Last edited:
I think it's the same. Capillary action occurs because of water in a small enough diameter tube of some sort, not because of weaker/stronger hydrogen bonding.
Capillary action occurs because of strong attraction between the molecules of the liquid and the molecules of the wall of the container. I'm tempted to say D - stronger attraction to the walls will just make for steeper edge of the liquid meniscus but the effect should be observable in any case when there is strong enough attraction with the container.
you're right. but that's where small diameter comes in. when diameter is small enough, the "meniscus" formation causes the upward movement. if diameter increases, then a real meniscus forms and no capillary action happens.
but it seems the answer is A. why wouldn't it be C?
I think that the answer relied upon understanding that "water rising" meant that an upward force, due to capillary action, was acting on the liquid water. The forces between the water and the walls, (the soil in this case) will cause this upward force on the liquid.
Looked to Hyprphysics: Capillary action occurs when the adhesion to the walls is stronger than the cohesive forces between the liquid molecules . So, if ever capillary action occurs it's because adhesion > cohesion. So answer is A.
Answer A seems obvious to me based on the fact that water has a meniscus due to it "climbing" up whatever container you put it in. But if that's improper reasoning, then I have no clue 🙁