- Joined
- Oct 28, 2005
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student
stookie said:How does a DO graduate obtain an allopathic residency? Would they have to take the USMLEs or do programs accept COMLEX scores? Can they pre match or do they have to use a matching service?
You seem to know a lot about this process so I'll ask you my question. The two matches are at seperate times correct? So my question is what if you do EM in both matches. Since I know the results for one comes before the other so if you match in the first one are you obligated or can you wait and see on the other match as well? Hope that is clear. ThanksOSUdoc08 said:How does a DO graduate obtain an allopathic residency? Fill out the application.
Would they have to take the USMLEs or do programs accept COMLEX scores? Most take COMLEX; some require USMLE
Can they pre match or do they have to use a matching service? Sorry---you have to do the match
TSisk23 said:You seem to know a lot about this process so I'll ask you my question. The two matches are at seperate times correct? So my question is what if you do EM in both matches. Since I know the results for one comes before the other so if you match in the first one are you obligated or can you wait and see on the other match as well? Hope that is clear. Thanks
mikeypo0 said:what osudoc is true..sadly it doesnt make any sense coming from a pre-med standpoint
So those that match to allopathic residencies are basically risking not matching in order to try for those positions rather than doing the AOA match?OSUdoc08 said:Allow me to explain:
If you were allowed to match into ACGME residencies first, then noone would go into AOA residencies, and they would be forced to shut down.
An ACGME residency is a year shorter for most areas, since they do not require the internship year.
This is the reason why they won't combine the match. It would be rare for someone to rank an AOA residency at the top of the list, and as a result, the AOA residencies would only get the poorest performing graduates that did not get accepted into ACGME residencies.
TSisk23 said:So those that match to allopathic residencies are basically risking not matching in order to try for those positions rather than doing the AOA match?
Sounds a tad risky unless you get a good vibe from a program. Maybe not I dunno.OSUdoc08 said:Correct.
TSisk23 said:Sounds a tad risky unless you get a good vibe from a program. Maybe not I dunno.
pem8erly said:I think the consensus is that if you don't match into an allopathic residency, you can turn around and try to find an unfilled osteopathic spot. You might be choosing from the leftovers, but at least you'll have something for the year.
OSUdoc08 said:Allow me to explain:
If you were allowed to match into ACGME residencies first, then noone would go into AOA residencies, and they would be forced to shut down.
An ACGME residency is a year shorter for most areas, since they do not require the internship year.
This is the reason why they won't combine the match. It would be rare for someone to rank an AOA residency at the top of the list, and as a result, the AOA residencies would only get the poorest performing graduates that did not get accepted into ACGME residencies.
(nicedream) said:If the AOA would improve their GME, which is impossible since university hospitals are ACGME affiliated, the problem wouldn't exist. However, the AOA does not have much quality GME and so the only chance they have at getting residents is to force students in by having the separate match. It's basically like a gameshow where you can try for a thousand dollars, or just take the hundred.
priu said:In what respects are the AOA GME programs "inferior?" I'm sure there are some quality ones out there, maybe if those quality ones are fewer than in the AGME.
(nicedream) said:Some are supposedly good, but overall they are known as being rather disorganized and half-assed. Also, the vast vast majority are at community hospitals (I believe all except for the AOA IM/FP programs set up at allopathic institutions) . Certainly can't paint all with the same brush, but if they are not inferior, why does the AOA feel the need to keep DOs from flocking to MD programs by maintaining the separate match? They obviously fear the competition.
OSUdoc08 said:Tulsa Regional Medical Center (an AOA hospital):
(nicedream) said:Some are supposedly good, but overall they are known as being rather disorganized and half-assed. Also, the vast vast majority are at community hospitals (I believe all except for the AOA IM/FP programs set up at allopathic institutions). Certainly can't paint all with the same brush, but if they are not inferior, why does the AOA feel the need to keep DOs from flocking to MD programs by maintaining the separate match? They obviously fear the competition.
