Advancements in Optometry?

This forum made possible through the generous support of
SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

enedionwe

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I seen from a couple of people that they believe that in a couple years Optometrist will be able to practice minor eye surgeries. I wanted to know if anyone knows if this is true, or heared about any other advancements in this field or research?
 
I wouldn't hedge my bets in either direction.

Here are the changes I forsee:

1. Contact lenses will become very biocompatible. Meaning they will be very safe, comfortable, and able to be worn for long periods of time.

2. A lot of treatments that used to require lasers or other surgeries are becoming treatable with pharmaceuticals. I believe that for example the ARMD injections will eventually be available in topical (eye drop) form and Rx'able by ODs.

There are very few surgeries that I would really want to do. Lasers should be available to ODs. I'd like to do NLDO probes and injections, but besides that I have no interest in trabs, cataracts, blephroplasty, and vitrectomies.
 
Surgery depends on your definition. ODs see it one way, MDs and OMDs want it defined another way... This is where it will all get stuck.
However, I also think that lots of ODs and OD students have absolutely no interest in doing surgeries as the poster above mentioned. I am one of those. I don't mind advancement of the profession and I love that we're advancing in medical treatments and oral treatment options, but I don't want to cut. If I did, I'd be in ophthalmology, not optometry.
 
Surgery depends on your definition. ODs see it one way, MDs and OMDs want it defined another way... This is where it will all get stuck.
However, I also think that lots of ODs and OD students have absolutely no interest in doing surgeries as the poster above mentioned. I am one of those. I don't mind advancement of the profession and I love that we're advancing in medical treatments and oral treatment options, but I don't want to cut. If I did, I'd be in ophthalmology, not optometry.

Whatever, ur not smart enough to get in med school, why else would u pick optometry. I know ur not smart because of what u said. U make OMD seem like they got some sort of degree that can be as easily obtained as OD degree. WRONG!!!!
 
Whatever, ur not smart enough to get in med school, why else would u pick optometry. I know ur not smart because of what u said. U make OMD seem like they got some sort of degree that can be as easily obtained as OD degree. WRONG!!!!


What? Please speak english. 😕
 
What? Please speak english. 😕

Seriously, can we please stop with the "u" instead of you and the "ur" instead of your or you're.

This isn't text messaging with your friends, it's a site for future health PROFESSIONALS.
 
Seriously, can we please stop with the "u" instead of you and the "ur" instead of your or you're.

This isn't text messaging with your friends, it's a site for future health PROFESSIONALS.

Thank god someone said it ! Thanks, ODduck.

When people type in "text" speak it makes you sound ignorant and uneducated.. no matter what you say. (and I have no idea what they were trying to say in that last post) 😕
 
I would like to see when Avastin or Lucentis are in topical solution form, it would make a lot of people's life much easier, and also painless 🙂

on another note, can optometrist do simple surgery like chalazion excision?
 
I would like to see when Avastin or Lucentis are in topical solution form, it would make a lot of people's life much easier, and also painless 🙂

on another note, can optometrist do simple surgery like chalazion excision?

Yes.
 
I seen from a couple of people that they believe that in a couple years Optometrist will be able to practice minor eye surgeries. I wanted to know if anyone knows if this is true, or heared about any other advancements in this field or research?

I don't know about you, but I have never had "minor" surgery. Anything that involves penetrating tissue and the risk of pain/bleeding/infection is not minor when it involves my body. I suspect that most patients feel the same way. Any "minor" procedure has the risk of complications that could become "major" problems.
 
I thought the general rule was if you don't have to close it up with sutures then you can do it...😕
 
I hope so.

My advice is that you should make sure you are comfortable with being an optometrist in the profession as it exists right now. If you are going into optometry with the idea that the scope of practice will be significantly different when you graduate, you are setting yourself up for frustration and disappointment. I started optometry school in 1996, graduated in 2000, and left to start med school in 2003. The scope of practice today for the average optometrist in 2008 is not significantly different than the scope that existed when I first entered optometry school back in 1996.
 
I thought the general rule was if you don't have to close it up with sutures then you can do it...😕

I am not sure where you heard that, but I would recheck your sources. Optometry is a profession that is governed by state laws rather than "general rules." However, I am not aware of any state that allows optometrists to perform any surgery or procedure simply because it does not require sutures. If that were the case, optometrists would be doing LASIK, lumbar punctures, retinal laser photocoagulation, retrobulbar blocks, abscess I&Ds, etc.

If the only difference between optometry training and ophthalmology training was that ophthalmologists learn how to throw sutures, I would be the first to advocate merging the two professions. But the differences between the two professions extend beyond the ability to close a surgical wound with sutures.

Every part of a surgery is important. This includes pre-operative evaluation/counseling, preparation, anesthesia, incision, the actual procedure, closure, perioperative care, and post-operative follow-up. Closure is imporant, but it is only part of the big picture. It's the stuff that happens between incision and closure that can really rock someone's world -- in a good way or a bad way. That being said, all the other components can affect outcomes as well. Poor counseling can lead to inappropriate expectations and poor perceived outcomes. Improper preparation of a surgical field can lead to complications. Improper anesthesia can be deleterious in many ways. Poor incisions will affect closure and healing. Bad closure can lead to dehiscence of the wound, suture granulomas, etc. Poor follow-up care will cause failure of early detection of post-op complications. Surgery, no matter how minor you think it is, can be more complicated than initially thought. A good surgeon goes into a procedure with not only a plan A and a plan B, but plans A, B, C, D, E, etc. Things can go awry, and a surgeon should anticipate these complications and be able to adapt. I would argue that anyone who trivializes surgery has no business doing surgery.
 
I don't know about you, but I have never had "minor" surgery. Anything that involves penetrating tissue and the risk of pain/bleeding/infection is not minor when it involves my body. I suspect that most patients feel the same way. Any "minor" procedure has the risk of complications that could become "major" problems.


Do you consider tatoos and ear piercings surgery? Clearly these procedures (which require basically NO training) are beyond the scope of many DOCTORS of optometry. Too me that is an insult and is a clear example of medicine's suppressive tactics.

You have an intersting perspective. If it came into existance, how could the professions be merged? For example, perhaps ODs could be required a 1 year surgical/medical residency before and OMD residency?
 
I would love to see that optometry program offers surgical residency or incorporate minor surgical procedures (and related physiology) into the overall curriculum (again---"minor" surgical procedures)
 
Top