Achiever vs. DAT

[ryry]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

ok fellas...

I took my first Achiever test today and it was pretty demoralizing.
I studied with TS and Kaplan up until last week. Got started with Destroyer this weekend and about 1/2 through it.

My TS scroes were: AA/TS/PAT

20/19/23
21/20/22
24/22/22

I took the science section and pat section of my first achiever TS/PAT
18/20

Both sections on achiever were definitely harder and I am wondering which program is more similar in difficulty to the actual DAT.

anyone?

 

[klutzy1987]

ok fellas...

I took my first Achiever test today and it was pretty demoralizing.
I studied with TS and Kaplan up until last week. Got started with Destroyer this weekend and about 1/2 through it.

My TS scroes were: AA/TS/PAT

20/19/23
21/20/22
24/22/22

I took the science section and pat section of my first achiever TS/PAT
18/20

Both sections on achiever were definitely harder and I am wondering which program is more similar in difficulty to the actual DAT.

anyone?

Achiever is more difficult than the acual DAT in every section other than RC where it is way too easy.

 

[sessllh]

I think they don't represent the real DAT especially bio section. there were so many lab questions that I had to recall from my previous classes i took. also i found RC and QR to be more difficult than any other practice tests. haha maybe it's just me.. i think with those practice scores you are getting and by the time when you finish your destroyer, you will be well prepared for the test. oh, I saw few questions on the real dat bio that were nearly identical to the destroyer's bio problems. haha, good luck with your test!!!!!