Thousandth said:Where are you getting your info? There are plenty of dually accredited residencies AOA/ACGME. These are DO residencies and yet they take MD students as well. I guess that would speak poorly of the residencies, the ACGME just accredites anyone who wants a residency right? Anyway, Your arguments are full of holes. There are a large number of ACGME residencies at community hospitals with absolutley no University affiliation. Does this mean that they are all poor quality?
As far as the AOA forcing people into their residencies, they do nothing of the kind. What they are doing is shooting themselves in the foot. As it stands any DO who wants to can apply for ACGME spots. Due to the seperate match and the rule that if a DO (who participates in both matches) matches to DO residency then they are pulled from the ACGME match. This causes all DO's who desire to go to ACGME progams to fore go the DO match entirely. Hence less applicants to DO programs. And just to preemt any disscusion why they do, the overiding reason is LOCATION. There just arent enough DO spots in places where people want to live. Another issue is the lack of a couples match for DO's.
Are there poor DO residencies...Sure. Are there poor MD residencies...Yes.
(nicedream) said:Uh....
The overriding reason for ACGME programs' popularity vs. AOA ones being location? Bull****. You telling me Harvard is popular because it's in Massachusetts? Given the choice between a name-brand univeristy program and East Podunk Hospital, anyone with any ambition will choose the former.
(nicedream) said:Isn't that a university-affiliated community hospital?
(nicedream) said:Uh....
1. When did I say anything about dual accreditation or lack thereof?
2. You obviously don't know what you're talking about because there is no such thing as a "DO residency that takes MDs." The dual-accredited programs (all of which except 5 are in primary care) are MD programs that the AOA has approved for osteopathic board certification.
3. Yes, the allopathic community hospital programs are considered, with some exceptions, to be inferior to the university programs.
Vis-a-vis the AOA forcing people into their programs with the separate match - for one, I was suggesting that was their intention; that should be clear to you. Your statement that "all DOs who desire to go to ACGME programs forego the AOA match completely" could not be further from the truth. If they want primary care, sure - they're almost guaranteed an ACGME spot. If they're going for specialties, it DOES force them to do the AOA match or else take a big risk by skipping it (thus my analagy of the gameshow).
The overriding reason for ACGME programs' popularity vs. AOA ones being location? Bull****. You telling me Harvard is popular because it's in Massachusetts? Given the choice between a name-brand univeristy program and East Podunk Hospital, anyone with any ambition will choose the former.
Thousandth said:You insinuate that the only reason, or at least the major one, that DO's apply to MD residencies is percieved quality/name recognition. This simply isnt true.
Echinoidea said:I beg to differ. I can tell you right now, as a MS2, I do in fact perceive osteopathic GME to be overall less in quality than allopathic. And that, (along with not wanting to do an internship year) will keep me from applying to DO residencies.
Location, (or lack thereof in the Northeast) also is a big factor. When you put all three together, I really, really do not want to do an osteopathic residency.
pink said:I am interviewing at both DO and MD programs for Anesthesia. My plan as of now is to only rank the DO programs that I really like. Then if I don't match, I'll just wait for the MD match. Then, I guess, if I don't match there I will just have to scramble. That's where it gets tricky....Do I scramble for DO internships or MD spots that are unfilled? I'm a little confused at that point......Is anybody else in a similar situation? Osteopathic students really have to develop quite a game plan when it comes to the match(es)!!! 🙂
Arch Guillotti said:Forget the DO programs, ACGME programs are the only way to go in gas.
OSUdoc08 said:Correct.
Thousandth said:As far as dual accreditation goes they have reserved slots specifically for the DO match. Therefore DO residency. And I would like to know where you get your numbers? I know of 3 EM programs off the top of my head that are dual, are you saying that for every other specialty (except primary care) there are only 2 other duals?
