In the interest of time, I don't have time to do both fully. I'm working on Kaplan Bio right now doing the Biological Sciences Section Tests - and I don't really feel challenged enough. I'm not saying that I'm getting perfect scores, but I don't feel that the 'trickiness' of the questions is on the same level as the AAMC's. Maybe the material itself is more challenging, but not the format of the questions. So I'm looking for a more difficult but also effective alternative.
Any suggestions? I have done EK 101 for Bio, and used both Kaplan BIO and EK BIO as content review. I have done all the AAMC's and extensively reviewed them afterwards. I've done some TBR passages, some Kaplan Biological Sciences Tests, and some TPRH passages already but just can't figure out which is more effective. I definitely feel that TBR is more challenging, but not in a way where the questions are integrated in a more difficult manner in correlation to the passage. It is more difficult in the sense that they are too picky with selective details that they ask you to recall as opposed to teaching you really how attack a difficult passage in application to your content review.
I took the test in May, and voided. I didn't really have many 'shoot I don't remember this concept' moments, but I was more so taken aback by the difficult nature of the passages themselves. I did not feel well prepared enough to attack a difficult passage, and this is the kind of practice I'm looking for now.
Thank you!
Any suggestions? I have done EK 101 for Bio, and used both Kaplan BIO and EK BIO as content review. I have done all the AAMC's and extensively reviewed them afterwards. I've done some TBR passages, some Kaplan Biological Sciences Tests, and some TPRH passages already but just can't figure out which is more effective. I definitely feel that TBR is more challenging, but not in a way where the questions are integrated in a more difficult manner in correlation to the passage. It is more difficult in the sense that they are too picky with selective details that they ask you to recall as opposed to teaching you really how attack a difficult passage in application to your content review.
I took the test in May, and voided. I didn't really have many 'shoot I don't remember this concept' moments, but I was more so taken aback by the difficult nature of the passages themselves. I did not feel well prepared enough to attack a difficult passage, and this is the kind of practice I'm looking for now.
Thank you!