Advice to give my brother about choosing a grade-deflating school

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

coolbeans151

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
41
Reaction score
12
Hi all,

My younger brother is applying to colleges (with an interest in pre-med) and I'm not sure what to advise him about choosing certain schools in the local area (New York) that strongly deflate grades. I'll give two examples that come to mind right away based on many people I know in both schools:

1. Fordham University Lincoln Center (City Campus)
-Fordham is a great business/law school but they are relatively new regarding pre-med
-They try to "teach" the mentality that life isn't fair and that you need to be pushed down over and over again so you learn to get up and keep trying
-Based on gradeinflation.com, their average GPA is a 3.17 (based on what people have told me, pre-med classes have harder grading than non-pre-med classes
-Freshman year, the professors are told to very scarcely give out A's and even B's, and that the freshman should be taught that such grades should not be expected (e.g., <10% get A's/A-'s)
-As you get to upper levels, grading becomes a little more lenient but still, about 10% get A's with the majority getting C's and B's. A significant amount of students, even in upper levels fail.
-A B-/B is considered an extremely "strong and well-earned" grade, maybe because in business grades are not nearly as important as pre-med
-For pre-med, some of the upper-level classes they require to graduate have professors that boast about not giving an A in over four years, and only then did one person "earn" an A
-List goes on and on

2. SUNY Stony Brook
-Not as bad as Fordham, but every pre-med class from gen chem in freshman year to biochem 2 in junior/senior year is bell curved with only 10% getting the A and about another 5% getting the A-.
-By junior/senior year, after a large chunk of the useless students get weeded out, and yet the remaining competitive students are still graded on the same bell curve and many students with previously good grades ending their undergraduate careers with C's or even fail (which looks horrible as a downward trend)
-Average is set to C+/B-


From what I gathered, both schools are currently making a push to be better recognized and more prestigious, so they're really going hard with their grading policies.

I know everyone is probably going to say that if you work hard, you will get that stellar GPA, but at these schools that is simply not true. The students I know from these schools are some of the most motivated, driven, and hardworking people I know and they have okay (~3.2-3.5; significantly above the average pre-med GPA at their schools) GPA's instead of stellar GPA's. These also aren't elite schools like Princeton or Hopkins that are apparently notorious for deflation.

So would the best advice be to simply avoid these schools?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Unless you're at Princeton or MIT, grade deflation will always hurt you as a premed. It would probably be best to avoid these schools if at all possible, but keep in mind that even at schools with "inflation", the sciences are still going to be extremely rigorous with similar medians. He should go to whichever school he feels like he is happiest at, will have the best support system at, and will be able to succeed at.
 
Grade deflation hurts you everywhere - even if you get to attach some awesome name like MIT or Hopkins to your app, you're still at a disadvantage compared to the people at equally well known schools who get an A- for being at the median.

To answer the OP - YES, AVOID THESE SCHOOLS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. They may be gaining some prestige or whatever, but it certainly won't make up for having a 3.3 sGPA. And even if you could work your ass off and manage a solid GPA, you still would have been better off going somewhere that took a lot less effort and freed up time for extracurriculars and socializing.

I'm in the camp that thinks you can be happy almost anywhere you end up attending, so while he shouldn't go to a school based only on their average grades, he should count severe grade deflation as a MAJOR negative when choosing.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Some schools are widely known to be grade deflators: Princeton, MIT, Cornell, Hopkins, Berkeley -- and if you go there, you'll get some slack for the known deflation plus the super-competitive admissions requirement. I wouldn't avoid those particular schools for that reason.

SUNY and Fordham? All the disadvantages without the compensating advantages. There are better choices for a prospective pre-med.
 
Thank you everyone for your honest replies. I will be sure to pass on this information as well as show increased sympathy to my friends/acquaintances who are stuck with these schools!
 
I heard that UChicago was extremely grade deflating also but adcoms consider it along with the others mentioned.
 
I heard that UChicago was extremely grade deflating also but adcoms consider it along with the others mentioned.

Chicago is pretty much in the middle, not a huge deflater like Berkeley or Princeton and not a huge inflater like Dartmouth or Harvard.
 
Go to the school that you will thrive the best in. Selecting a school based on inflating/deflating habits is a recipe for a worse application seasons 3-4 years from now. There are a lot of reasons to pick between schools. This is not one of them. A strong student will do well wherever they are at. I know the sense of academic entitlement is very strong (I worked hard, so I deserve an 'A'!), but really?

