• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Actions in response to elevated INRs

Started by pinkyrx
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

pinkyrx

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
For those of you who have experience working/rotating in anticoagulation clinics (both hospital or clinic based)...

At what point do you send a patient with an elevated INR to the emergency room? Let's say they're not actually bleeding and have no signs/symptoms. Do you send them to the ER if INR is >5.0?

If you're in a clinic do you send them to the ER or do you administer Vitamin K on site? Does it make a difference if your working in a clinic vs. working in a hospital/VA type environment where the ER is almost next door?

Also, how closely do your physicians/pharmacists follow the CHEST guidelines on administration of Vitamin K? Do you see people using IM/IV Vitamin K very often in situations where PO is obviously a better choice?
 
For those of you who have experience working/rotating in anticoagulation clinics (both hospital or clinic based)...

At what point do you send a patient with an elevated INR to the emergency room? Let's say they're not actually bleeding and have no signs/symptoms. Do you send them to the ER if INR is >5.0?

If you're in a clinic do you send them to the ER or do you administer Vitamin K on site? Does it make a difference if your working in a clinic vs. working in a hospital/VA type environment where the ER is almost next door?

Also, how closely do your physicians/pharmacists follow the CHEST guidelines on administration of Vitamin K? Do you see people using IM/IV Vitamin K very often in situations where PO is obviously a better choice?

If the patient is hemodynamically stable and shows no signs of bleeding (gums, bruises, blood in urine), but INR>5, I would just withold warfarin.

In addition, I would find out why the patient's INR>5.

Vit K might not be needed and deciding when to use it is complicated. Risk factors that might require the use of Vit K (w/o bleeding) includes elderly, unstable heart failure; cancer.

http://www.dml.co.nz/inr.asp
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/135/6/S37
http://vitualis.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/how-to-reverse-warfarin/
http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/36/section13.html
 
> 10 and potentially bleeding gets them a seat in the ER waiting room.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Why 10 and not 9? I thought the guideline category was [ INR > 9 with bleeding ]

Ok sure, greater than or equal to 10. I was just saying it had to be high, and I think 9 is the number because assays cannot determine the INR once it reaches that point. But thanks sport.
 
Ok sure, greater than or equal to 10. I was just saying it had to be high, and I think 9 is the number because assays cannot determine the INR once it reaches that point. But thanks sport.

I wasn't trying to be nit-picky or challenge your knowledge on the subject. Sorry if my question came across a little aggressive.