Accept CNUCOM or Reapply

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

AquamanForever

New Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 14, 2016
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
A few days ago, I got an acceptance letter from CNUCOM (Califronia Northstate School of Medicine) after getting off the waitlist and have since been considering whether to accept or apply again next year. Yesterday, I was offered a job that would allow me to work with patients by coordinating clinical trials and write papers. Two things which I believe were sorely lacking on my prior application and which could greatly increase my application success. I had a 3.46 GPA from UCB and 38 MCAT (I will have to take it again, but I am confident I can maintain or improve my score). Therefore, I believe I should be able to get into a medical school with a better reputation. I hope to work in academic medicine and was wondering whether that was possible and which choice would maximize my opportunities post-medical school. Any advice you could offer would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
A lot of people on SDN are going to tell you to wait another year but if it were me I'd take the acceptance. It's tough to get into a CA MD school with a 3.48 regardless of MCAT.
 
You deserve better.

Do you think it would be worth it for the OP if they reapply to try and mention in the "anything else you want to tell us" part of the app for MD schools that CNU was the one they turned down and somehow listing it in a gentle mature and "politically correct" way for lack of better phrasing that highlights the fact without denigrating the school? Because otherwise they are going to be listed as an accepted applicant reapplying for MD schools. Is it out of the realm of possibility MD schools look at someone turning down CNU a little differently and with more leniency than turning down another MD school?
 
Do you think it would be worth it for the OP if they reapply to try and mention in the "anything else you want to tell us" part of the app for MD schools that CNU was the one they turned down and somehow listing it in a gentle mature and "politically correct" way for lack of better phrasing that highlights the fact without denigrating the school? Because otherwise they are going to be listed as an accepted applicant reapplying for MD schools. Is it out of the realm of possibility MD schools look at someone turning down CNU a little differently and with more leniency than turning down another MD school?
I do think that applicants, particularly CA applicants, were duped by preliminary LCME accreditation. I hold the LCME responsible for their failure to do due diligence and their continued lack of will to respond to behaviors that would have gotten any of the rest of us on probation. If OP applies to a broader list of schools (where he is not a re-applicant), this is less likely to be a problem. When asked, he could easily respond that he had no idea that a school would be likely to turn down the opportunity for its students to qualify for federally insured loans. A reasonable person would understand. This is unprecedented. Even Caribbean schools don't do this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do think that applicants, particularly CA applicants, were duped by preliminary LCME accreditation. I hold the LCME responsible for their failure to do due diligence and their continued lack of will to respond to behaviors that would have gotten any of the rest of us on probation. If OP applies to a broader list of schools (where he is not a re-applicant), this is less likely to be a problem. When asked, he could easily respond that he had no idea that a school would be likely to turn down the opportunity for federally insured loans. A reasonable person would understand. This is unprecedented.

I think the key question here would be is how many people outside of CA are as passionate as you are in expressing/feeling discotent for CNU's antics and are as aware of them? We know where you stand on CNU, but the question would be if you took a sample of 100 ADCOMs outside of California where would they stand on the CNU issue? Would it simply be "Well CNU is kind of shady but MD is MD" and "Turning it down still shows greed, lack of foresight" etc or whatever characteristic you want to insert assumed of applicants rejecting acceptances.

No way of really answering but Im posing it more as a thought question because that's what will probably be what this comes down to. If you feel like you are in the relative minority right now in the degree to which you detest what CNU has done for whatever reason, I think that's another factor here.

I remember seeing the OP posted this on another thread. Gonnif and others gave the general "never turn down an MD acceptance" response which to me kind of highlights how the shadiness of CNU's antics isnt as well understood recognized and known by others outside of California. Awareness of what CNU is doing might be the biggest obstacle if OP reapplies.

Im assuming you mean by "when asked" the part of the application that says "anything else you want to know about us"? Because otherwise you need to get IIs first to even have a chance to explain yourself at an interview which if schools simply see "accepted applicant" reapplying that will be another major obstacle.
 
Last edited:
I think the key question here would be is how many people outside of CA are as passionate as you in your disdain for CNU's antics and are as aware of them? We know where you stand on CNU, but the question would be if you took a sample of 100 ADCOMs outside of California where would their views on the CNU issue fall? Would it simply be "Well CNU is kind of shady but MD is MD" and "Turning it down still shows greed, lack of foresight" etc or whatever characteristic you want to insert assumed of applicants rejecting acceptances.

No way of really answering but Im posing it more as a thought question because that's what will probably be what this comes down to. If you feel like you are in the relative minority right now in the degree to which you despise what CNU has done for whatever reason, I think that's worth mentioning.

I remember the response the OP got posting this on another thread from gonnif and others was the general "never turn down an MD acceptance" speech which to me kind of highlights how the shadiness of CNU's antics isnt as well understood recognized and known by others outside of California. Awareness of what CNU is doing might be the biggest obstacle if OP reapplies.

Im assuming you mean by "when asked" the part of the application that says "anything else you want to know about us"? Because otherwise you need to get IIs first to even have a chance to explain yourself at an interview which if schools simply see "accepted applicant" reapplying that will be another major obstacle.
If schools outside of CA are unaware, they soon will be. Anyone who has been informed of their business decision to force their students to take private loans will have nothing but sympathy for the victims. I can't say this largesse will extend to Program Director's, though...
 
