- Joined
- Sep 7, 2001
- Messages
- 1,158
- Reaction score
- 283
There is this one group of GI that do A LOT of biopsies, especially gastric biopsies. I am not a GI-fellowship trained pathologist, but I do read stuff and try to keep abreast of current guidelines, etc. This group tends to ALWAYS do at least four gastric biopsies (body, fundus, antrum, and incisura) on every single patient. I have read their endoscopic notes and there is always a vague mention of "mild diffuse gastritis" no matter what.
In normal practice, I usually got these types of biopsies (in most cases) when the patient was suspected of having an autoimmune process or maybe for mapping IM. If the question is simply to look for HP, why can't this question be asked with maybe two sets of biopsies? I have my deep suspicion as to why it is being done, but I am trying to see if there is actually any reason why it would be important to know if a patchy process like HP infection needs to be teased out by assigning each biopsy as such. I guess they are taking the Sydney guidelines to the Nth degree? It just seems overkill...
In normal practice, I usually got these types of biopsies (in most cases) when the patient was suspected of having an autoimmune process or maybe for mapping IM. If the question is simply to look for HP, why can't this question be asked with maybe two sets of biopsies? I have my deep suspicion as to why it is being done, but I am trying to see if there is actually any reason why it would be important to know if a patchy process like HP infection needs to be teased out by assigning each biopsy as such. I guess they are taking the Sydney guidelines to the Nth degree? It just seems overkill...