is sending 5 LORs of rec way too much...I know there is a limit of four at aadsas but i have one more that im thinkin about sending to schools separately. wat do u guys think? is four good enough or should i submit that one extra that i have?
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Am i overkilling it?
Started by IWantH2O
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
If you believe all 5 letters are strong and will help you get in, why not?
I personally sent out 4 letters thru AADSAS already, but need to send out another one separately since my package does not meet the requirements at Michigan and USC.
I personally sent out 4 letters thru AADSAS already, but need to send out another one separately since my package does not meet the requirements at Michigan and USC.
is sending 5 LORs of rec way too much...I know there is a limit of four at aadsas but i have one more that im thinkin about sending to schools separately. wat do u guys think? is four good enough or should i submit that one extra that i have?
If 4 are inadequate, it unlikely that a 5th one will be of much help.
If 4 are inadequate, it unlikely that a 5th one will be of much help.
Haha... that is almost a direct quote I heard from the admissions director at Pacific a few years back.
The only reason a 5th would be necessary is to fulfill a specific requirement: Like sending 4 LORs (3 science proffs, 1 dentist) to AADSAS to knock off the handful of schools that require 3 science, and then sending an additional one, like to Nova who requires a non-science proff LOR.
Haha... that is almost a direct quote I heard from the admissions director at Pacific a few years back.
The only reason a 5th would be necessary is to fulfill a specific requirement: Like sending 4 LORs (3 science proffs, 1 dentist) to AADSAS to knock off the handful of schools that require 3 science, and then sending an additional one, like to Nova who requires a non-science proff LOR.
Is this a case of being tuned to the same frequency?
Most schools only ready three so randomly, so make sure you are confident that all of your letters are very favorable. I wouldn't waist your time in sending anymore because five is already more than enough. LOR's are icing on the cake anyway, focus on what really matters - grades and DAT scores!
If 4 are inadequate, it unlikely that a 5th one will be of much help.
very true. and after talking to a few ADCOMs...the more they have the read the less happy they are. short and simple is the best way to get your points across. 3 good LORs will beat 5 so-so LORs.
Don't worry about it. If you feel its important than do it!
I sent 5 as well last yr. and had no problems. Reason was b/c baylor wanted a lor from a dentist. you should be fine. good luck