If schools outside of CA are unaware, they soon will be. Anyone who has been informed of their business decision to force their students to take private loans will have nothing but sympathy for the victims.

Yeah I get that but it also may take a couple classes to graduate for their antics to really pick up steam to gain enough national recognition. CNU has many vulnerable people to prey upon and theyve been successful at it. As an example, Cincinnati's SMP program, which is as well run as any youll find and is very closely overseen by many directly involved in MD admission, had 4 of their 31 graduates last year go to CNU. From what I know personally, at least two of these people were competitive MD applicants who did sufficiently in the SMP. While this is all pure speculation, I have a somewhat hard time believing if those at Cincinnati were really aware of CNU's antics all 4 of these people would have gone to Northstate, particularly since more than one of these likely would have gotten into another US MD school if they waited a year. Having 4 grads do that in one year stands out in a way that isnt positive for a very small program known for getting 85% of their grads into US MD schools at all.

Im guessing turning down CNU isnt really going to impact the outlook for DO admission?
 
Yeah I get that but it also may take a couple classes to graduate for their antics to really pick up steam to gain enough national recognition. CNU has many vulnerable people to prey upon and theyve been successful at it. As an example, Cincinnati's SMP program, which is as well run as any youll find and is very closely overseen by many directly involved in MD admission, had 4 of their 31 graduates last year go to CNU. From what I know personally, at least two of these people were competitive MD applicants who did sufficiently in the SMP. While this is all pure speculation, I have a somewhat hard time believing if those at Cincinnati were really aware of CNU's antics all 4 of these people would have gone to Northstate, particularly since more than one of these likely would have gotten into another US MD school if they waited a year. Having 4 grads do that stands out in a way that isnt positive for a very small program known for getting 80% of their grads into US MD schools at all.

Im guessing this isnt really going to affect the DO side of admission?
Maybe I should call them. It's embarassing.
CN"U" will have little effect on DO or MD schools. It's greatest effect is on the vulnerable, just like the Caribbean.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe I should call them. It's embarassing.

If you actually do decide to do this Ill be interested to hear their response. Like I said above it's purely speculation on my part whether they really weren't aware of this, not interested in making accusations. Some people are just stubborn about not wanting to take a gap year and people tend to be even more stubborn about staying in CA at all costs. Well within the realm of possibility Cincinnati warned them and they just didnt listen.

Here is the link btw showing their grads going to CNU. It really gets highlighted when you see how their other grads by and large do just fine and most get into US MD schools. I mispoke btw, it's 3 not 4.
https://med.uc.edu/msinphysiology/alumni/meet-the-class-of-2015
 
If you actually do decide to do this Ill be interested to hear their response. Like I said above it's purely speculation on my part whether they really weren't aware of this, not interested in making accusations. Some people are just stubborn about not wanting to take a gap year and people tend to be even more stubborn about staying in CA at all costs. Well within the realm of possibility Cincinnati warned them and they just didnt listen.

Here is the link btw showing their grads going to CNU. It really gets highlighted when you see how their other grads by and large do just fine and most get into US MD schools. I mispoke btw, it's 3 not 4.
https://med.uc.edu/msinphysiology/alumni/meet-the-class-of-2015
Thanks for the link. I'll let you know.
 
Im assuming you mean by "when asked" the part of the application that says "anything else you want to know about us"? Because otherwise you need to get IIs first to even have a chance to explain yourself at an interview which if schools simply see "accepted applicant" reapplying that will be another major obstacle.

OP - my advice would be to add "anything else you want us to know..." that you/your family didn't realize that Federal Loans weren't available at northstate and determined that matriculating there was not a viable plan, given the lack of options for financing. It's not like you're turning down Loyola trying to get into Washington University in St. Louis.
 
I do think that applicants, particularly CA applicants, were duped by preliminary LCME accreditation. I hold the LCME responsible for their failure to do due diligence and their continued lack of will to respond to behaviors that would have gotten any of the rest of us on probation. If OP applies to a broader list of schools (where he is not a re-applicant), this is less likely to be a problem. When asked, he could easily respond that he had no idea that a school would be likely to turn down the opportunity for its students to qualify for federally insured loans. A reasonable person would understand. This is unprecedented. Even Caribbean schools don't do this.

Any idea why they would force people into private loans? Any other abnormal things going on?
 
Any idea why they would force people into private loans? Any other abnormal things going on?
I have reason to believe that they are benefiting from the issuance of the loans.
Many other things. When I have proof, I will post.
 
I do think that applicants, particularly CA applicants, were duped by preliminary LCME accreditation. I hold the LCME responsible for their failure to do due diligence and their continued lack of will to respond to behaviors that would have gotten any of the rest of us on probation. If OP applies to a broader list of schools (where he is not a re-applicant), this is less likely to be a problem. When asked, he could easily respond that he had no idea that a school would be likely to turn down the opportunity for its students to qualify for federally insured loans. A reasonable person would understand. This is unprecedented. Even Caribbean schools don't do this.
Isn't the loan issue simply a byproduct of the school not having full accreditation and it's for profit status? Also, the larger point is that I would still get an MD from CNUCOM correct? Would it not have the same value as any other school I get into only two more years to pay back the loan?
 