Go to undergrad to learn how to think. Learn some material. Develop as an individual. Learn to be a good student. Lay the framework for becoming a good physician and medical schools will want you. It actually IS that simple. To that end, the school that allows you to do those things with the most ease is going to be the best school to go to. While certainly borderline applicants can be harmed (or helped) by the school that they went to, the focus, ESPECIALLY for someone this early in the game should be on not being a borderline applicant in the first place.
 
Go to the school that you will thrive the best in. Selecting a school based on inflating/deflating habits is a recipe for a worse application seasons 3-4 years from now. There are a lot of reasons to pick between schools. This is not one of them. A strong student will do well wherever they are at. I know the sense of academic entitlement is very strong (I worked hard, so I deserve an 'A'!), but really?

Go to undergrad to learn how to think. Learn some material. Develop as an individual. Learn to be a good student. Lay the framework for becoming a good physician and medical schools will want you. It actually IS that simple. To that end, the school that allows you to do those things with the most ease is going to be the best school to go to. While certainly borderline applicants can be harmed (or helped) by the school that they went to, the focus, ESPECIALLY for someone this early in the game should be on not being a borderline applicant in the first place.
Omg this a hundred times over. I can't believe people are trying to coach into going for what school it is easiest to get an A at. You don't go to college as just a small check box for going to med school. You go there to grow tremendously as a person, to develop your mind intellectually, and to branch out in many different ways. Your brother should go to the school he loves where he will thrive as a person and enjoy and be passionate about. The vast majority of people going into college as premeds and wanting to go to med school that still want to go to med school (much less even make it) by the time they graduate is hugely diminished. Betting your whole college experience on "maybe still wanting to go to med school by the time you graduate", and "hopefully I can get an A more easily" is absolutely stupid.
 
Go to undergrad to learn how to think. Learn some material. Develop as an individual. Learn to be a good student. Lay the framework for becoming a good physician and medical schools will want you.

You go there to grow tremendously as a person, to develop your mind intellectually, and to branch out in many different ways.

You can do these things just as easily at one great school vs another regardless of their grading.

If someone has a strong interest in eventually going to medical school, telling them to factor in the competitiveness/grading of a university absolutely makes sense; if someone has offers from Brown and Hopkins, telling them to ignore the half point difference in average GPA is stupid. Yes, they should first narrow down to the schools that "felt good" when they visited/are financial feasible/other major factors. But the huge gap in grading policies very much deserves a spot in the final pros/cons weighing before making a choice along with things like location or size or quality of student housing etc.

And, I love mimelim's philosophy, but his 3.4 at a tough semideflater was countered by killer research and a 99.9th MCAT - he's one hell of an outlier and doing it his way won't work for most. There's definitely a flip side of people sitting on low 3.x's and good (but not app-rescuing) scores/ECs at his alma mater who I've seen advise siblings/prospective visiting students against the "I'm driven, I'm sure I'll excel academically anywhere so long as I love the school!" mindset.
 
Grade deflation hurts you everywhere - even if you get to attach some awesome name like MIT or Hopkins to your app, you're still at a disadvantage compared to the people at equally well known schools who get an A- for being at the median.

To answer the OP - YES, AVOID THESE SCHOOLS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. They may be gaining some prestige or whatever, but it certainly won't make up for having a 3.3 sGPA. And even if you could work your ass off and manage a solid GPA, you still would have been better off going somewhere that took a lot less effort and freed up time for extracurriculars and socializing.

I'm in the camp that thinks you can be happy almost anywhere you end up attending, so while he shouldn't go to a school based only on their average grades, he should count severe grade deflation as a MAJOR negative when choosing.

What schools do this? I know of none. At my top 40 undergrad, C+/B- was the mean for first semester science courses, then B- for the second semester science courses once all of the crap students were weeded out.
 
What schools do this? I know of none. At my top 40 undergrad, C+/B- was the mean for first semester science courses, then B- for the second semester science courses once all of the crap students were weeded out.

Harvard got in trouble recently because they had a median grade of A-, and at Brown the avg GPA is over 3.6 (with 3.66 being A- for most schools). In most cases it isn't that severe, I was implying Harvard, but a half point gap between deflaters and inflaters is common (especially if the deflater is a top public school, which usually keep around a 3.0 median).

What you describe with a ~B- STEM average is common too at the schools not boarding the inflation train
 
Last edited:
Top