aghast1, where art though

Started by epidural man
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
coprolalia said:
Busy writing a book...

http://www.amazon.com/Anesthesia-Co...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208649130&sr=8-1
Click to expand...

There is only 5 books in store. You better hurry up and grab your copy.


He stopped coming the day he got canned from Larry King. I speculate the producers saw all the crap he wrote here and how immature he was handling issues. No politically correct talking head would post skewed views here, and insult people, in their right mind.

However, I do believe his technique works well for skin procedures where local is used freely.
 
urge said:
However, I do believe his technique works well for skin procedures where local is used freely.
Click to expand...

His technique is basically letting the surgeon do 75% of the anesthetic and him hagging a little bag of propofol then giving 50mg of K 😱 if i can live large from that tell me where to sign
 
urge said:
There is only 5 books in store. You better hurry up and grab your copy.


He stopped coming the day he got canned from Larry King. I speculate the producers saw all the crap he wrote here and how immature he was handling issues. No politically correct talking head would post skewed views here, and insult people, in their right mind.

However, I do believe his technique works well for skin procedures where local is used freely.
Click to expand...
His technique does work and it has it's merits, the problem is:
1- It's not his technique, it's just a form of MAC that we all do.
2- He is presenting it to the lay public as a revolution or a new approach to anesthesia which is misleading to say the least, although there are many examples of people on this very forum who claim that they reinvented anesthesia and that they have their unique way that no one else can understand (not mentioning any names).
 
Planktonmd said:
His technique does work and it has it's merits, the problem is:
1- It's not his technique, it's just a form of MAC that we all do.
2- He is presenting it to the lay public as a revolution or a new approach to anesthesia which is misleading to say the least...
Click to expand...

Hear, hear.

-copro
 
You must log in or register to reply here.