I have reason to believe that they are benefiting from the issuance of the loans.
Many other things. When I have proof, I will post.

giphy.gif
 
There's no valid reason for premeds to be expected to reason through this. This is not criticism of premeds. This is reality. By what basis is a premed expected to comprehend how med school education funding commonly works, without prior experience or perspective? By what basis is a premed prepared to evaluate the Flexner report as applied to current socioeconomicopolitics? By what basis is a premed expected to follow the news and study the issue enough to see the overlap between CN and <fraud-committing for-profit college that premeds wouldn't be expected to name without looking it up>? By what basis is a premed qualified to map out the capitalization and amortization of private vs. federal student loans including consideration of the compensation structure of residency? By what basis is a premed prepared to compare/contrast the basic repayment structures of federal vs. private student loans?

If you can keep up with both sides of the argument, you are not a normal premed. Nor are you a normal LCME official, apparently. Nor are you a normal med school science faculty member. Apparently we are short on grownups.

It's reasonable for a premed to be focused on getting into med school in a reasonable location. It's not reasonable for a premed to be responsible for evaluating whether the med school is a dependable enterprise.

If it's true that the school had the option to take federal aid for the pharm school, and turned it down, thereby preventing all students in all programs from getting federal aid as early as possible, that's strike 1.

If it's true that school officers stated that private loans are preferable to federal aid, for any reason, that's strike 2.

If it's true that the school has any (ANY) discount or commission or whatever beneficial relationship with private lenders, including travel reimbursement to conferences, including catered lunches, that's strike 3.

If it's true that the school received community, state or federal funding for producing primary care doctors for underserved areas, that's strike 4.

For those premeds appropriately focused on getting into med school in a reasonable location: here be dragons.

Best of luck to you.
 
Isn't the loan issue simply a byproduct of the school not having full accreditation and it's for profit status? Also, the larger point is that I would still get an MD from CNUCOM correct? Would it not have the same value as any other school I get into only two more years to pay back the loan?
No. By virtue of having a pre-existing Pharmacy school, the incoming medical class (as well as the Pharm students) would have been eligible for federally insured loans. CN"U" chose not to secure the designation that would permit this.

Compare this to UNLV's new school that is gifting first year tuition to offset the burden imposed by the inability to secure federally insured loans that is inherent in a start-up school.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Speaking as a faculty member from way across the country in Florida, this is the first I've heard about this situation. Ordinarily I'm hard core in the camp of advising applicants not to ever turn down any acceptance to an accredited American medical school. But wow, I can't say I'd hold it against anyone who didn't want to matriculate at a medical school under these circumstances. Especially if the school isn't even accredited yet.

OP, given your goals and situation, I think declining this acceptance, working in research for a year, and reapplying seems reasonable. Make sure that you apply broadly (including outside Cali). There's good reason why so many Cali premeds get their degrees from med schools in places like OH and MI.
 
By what basis is a premed qualified to map out the capitalization and amortization of private vs. federal student loans including consideration of the compensation structure of residency? By what basis is a premed prepared to compare/contrast the basic repayment structures of federal vs. private student loans?

@DrMidlife , would you be willing to explain the differences? I personally didn't see that much of a difference when I compared the two loans.


- Regarding federal loans: Yes, the COM could have been eligible for federal loans next year based on the College of Pharmacy being approved, but CNU turned it down. The Pharmacy students were rightly indignant (to put it mildly), while the COM students were surprised, but hadn't been counting on federal loans being available anyhow. The stated reasoning behind turning Uncle Sam down was that accepting federal loans at this stage would have opened the COM side of the school up to unplanned audits as wells as more regulatory compliance burden than the administrative side of the school is currently equipped to handle--CNU decided that this was an organizational liability and should be deferred until the COM has full accreditation (however CNU as a whole is eligible again in <2 years). I was personally somewhat disappointed with this decision too, but understand why it could be considered a prudent decision from their perspective if true (after all, it does seem like many people are out for CNU’s blood).

>> Current CNU students can get loans through Sallie Mae (fixed rate or variable rate loans) as well as the iHelp loans (variable rate, which is 3.5-7.5% + 3-month LIBOR... LIBOR, btw has never spiked much even in a down economy---look at a graph of the past 10 years of LIBOR rates). For perspective, I have the iHelp loan and had 60K in existing federal loan debt plus my M1 year loans (I borrowed full COA: 55K tuition + living expenses. On par with most private medical school tuition)---For my M2 year loans, my effective APR is 5.875% and has deferments for residency built in. I had/have no significant past income or assets, just credit cards and utility bills for credit history. In my mind it's not too bad of a deal--all you really miss out on is public service loan forgiveness.

EDIT: At one point I also inquired about what would happen in the event that I am unable to get my loans renewed the following year. I was informed that this scenario had played out with a small number of Pharmacy students over the years and that in those instances the school authorized "emergency financial aid" (I'm unsure what that actually means) to allow them to continue uninterrupted.
 
