ACA and pediatrics

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Awesome Sauceome

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
2,826
Points
5,161
Location
In a pine tree
  1. Non-Student
Is there any word on what the ACA will do for/against the field of pediatrics?

I have heard with FM the reimbursements are lowering and politicians are assuming that that is ok because FM docs would be able to see more patients (because more have insurance). Is this similar for peds or would they not be affected much?
 
My impression is that the insurance part won't affect peds so much, because kids are usually already covered under medicaid or a similar program.
 
Only thing I worry about is that there will be more total patients on Medicaid fighting for the same amount of money. Proportionally there will be fewer kids on Medicaid. This may effect our reimbursement.

Ed
 
Only thing I worry about is that there will be more total patients on Medicaid fighting for the same amount of money. Proportionally there will be fewer kids on Medicaid. This may effect our reimbursement.

Ed

Doesn't the ACA expand Medicaid substantially?
 
https://www.advisory.com/Research/P...t-Insights/Medicaid-payment-increase-for-PCPs
http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/assets/v1-enhanced-medicaid-reimbursement-rates.pdf

The reimbursement rates for Medicaid patients are being increased by an average of 73%, not decreased. This will bring Medicaid patients up to the reimbursement rate of Medicare patients. The ACA has not reduced PCP payments in any way so far as I can tell. PCP providers are considered to be providers of general IM, pediatric, and FM care, so they should all see an increase in payment if they treat Medicaid patients. If you are seeing privately insured patients, it won't affect you at all.
 
The effect on peds is small.

The biggest change so far is that most of the Obamacare plans use much higher deductibles than employer based insurance uses. A lot of people are switching away from employer based plans to Obamacare plans, and instead of paying a $30 copay for a doctor visit, you have to pay the entire doctor visit cost out of your deductible. This incentivizes the parents to not bring their child to the doctor's office unless it is something more serious than runny nose and cough (maybe that's a good thing!)

The Medicaid increased reimbursements is a red herring. In 3 years those increased reimbursements will be phased out. It is a political ploy to help smoothe out the rough transition to Obamacare. Rest assured that in 3 to 5 years, those increased reimbursements are going away.

That's not the real problem however. The real problem is that if you are building a practice relying on these Medicaid patients, in 3 years when the reimbursements plummet again you will have to essentially build up your practice from scratch if you want to get back into the private insurance market. Building up a practice, regardless of whether you are general peds or a subspecialist, is no easy task. If you take Medicaid, it becomes very difficult to have any significant private insurance patients for 2 reasons:

1. Most state medicaid contracts require you to have an "all or nothing" approach. In other words, if you accept Medicaid, you have to give all medicaid patients "equal access" to your scheduling system.

2. If you give Medicaid patients "equal access" to your scheduling system, then it is virtually inevitable that your share of private insurance patients will dwindle down while your patient base becomes overwhelmingly Medicaid. This is due to the fact that Medicaid patients are desperate to find PCPs and there's a lot more of them relative to private insurance patients who are looking for new PCPs.

A colleague of mine shared his experience with this. His state temporarily increased Medicaid payments to 75 percent of Medicare a few years ago, so he started taking Medicaid patients as a way to "give back" to the community as he felt bad for poor kids who couldnt get into a doc. In 1 year, he went from 100 percent private insurance visits to less than 10 percent private insurance. He was absolutely inundated with Medicaid folks. When the state pulled back funding on Medicaid to previous low levels, he tried to go back to mostly private insurance but it took him a long time to rebuild that patient base because a good chunk of his private insurance patients left for other PCPs due to them not being able to get to the doc for visits in a timely fashion. When your phone lines are flooded with 5000 medicaid patients trying to get an appointment, there's no room left for the 500 private insurance patients to get in to see you. Eventually they start going somewhere else even if they like you.

Beware of the "bait and switch" strategy that state and federal governments use to screw over doctors.
 
The Medicaid increased reimbursements is a red herring. In 3 years those increased reimbursements will be phased out. It is a political ploy to help smoothe out the rough transition to Obamacare. Rest assured that in 3 to 5 years, those increased reimbursements are going away.
.

Is this in the law somewhere or just your belief? I hadn't heard about it.
 
Is this in the law somewhere or just your belief? I hadn't heard about it.

https://www.advisory.com/Research/P...t-Insights/Medicaid-payment-increase-for-PCPs

It is in the law. The final CMS rule authorizes the increased payments for only 2 years before it automatically expires. Congress or the president will have to reauthorize it in order for it to continue. Possible? Sure. Likely? I think not. This was a political ploy to get docs on the Medicaid bandwagon just long enough to quiet some of the turmoil in the rollout of the ACA. After the controversy calms down and the American public gets used to Obamacare, I put very low odds on the executive branch or Congress continuing with these increased payments. They might do a gradual phaseout instead of an abrupt cut, but either way I dont like it.
 
The effect on peds is small.

The biggest change so far is that most of the Obamacare plans use much higher deductibles than employer based insurance uses. A lot of people are switching away from employer based plans to Obamacare plans, and instead of paying a $30 copay for a doctor visit, you have to pay the entire doctor visit cost out of your deductible. This incentivizes the parents to not bring their child to the doctor's office unless it is something more serious than runny nose and cough (maybe that's a good thing!)

The Medicaid increased reimbursements is a red herring. In 3 years those increased reimbursements will be phased out. It is a political ploy to help smoothe out the rough transition to Obamacare. Rest assured that in 3 to 5 years, those increased reimbursements are going away.

That's not the real problem however. The real problem is that if you are building a practice relying on these Medicaid patients, in 3 years when the reimbursements plummet again you will have to essentially build up your practice from scratch if you want to get back into the private insurance market. Building up a practice, regardless of whether you are general peds or a subspecialist, is no easy task. If you take Medicaid, it becomes very difficult to have any significant private insurance patients for 2 reasons:

1. Most state medicaid contracts require you to have an "all or nothing" approach. In other words, if you accept Medicaid, you have to give all medicaid patients "equal access" to your scheduling system.

2. If you give Medicaid patients "equal access" to your scheduling system, then it is virtually inevitable that your share of private insurance patients will dwindle down while your patient base becomes overwhelmingly Medicaid. This is due to the fact that Medicaid patients are desperate to find PCPs and there's a lot more of them relative to private insurance patients who are looking for new PCPs.

A colleague of mine shared his experience with this. His state temporarily increased Medicaid payments to 75 percent of Medicare a few years ago, so he started taking Medicaid patients as a way to "give back" to the community as he felt bad for poor kids who couldnt get into a doc. In 1 year, he went from 100 percent private insurance visits to less than 10 percent private insurance. He was absolutely inundated with Medicaid folks. When the state pulled back funding on Medicaid to previous low levels, he tried to go back to mostly private insurance but it took him a long time to rebuild that patient base because a good chunk of his private insurance patients left for other PCPs due to them not being able to get to the doc for visits in a timely fashion. When your phone lines are flooded with 5000 medicaid patients trying to get an appointment, there's no room left for the 500 private insurance patients to get in to see you. Eventually they start going somewhere else even if they like you.

Beware of the "bait and switch" strategy that state and federal governments use to screw over doctors.

Wow, talk about no good deed goes left unpunished.
 
Top Bottom