Amu vs g/mol

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Skarl

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Messages
264
Reaction score
266
If 1 mol of a compound contains 96g of mass, why can we not conversely say that 96 amu of that compound contains 1 mol of that compound? This is a UWorld Gen Chem question but with quantities changed and the compound omitted to focus on the general concept and avoid copyright.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hi, Skarl--

1 amu is 1.67 x 10^-24 g. That is the reciprocal of Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23). In other words, 1 amu = 1 / (6.022 x 10^23). Therefore, if 1 mole of a compound has a mass of 96 grams, 1 MOLECULE of that compound has a mass of 96 amu.

It might be easier to think of it as "amu per molecule" and "grams per mole". Of course, you can always calculate grams per molecule by using either conversion factor.

Good luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top