- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 0
I think you've misunderstood my point. I meant that the AAMC's goal does not automatically equate to unequal opportunity, because that would stigmatize all minority matriculants based on AAMC data.
AAMC data does not show me to be incorrect. Again, we have to look at choice. And compounding factors. For example, class and race. There was a very lengthy thread rationalizing this, so if you are interested, I would encourage you to find it.
I'm not sure what you are saying. I was simply arguing against you statment about hispanics and access to care, which has been shown many times over to be incorrect. That is the reasoning they use (because they have found it to be accurate), that was my one and only point when using that quote.
Class and race in this country are pretty directly tied to SES in this country (I've posted direct evidence earlier). Obviously class is important but I think people overestimate how much would change if class was considered instead of race (a position I understand, but don't necessarily support)
"It is generally recognized that there are large racial differences in SES, and health researchers routinely adjust for SES when examining the race–health association...Race is an antecedent and determinant of SES, and racial differences in SES reflect, in part, the successful implementation of discriminatory policies premised on the inferiority of certain racial groups."
http://www.echt.chm.msu.edu/blockiii...ioeconomic.pdf