better equipped?
That makes sense, thanks man.The "buck stops" with you!!!! You need to learn how to figure things out for yourself in order to be successful in anything, including but not limited to med school admissions.
SDN is a resource, like anything else. YOU need to learn how to separate good information from bad, because you will find both, everywhere, including with AMCAS phone reps. That said, yes, to the extent an AMCAS phone rep took exception to anything you were told on SDN, the best place to get an answer to an AMCAS question is from AMCAS, not from an anonymous online forum.
I learned an incredible amount about the process from this site, but there is also plenty of bad information here. You will only learn how to separate good from bad with experience, but that is not limited to SDN. Most of us have received at least some bad advice from the advising offices at our schools, and the same can be said about pretty much any place that provides information.
The advice you receive from places like SDN is free to you (you don't need to donate to either lurk or post), and is provided by people who are not paid to post. It is worth far more than what you pay. YOU need to decide which questions are better asked and answered elsewhere.
Well, you have on SDN Adcom members and even some Admissions Deans representing about 10% of US med schools.I've always had trouble finding middle ground. Does "the buck stop here", with AAMC, or are there some cases in which these forums are arguably better equipped?
I agree with this somewhat. 3 of the 4 schools I have interviews at, I was recommended to not apply so people really do need to know their applications, school missions, and make some of their own decisions.IDK sometimes you come on this forumn and the first 10 threads with activity are just people whining about prestige and rankings or other irrelevant things like if they are competitive with a 529/4.5 or if going to a public undergrad will end your chances at a good medical school.
Also some of the WAMC and school list threads are overly negative towards not applying 'high' and I think people forget that a lot of luck is involved and a good essay or vibe can sway your app positively. Of course it's important to have an appropriate school list on the low-mid end, but people always say 'donation to top schools' way too often and if I and many of my friends had listened to such advice here we would have zero A's right now and half the II's (this does not mean I'm endorsing applying to WashU with a 503 MCAT, be realistic).
It’s actually wild how old SDN was. Once out of curiosity I was wondering how 9/11 affected med school apps, and after some searching found a lot of interesting discussion on the subject.The AAMC, AACOM, medical schools, NAAHP, and premed advisors have a historical dislike to SDN forum from its past reputation as the "wild west." Indeed a decade (actually closer to two about 2003) when I was first with both OPM (Old Pre Meds) and SDN, the latter was by filled with obnoxious, rude, vitriolic along with a large fraction of wholly ridiculous misinformation. This was at a time when the number of medical school applicants was quickly growing and the amplification of misinformation at that time was due in a great part to the influence of SDN. Just for comparison, while OPM was 1/10th or 1/20th the size of SDN, we had no moderators and only once in about 10 years did I ever had to ban anyone.
I actually left SDN and deleted my account in 2007 I believe. It was @Lee a few years later at an OPM conference asked me to come back because he wanted to get accurate information on the site. This also made me essentially an informal liaison to the AAMC, medical schools, etc which I often passed on questions and information . With the maturity of the first generation of SDNers coming back to the site and a robust moderation system, the wild west it once was is no more. However, some of the past reputation incorrectly remains across the spectrum of premedical and medical schools.
People on SDN gave me advice on my primary and secondary essays and I went from 0 IIs last cycle to getting numerous DO's and 3 MD IIs this cycle and am going to a DO school that's close to home. The help from here is what pushed me over to getting IIs as the only difference on my app was less than 20 more hours of volunteering between cycles.I've always had trouble finding middle ground. Does "the buck stop here", with AAMC, or are there some cases in which these forums are arguably better equipped?
There's a lot of garbage on preallo (and reddit is much worse than SDN on that regard because that site is a toxic echo chamber that hides downvoted posts). But what makes SDN powerful is the absolute golden advice and recommendations from adcoms and faculty. I try to save their wisdom in directories that are stickied in the forums, but even then, not all advice is indexed. My best suggestion is to strictly follow the recommendations from adcoms, faculty, attendings and even med students on here (especially in school-specific threads) and ignore all other crap.I've always had trouble finding middle ground. Does "the buck stop here", with AAMC, or are there some cases in which these forums are arguably better equipped?