**ACHIEVER scores versus REAL test scores

[butterfly411]

---

Members do not see this ad.

I've taken test one and two on the achiever scoring 16 and 17 respectively on the PAT section. I'm losing confidence🙁 -has anyone experienced something similar but did better on the PAT section on the real DAT test? please share your scores, if you don't mind

thanks.

 

[klutzy1987]

look at any of my posts on achiever and look on my post about my DAT today i was wondering the same thing until i took my DAT for real. On achiever i got a 17 18 and 19 and on the actual DAT i got a 24. Achiever is awful and it doesnt accurately represent what you will get on the real thing. Use crack for the PAT and Just ignore whatever you got on their cubes section and assume that you got all of the cubes right. They have rediculous illusions and there are no such illusions on the actual DAT.

 

[sl2obel2ts]

achiever bio is lil harder, but it is comparable. gc and oc are on par. rc is super easier. pat is wayyyy harder