Last edited:
Any assumption that CNU is acting in good faith on behalf of its students' financial welfare should be discarded. The misinformation here is astonishing.

Administrative overhead is (a) really hard on a business' revenue stream and (b) PART OF BEING A DEGREE-GRANTING INSTITUTION IN THE UNITED STATES. More than 150 med schools in the US are getting it done. Carib schools get it done. You are being directly screwed by CNU's imaginative revenue-protection "antics".

CNU has already demonstrated that it doesn't respect the accreditation processes required for professional training. This is The Better Call Saul School of Discount Doctor Stuff.

Go to studentloans.gov and find the repayment page. Get up to speed on on PAYE and REPAYE.

Start following external sources of information on CNU and on federal loan reform.
 
Thank you for your input DrMidlife.

Alright, well -- to the audience at large, let me make this argument then. Say that I was a Pre-Med student who became very disillusioned with the medical school admissions process over the years and was willing to accept less favorable financials because I wanted OUT of being a pre-med as long as I was at a U.S. school (or else pretend that my only other option was paying full OOS tuition at U. South Carolina or UIC, for argument's sake---MD schools with completely unseemly tuition practices).

Even if you view the business side of the school as completely repugnant, on the educational side of things, as I have told @Goro privately, I haven't seen a problem with how CNU faculty have been conducting themselves.

I would say our professors have all the typical Med Ed. mentality and academic sensibilities and I feel that they sincerely care about our futures, well-being, and improving the school.

They are making appropriate headway/due diligence in improving their educational program. This is not to say that everything has been perfect from day 1---being the guinea pigs for testing and fine-tuning the curriculum does come with its *great* many day to day annoyances as a student. That being said, I know that future classes won't have to deal with a majority of the bugs that the inaugural class encountered because I have seen (and there are several students heavily involved with) the planned curricular changes/improvements. To that end---CNU has a good organizational structure in place for quality improvement and transparency about those changes: all the major educational committees at CNU have voting student members: Curriculum, Assessments, Admissions, Evaluations; there are others and additional subcommittees (e.g. Curriculum Phase A, etc.) that have additional student members in an advisory capacity.

I suppose this is a very roundabout way of saying: Even if the business office doesn't have a soul, CNU does. There are enough well-meaning students and faculty that we will make it to the other side of MD relatively unscathed in spite of all the flak being directed our way. The students here are making satisfactory progress and are consistently outscoring the national medians for our NBME systems block final exams. This is by no means an all-defining measure of success or effectiveness and I do not represent it as such, but to say that CNU is a lost cause without direction is hyperbolic at this early stage. I doubt LCME would have approved the class size increase from 60 to 90 if we were about to be DOA (btw, the class size increase was approved after the federal loan situation had already played out). If I did not sense enough of a good-faith effort by the medical education faculty here on an ongoing basis to do right by us, I would not speak up in support of the school.

@AquamanForever , as I tell everyone else, weigh your options and decide where you can meet the goals you have set for yourself. If academics is your calling, then I agree that reapplying in hopes of attaining a better pedigree will open more doors for you. But don't be a sheep. Think for yourself.

@gyngyn @GrapesofRath , The Physiology dept. and COM admissions are completely separate entities. They [admissions] keep tabs on us, but seem only to take just enough of u$ to keep the program self-sustaining. Last year (during the program year) there were all of 8 outright interviews of current SMP students; the remaining 5 were given out after last-minute cancellations (total of 13) by my count. Suffice to say that it's a long, dark tunnel when you're on the wrong side of pre-med. UC's 10th percentile GPA was a 3.51 for 2019 (and I assume it continued to rise with c/o 2020)--- admissions there these days is about as holistic as applying for a mortgage. We could see the writing on the wall and made the best decision we could given the information available at the time. A perhaps risky U.S. MD is less risk to a pre-med than no MD. I have shared my candid musings about the pros and cons of CNUCOM to the program's director already. None of us regret our decision to come here even if other things might have worked out in a year or two. If that ever changes and I feel sorry for myself, I'll chat up the venerable DrMidlife for my sympathy pep-talk 😉 .
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your input DrMidlife.

Alright, well -- to the audience at large, let me make this argument then. Say that I was a Pre-Med student who became very disillusioned with the medical school admissions process over the years and was willing to accept less favorable financials because I wanted OUT of being a pre-med as long as I was at a U.S. school (or else pretend that my only other option was paying full OOS tuition at U. South Carolina or UIC, for argument's sake---MD schools with completely unseemly tuition practices).

Even if you view the business side of the school as completely repugnant, on the educational side of things, as I have told @Goro privately, I haven't seen a problem with how CNU faculty have been conducting themselves.

I would say our professors have all the typical Med Ed. mentality and academic sensibilities and I feel that they sincerely care about our futures, well-being, and improving the school.

