Amalgam types

Started by booshwa
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

booshwa

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Does anyone know if people still use low-copper amalgams? If so what benefit does it have over a high-copper amalgam?
 
High-Cu amalgams have better corrosion resistance. As a side effect it also gives somewhat better mechanical properties-- Corrosion and pitting causes mechanical weakness. High-Cu amalgams typically last 2-3 times longer than a conventional low-Cu amalgam.

Still have to condense it properly though so you can remove as much of the Gamma-2 mercury phase as possible, which if not removed causes mechanical weakness.

HTH.
 
UBTom said:
Still have to condense it properly though so you can remove as much of the Gamma-2 mercury phase as possible, which if not removed causes mechanical weakness.

I thought that high copper (above 12%?) amalgams do not have the gamma-2 phase but instead have the eta phase (Cu-Sn).

Everything that I've read says that the high copper amalgams have greater strength, with less tarnish and corrosion and less creep. Am I just missing some reason why the low Cu may be used, or is it just an antiquated material?
 
OK, I looked up Sturdevant to refresh my memory on obscure details. 😀

My bad, not just gamma-2, but whatever mercury-rich phase should be removed as much as possible by proper condensation.

Still couldn't find anything in there that says low-Cu amalgams have any advantages over high-Cu amalgams though.