Again with the match were are you getting your info? this past year 1500 DO's participated in the MD match..thats almost half of the graduating class. Of those 497 did not match. This means that ALL who participated did not either A) participate in DO match or B) did not match into a DO residency first (Highly unlikley!). Game show yes, forced no. And I did state that it is a bad setup that people are trying to change.
You can find sources that repeatedly state that the number 1 reason for selecting a residency is location. Thats for MD or DO, period. A significant portion of DO residencys are in the midwest. Not every DO student wants to live there, therfore they have to go the ACGME route due to a lack of options.
I wasnt comparing the world renound top name institutions to DO programs. I was comparing residencies across the board. Of course people will want to go to a top name school ( though this doesnt mean that they will be any better of a doctor when they are done, but that is a different issue) but that applies to MD and DO students equally. You insinuate that the only reason, or at least the major one, that DO's apply to MD residencies is percieved quality/name recognition. This simply isnt true.
(nicedream) said:Right, so I was correct in saying that essentially all AOA programs are at community hospitals, other than ones at allopathic institutions.
exlawgrrl said:We know that AOA residencies are generally perceived to be inferior, but it doesn't seem to be hard to get allopathic residencies.
exlawgrrl said:I'm confused about the university vs. community hospital thing, too. I thought TRMC would be a university hospital because it's affiliated with OSUCOM. I thought community residency programs were ones without a university affiliation, or with a weak university affiliation. For example, the hospital I volunteer at has a residency program but is not part of any school, so it's a community program, right? It's urban -- I don't urban vs. rural is the issue. However, I guess that could factor in. OHSU has a program called Cascades East in Klamath Falls, which I think would qualify as a community program.
Anyway, I'm curious.
As for this whole discussion, is there anyone here who feels like they did not or will not get a residency they want because they went to an osteopathic school? We know that AOA residencies are generally perceived to be inferior, but it doesn't seem to be hard to get allopathic residencies. Also, why does it matter if your residency is less prestigious if you don't want to do a fellowship? Will an anesthesiologist with an AOA residency have a notably harder time finding a job than an anesthesiologist with an allopathic residency?
OSUdoc08 said:For the record, all of the AOA residencies are in urban areas.
exlawgrrl said:I'm confused about the university vs. community hospital thing, too. I thought TRMC would be a university hospital because it's affiliated with OSUCOM. I thought community residency programs were ones without a university affiliation, or with a weak university affiliation. For example, the hospital I volunteer at has a residency program but is not part of any school, so it's a community program, right? It's urban -- I don't urban vs. rural is the issue. However, I guess that could factor in. OHSU has a program called Cascades East in Klamath Falls, which I think would qualify as a community program.
Anyway, I'm curious.
As for this whole discussion, is there anyone here who feels like they did not or will not get a residency they want because they went to an osteopathic school? We know that AOA residencies are generally perceived to be inferior, but it doesn't seem to be hard to get allopathic residencies. Also, why does it matter if your residency is less prestigious if you don't want to do a fellowship? Will an anesthesiologist with an AOA residency have a notably harder time finding a job than an anesthesiologist with an allopathic residency?
(nicedream) said:That's certainly not true. I can only speak of the ones in my home-state, but they are extremely suburban.
OSUdoc08 said:Read the entire post. I was referring to those mentioned in said post.
Chief Resident said:Is this perceived inferiority of osteopathic residencies why so many DOs jump ship and opt for allopathic residencies?
DermpathDO said:[
"You obviously don't know what you're talking about because there is no such thing as a "DO residency that takes MDs." The dual-accredited programs (all of which except 5 are in primary care) are MD programs that the AOA has approved for osteopathic board certification."
Hate to shoot you in your obviously biased foot..but there is a dual accredited Pysch residency program at Kennedy Memorial /UMDNJ-SOM in Stratford New Jersey. The program is a D.O. program which sought and recieved ACGME approval and now has at least one slot for an MD Psych resident.