They are making appropriate headway/due diligence in improving their educational program. This is not to say that everything has been perfect from day 1---being the guinea pigs for testing and fine-tuning the curriculum does come with its *great* many day to day annoyances as a student. That being said, I know that future classes won't have to deal with a majority of the bugs that the inaugural class encountered because I have seen (and there are several students heavily involved with) the planned curricular changes/improvements. To that end---CNU has a good organizational structure in place for quality improvement and transparency about those changes: all the major educational committees at CNU have voting student members: Curriculum, Assessments, Admissions, Evaluations; there are others and additional subcommittees (e.g. Curriculum Phase A, etc.) that have additional student members in an advisory capacity.

I suppose this is a very roundabout way of saying: Even if the business office doesn't have a soul, CNU does. There are enough well-meaning students and faculty that we will make it to the other side of MD relatively unscathed in spite of all the flak being directed our way. The students here are making satisfactory progress and are consistently outscoring the national medians for our NBME systems block final exams. This is by no means an all-defining measure of success or effectiveness and I do not represent it as such, but to say that CNU is a lost cause without direction is hyperbolic at this early stage. I doubt LCME would have approved the class size increase from 60 to 90 if we were about to be DOA (btw, the class size increase was approved after the federal loan situation had already played out). If I did not sense enough of a good-faith effort by the medical education faculty here on an ongoing basis to do right by us, I would not speak up in support of the school.

@AquamanForever , as I tell everyone else, weigh your options and decide where you can meet the goals you have set for yourself. If academics is your calling, then I agree that reapplying in hopes of attaining a better pedigree will open more doors for you. But don't be a sheep. Think for yourself.

@gyngyn @GrapesofRath , The Physiology dept. and COM admissions are completely separate entities. They [admissions] keep tabs on us, but seem only to take just enough of u$ to keep the program self-sustaining. Last year (during the program year) there were all of 8 outright interviews of current SMP students; the remaining 5 were given out after last-minute cancellations (total of 13) by my count. Suffice to say that it's a long, dark tunnel when you're on the wrong side of pre-med. UC's 10th percentile GPA was a 3.51 for 2019 (and I assume it continued to rise with c/o 2020)--- admissions there these days is about as wholistic as applying for a mortgage. We could see the writing on the wall and made the best decision we could given the information available at the time. A perhaps risky U.S. MD is less risk to a pre-med than no MD. I have shared my candid musings about the pros and cons of CNUCOM to the program's director already. None of us regret our decision to come here even if other things might have worked out in a year or two. If that ever changes and I feel sorry for myself, I'll chat up the venerable DrMidlife for my sympathy pep-talk 😉 .
Confirmation bias aside, I do not blame you for your decision. I do not even blame the reprehensible owners of this monstrosity/ "university." After all, this is just a business proposition to them. I blame the LCME. Until they calcify their spine (or at least hire some real lawyers) this abomination will be allowed to continue. Admittedly, I only have evidence of lying and cheating. But I have found that where these flower, stealing cannot be far behind. I hope it is no more than money they are taking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@gyngyn @GrapesofRath , The Physiology dept. and COM admissions are completely separate entities. They [admissions] keep tabs on us, but seem only to take just enough of u$ to keep the program self-sustaining. Last year (during the program year) there were all of 8 outright interviews of current SMP students; the remaining 5 were given out after last-minute cancellations (total of 13) by my count. Suffice to say that it's a long, dark tunnel when you're on the wrong side of pre-med. UC's 10th percentile GPA was a 3.51 for 2019 (and I assume it continued to rise with c/o 2020)--- admissions there these days is about as holistic as applying for a mortgage. We could see the writing on the wall and made the best decision we could given the information available at the time. A perhaps risky U.S. MD is less risk to a pre-med than no MD. I have shared my candid musings about the pros and cons of CNUCOM to the program's director already. None of us regret our decision to come here even if other things might have worked out in a year or two. If that ever changes and I feel sorry for myself, I'll chat up the venerable DrMidlife for my sympathy pep-talk 😉 .

Thanks for coming on here and sharing your side. Alot of the story here for you is still TBD as Im sure you are well aware. Come clinical rotations, come applying for residency, come match day, those will be the times you can probably best assess CNU and where it led you. It's quite possible you come back here in two years having matched into a field and program you were very satisfied with. We'll just have to see: the dynamics of CNU, how they are perceived by others(including PDs which is something thatll be very relevant to you before you know it) is something that isnt exactly defined and will remain fluid. Much of how things will evolve(or devolve) 5 years from now isnt going to be predictable.

Like others have said I dont blame you particularly at all. It's just a tough spot all the way around. SMP's are pressure cookers. The stress, the fear, the perssure, it never ends. Every test feels like your career is on the line. The fear mongering and constant "Better ace this or your career is over" mentality is constant. Im sure you are aware there were tons of people who waited until this cycle from UC's SMP that were successful. Despite all the raised competition the same old norms held true. About 3/4 of people who started out in the SMP got into US MD schools. Cincinnati accepted about half thee graduates(13 for your year). So I would argue even though the competition was fierce Cincinnati still held up their end of the deal. If you performed according to the same standards, you were rewarded accordingly more or less. Having said that, that perspective is incredibly hard to keep when things dont look so bright(which is the case for most at some point or another in an SMP). I can guarantee 75% of the class didnt think they would end up at a US MD the whole time. So in the moment of pressure, it's easy to see how someone who might have some doubt could take the bait that was out their with CNU. It's hard not to. Like others have said, the fault lies with CNU and LCME not the students.

