Not sure how your course is structured, but for the non-practical exams, I found it very useful to use question books like pretest. It makes it easier to be in the right frame of mind to answer clinical test questions if you've done a lot.
Spend time in the lab. Spend time with as many cadavers as possible. They can only tag one thing on each body, so try to figure out what that "one thing" will be for each body. Know how the tendons lay out on LOTS of bodies. Practice figuring out what things are without touching/manipulating them.
Draw out diagrams of nerves/arteries on paper or whiteboard until you don't need to look at a source diagram. If you study a muscle, use that muscle on your body. Straighten your arm out and try to understand what muscles are pulling what bones. Integrate the information in as many ways as possible.
Think about how you do really well in a math class. You do the problem forwards, and then backwards. Then you find another way to do it.
With all due respect to Mr. Meowmix, I found dissectors and atlases to be the least useful resource, but that's just me. Obviously they are an important piece of the puzzle, but in my school at least, we were not asked to identify pictures - so in my mind they are not that important.
As with any subject in medical school, you need to gear yourself to the test. If its a practical exam, you need to be in there with the bodies. Switch up your study groups so you see the information in different ways and avoid groupthink. Ask someone to show you their body.
If it's a clinical question exam...do step 1 style questions. All of them. Twice. If you don't understand an answer, talk through it with other people until you do.
When dissecting, pay attention to the teachers. Not what they are saying, but what they are doing. Do they always favor 2-3 bodies for showing stuff? Does one teacher spend 30 minutes dissecting one forearm for the students? Good chance that's going to be on the test.