The purpose of threads like these isnt really to make it about people who've already committed to CNU. It's much more about providing awareness and perspective to those from a far. We've already had 1 US MD ADCOM on here talk about how this was the first they were hearing about this and shocked to hear the extent to which CNU had been doing certain things. The more awareness can be spread, the better everybody is and they can use that information to make whatever decision they felt is best just like you. But getting that awareness spread, and spread fast enough, is often what is more challenging.

Maybe it was somewhat disheartening to see many who waited from the SMP get rewarded with US MD acceptances at far less controversial schools. Or maybe it wasnt for you. At the end of the day all this comes down to is you is in times like that, in moments like that under stress and when things are difficult, you just have to make a decision you can live with for the rest of your life. It sounds like youve done that. And that's really all that matters at the end of the day .We can sit here and nitpick "Oh you probably would have gotten in if you waited a year to another MD look at all these other people in your class" or "DO might be better than CNU" or whatever have you but what's done is done. All you can do is go forward with all you got and no regrets. The fortunate news out of all this is that's something you probably know all to well better than most in your position. Youve already faced a good deal of stress, pressure, and high stake decision making so early in your medical career. Those things don't just go away, they become more and more numerous as you go on as we all know and experiences like these can shape you for the better in a way not much else can if you let them.
 
Last edited:
Gyngyn, That's fair---I'm sure you see things I don't see and vice versa. Thanks for hearing me out.
 
Last edited:
How many of the matriculating class are still enrolled?


Thank you for your input DrMidlife.

Alright, well -- to the audience at large, let me make this argument then. Say that I was a Pre-Med student who became very disillusioned with the medical school admissions process over the years and was willing to accept less favorable financials because I wanted OUT of being a pre-med as long as I was at a U.S. school (or else pretend that my only other option was paying full OOS tuition at U. South Carolina or UIC, for argument's sake---MD schools with completely unseemly tuition practices).
 
I have reason to believe that they are benefiting from the issuance of the loans.
Many other things. When I have proof, I will post.

I attended undergrad in SoCal and have 2 male friends at CNU and they keep me regularly updated with what's going on in the school. I also interviewed at the school. Here are their thoughts with my observations from interview day.
- The facilities are really cool and shiny but the school has some serious structural problems, most seriously the lack of experienced faculty. You will learn medicine from Kaplan videos and through textbooks on your own. My friends stay home and pretty much watch Kaplan and Najeeb videos for hours and do practice question through third-party resources. But do you know what you can't learn from online videos: patient care skills. They cover one topic a month and practice on one another because they don't have standardized patients. The Dean is the one that runs this course because he's one of the few people in the school that has the previous experience training students. The school also just got their class expansion approved by the LCME. I thought that was weird because they haven't even graduated a class yet. I thought it was a red flag during the interview because I was thinking about the small faculty size and how they would adjust for even more students.

Now, will these students pass the boards and match? I have no doubt. Why? Because they are CA students who did extremely well on their MCAT but were lacking in the social aspect of medicine (poor LORs or interviewing skills). It's really hard to explain this unless you attended a UC school for undergrad. CA pre-meds are different. They work extremely hard because of the crazy competition in the state. The student body reflects this.

Now for the fun part! The student loans! This was one of the main reasons I had to turn down my acceptance. The plan is to pay off your undergrad Department of Education (DOE) loans with a Sallie Mae loans because the DOE might not let you skip payment for soo long. Some of the current students don't fully realize this but Sallie Mae has a cap and most students will probably end up going to another loan provider for help (Wells Fargo probably). The interest on the second loan will be very high because they will know about the Sallie Mae balance from your credit score sheet. Even if they approve, this is not ideal for repayment because you might end up having to make 2 monthly payments after you graduate instead of 1 when you start your residency. You will also not be qualified for any of the loan forgiveness programs that the NIH or Medicare offer for doctors that practice in under-served areas. This is where I have a personal beef with the school because I was born in the CA Valley and personally know how desperate this area is for specialists but CNU's tuition program really makes it hard for students to practice here. Anyway. Moving on. No, they will not have federal loans. They explicitly mentioned it during the interview making them the only medical school in the country that isn't Title IX compliant, doesn't have an institutional Title IX officer, and isn't qualified for federal loans.
 
The black bolded text is a major red flag, and applies directly to what I have bolded in red.

CNU students may very well pass Boards, but from what you describe, they will be a disaster on the wards. Students who go into rotations with limited clinical skills are establishing a bad reputation for their school, and site directors pick up on this immediately.

It's some ways, it's almost the reverse of the newest and poorly taught DO schools. The DO students may know a lot, but won';t learn anything clinical. The CNU students will know little, and thus be handicapped when trying to learn clinical things.

My gawd!


- The facilities are really cool and shiny but the school has some serious structural problems, most seriously the lack of experienced faculty. You will learn medicine from Kaplan videos and through textbooks on your own. My friends stay home and pretty much watch Kaplan and Najeeb videos for hours and do practice question through third-party resources. But do you know what you can't learn from online videos: patient care skills. They cover one topic a month and practice on one another because they don't have standardized patients. The Dean is the one that runs this course because he's one of the few people in the school that has the previous experience training students. The school also just got their class expansion approved by the LCME. I thought that was weird because they haven't even graduated a class yet. I thought it was a red flag during the interview because I was thinking about the small faculty size and how they would adjust for even more students.

Now, will these students pass the boards and match? I have no doubt. Why? Because they are CA students who did extremely well on their MCAT but were lacking in the social aspect of medicine (poor LORs or interviewing skills). It's really hard to explain this unless you attended a UC school for undergrad. CA pre-meds are different. They work extremely hard because of the crazy competition in the state. The student body reflects this.Moving on. No, they will not have federal loans. They explicitly mentioned it during the interview making them the only medical school in the country that isn't Title IX compliant, doesn't have an institutional Title IX officer, and isn't qualified for federal loans.
 
@Goro 60/60 still alive and kicking.

@Henry101 where are you getting this from / when exactly did you interview?
- We have SP encounters every single week, other than Sim lab weeks. And yes, there are some Najeeber's among us (though Najeeb is definitely not for me). I don't deny that these are necessary supplements for the inaugural class (News flash: I used many such things last year too--supplemental material isn't exactly unique to CNU). We have to fill in the blanks when something doesn't line up or make sense and suggest a fix after the fact. If your friend expected to come to any brand new school and not have to do this sort of self-directed learning and error resolving then I'd say this is a healthy growing experience for them. Regarding aggregate borrowing limits, this also is not news---I noted this issue last year and gave my financial rationale for it in last year's application thread.

I also happen to disagree about OSCE instruction. I think our clinical faculty are quite strong as most of them are either still in practice or very recently retired from it. We have been amply supplied with helpful outside connections and learning opportunities by the clinical faculty here (or at least, those who chose to seek it have been).
 
Last edited:
Current CNU student here. I was in a similar position as you, OP, last summer -- right down to the LizzyM and alma mater (go bears!).

There is a lot of misinformation in this thread (not sure who started the no-standardized-patients rumor, but as @GnomeBeGone said it is 100% false) and it scares me that it's being spread around. I'd recommend people considering CNU to do their own research rather than blindly rely on what an anonymous poster said on SDN. OP, please PM me if you want my two cents. I can say without hesitation that I do not have a single regret about choosing CNU.
 
Confirmation bias aside, I do not blame you for your decision. I do not even blame the reprehensible owners of this monstrosity/ "university." After all, this is just a business proposition to them. I blame the LCME. Until they calcify their spine (or at least hire some real lawyers) this abomination will be allowed to continue. Admittedly, I only have evidence of lying and cheating. But I have found that where these flower, stealing cannot be far behind. I hope it is no more than money they are taking.

My findings are highly inconsistent with what would be expected observations if your claims about the school were accurate. Though since I'll elect not to share most of those findings for reasons of privacy and professionalism I can't expect you to lend much weight to that statement.

Instead I'll ask a question: How much calcium you think the US Armed Forces have in their spines? Considering how exceptionally quickly the military began granting scholarships to CNU CoM students it would appear that the school meets their standards and they expect the students from the school to graduate ready for service. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that you are extrapolating overmuch from limited information in light of the vote of confidence from one of the single most powerful organizations on the planet which, I imagine, employs quite a number of "real lawyers.".
 
My findings are highly inconsistent with what would be expected observations if your claims about the school were accurate. Though since I'll elect not to share most of those findings for reasons of privacy and professionalism I can't expect you to lend much weight to that statement.

Instead I'll ask a question: How much calcium you think the US Armed Forces have in their spines? Considering how exceptionally quickly the military began granting scholarships to CNU CoM students it would appear that the school meets their standards and they expect the students from the school to graduate ready for service. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that you are extrapolating overmuch from limited information in light of the vote of confidence from one of the single most powerful organizations on the planet which, I imagine, employs quite a number of "real lawyers.".
Hmm I see what you're saying but personally I'd expect gyngyn to know a little more about the situation than the military.
 
Hmm I see what you're saying but personally I'd expect gyngyn to know a little more about the situation than the military.

I really don't see how gyngyn can be expected to have any expertise on the situation given that his or her access to information is not much beyond the layperson and what's actually going on at the school has little to no effect on him/her. In contrast, the military has to spend resources and commitments on the students it awards scholarships to and there would presumably be repercussions for those who approved the school if it turned out it was a "monstrosity" committing fraud and churning out sub-par graduates.
 
My findings are highly inconsistent with what would be expected observations if your claims about the school were accurate. Though since I'll elect not to share most of those findings for reasons of privacy and professionalism I can't expect you to lend much weight to that statement.

Instead I'll ask a question: How much calcium you think the US Armed Forces have in their spines? Considering how exceptionally quickly the military began granting scholarships to CNU CoM students it would appear that the school meets their standards and they expect the students from the school to graduate ready for service. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that you are extrapolating overmuch from limited information in light of the vote of confidence from one of the single most powerful organizations on the planet which, I imagine, employs quite a number of "real lawyers.".
The military has been known to make errors.
Offering military careers to these poor matriculants, however, is not one of them.
Given the students' (bad) loan options, the military would be remiss not to step into the breach.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look, y'all CNU students and prospective students, separate two things in your heads:

1. Quality of education which is not being questioned in this thread by doctors trying to help you
2. Quality of organization which is being questioned in this thread by doctors trying to help you

As with Caribbean schools, CNU makes doctors while trying to make money. The enjoyability of that process belongs to the students. The accreditability of that process belongs to LCME and CNU. The ethics of that process are in question by me and by @gyngyn. The consequences of CNU's crappy ethics will not be borne by CNU, but by you.

If you are considering CNU as a med school, you would be wise to understand that a med school not offering federal financial aid at the earliest possible time is not acting on behalf of its students in any way.

If you are currently a student at CNU, you would be wise to start reading the SDN forums about clinical rotations, board exams, and residency application. In your shoes I would not trust CNU to do a competent job of establishing the relationships you need for your clinical rotations to be something other than a huge pain in your ass.

tl;dr: military scholarships, standardized patients, and how nice everybody seems are separate issues from financial aid. maturity is the ability to hold opposing concepts in your head at one time.

Best of luck to you.
 
So @gyngyn and @DrMidlife, we are agreed that graduates of CNU will meet the standards of what an MD is supposed to be at that stage educationally? If so, I would appreciate if you made it clear when voicing your concerns that the quality of the students is not in question since, if that isn't done, how we fare come residency admissions may be harmed by an unjustified negative reputation (e.g. @Goro gratuitously predicting we will be a disaster on the wards and have inferior clinical knowledge).

I share your concerns about the financial situation of many of my classmates upon graduation since being in massive debt still accruing interest is not a good place to be (but is unfortunately quite common across the entirety of the US medical education system). However, I don't believe that financial predation is occurring and, whether or not the it was correct, turning down Title IV was a decision made in good faith with the best interests of the students at heart. This is based on multiple meetings and conversations with a number of people high up in the organization whom I have very good reason to trust. Again, I'm not saying the decision was wise or correct as that is beyond my ability to directly judge, but that it is not evidence of unethical behaviors or practices.
 
The LCME has made preliminary plans to salvage students caught by any lapse in accreditation if failure to meet standards is not addressed.
The owners of the school behaved badly, not the students.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is based on multiple meetings and conversations with a number of people high up in the organization whom I have very good reason to trust. Again, I'm not saying the decision was wise or correct as that is beyond my ability to directly judge, but that it is not evidence of unethical behaviors or practices.
Your trust is understandable, given your situation, but sadly misplaced.
Your financial predicament is not normal. The owners chose not to allow federally insured loans for their students. What did they give you for their rationale?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your trust is misplaced.
Your trust is understandable, given your situation, but sadly misplaced.

You know little to nothing about me or why I consider these individuals trustworthy. Your flippant dismissal of the careful process by which I assign trust and evaluate the veracity of important statements made to me is condescending.
 
You know little to nothing about me or why I consider these individuals trustworthy. Your flippant dismissal of the careful process by which I assign trust and evaluate the veracity of important statements made to me is condescending.
Tell me how they explained it then, so I can understand.
 
Tell me how they explained it then, so I can understand.

The university administration was of the belief that the private loan terms they had secured for students were on par with or were better than those for federal loans. Given that signing on to Title IV would have created substantial legal and bureaucratic costs for the school, which translate to risk, restriction, and cost in time/money, it was felt that that signing would not be in the best interests of the school, nor the students whose tuition and available services may have been negatively effected by the school's expenditures of time and money without students seeing a commensurate benefit (at least in the assessment of administration).
 
I've never had an LCME official ask if we would be willing to take students before.
When SJB lost accreditation we only had pleas from students.

Well if that plays out, show me mercy and grant advance standing. I think I'd rather shoot myself than take Foundations of Medicine again at a 3rd med school 😉 lol
 
The fact that they are making contingency plans is telling.
Having a teach out plan is required of any new LCME school. It's federal law under the Higher Education Opportunity Act.

To give a specific citation: H.R 4137 Part H §495-496

So to be clear @Goro, I agree it's telling that the school is in compliance with the law.
 
The university administration was of the belief that the private loan terms they had secured for students were on par with or were better than those for federal loans. Given that signing on to Title IV would have created substantial legal and bureaucratic costs for the school, which translate to risk, restriction, and cost in time/money, it was felt that that signing would not be in the best interests of the school, nor the students whose tuition and available services may have been negatively effected by the school's expenditures of time and money without students seeing a commensurate benefit (at least in the assessment of administration).
They told you that private loans were in your best interest?
Did they tell you how they managed to secure these terms?
What were the risks and restrictions that they avoided by this choice?
How about re-payment options that those with government loans can use?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They told you that private loans were in your best interest?
Did they tell you how they managed to secure these terms?
We were told that access to federal loans would on balance ultimately not have benefited us.

I didn't inquire, but if its important to you I can do so and relay what I find. I would presume they did so through means like demonstrating history of students paying their loans (i.e that loans to CNU students are low risk) to negotiate down interest rates, but banking and loans are not my area of expertise.
 
Top