- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 3,220
- Reaction score
- 671
I think I now know how to get anesthesiologists in a tizzy.
They ignore the economic arguments on what is the best delivery model and instead focus on title.

Jet, as always you just slay me.jetproppilot said:Hey, I like that.
Lets fight fire with fire concerning the MDA thing (yeah, I'm not a big fan of it either), and think like a militant AANA member.
Step one in nursing administration: Have a mandatory/urgent (read:useless) meeting.
Step two: Make sure said-meeting lasts at least 90 minutes in order to justify one's importance/existence, even though info in said meeting could've been emailed in two paragraphs to individuals and read by said individuals in 32 seconds, hence saving everyone from going to a 90 minute meeting.
Step three: Provide sign-in sheet with a paper-width wider than the typical 8 and a half inches of a normal 8.5-by-11" piece of paper, since, of course, nurse administrators are required by law to list every degree achieved past-age-three....for example,
Nancy Nierce, BK, BES, BJHS, HSG, AA, BSN, RN, TPIRFA.
BK= Bachelor of Kindergarten
BES= Bachelor of Elementary School
BJHS= Bachelor of Junior High School
HSG= High School Graduate
AA= Associate of Arts
BSN= Bachelor of Science in Nursing
RN= Registered Nurse
TPIRFA= This Practice Is Really Fuk k ing Annoying
Step Four: Schedule a followup meeting, and a followup meeting to the followup meeting. Have a meeting to determine what time the followup meeting will occur, and meet ten minutes before the followup meeting with "essential teammembers" to ensure the followup meeting addresses salient objectives of the initial, primary meeting.
Now, progress really takes a step forward with
Step Five: At the followup meeting, vote to hire a nurse-administrator-consultant to visit our hospital and make recommendations at a followup meeting to the followup meeting, concerning the utilization of the term MDA.
Ask the consultant at the followup meeting to the followup meeting to spend 2 months reviewing records and interviewing employees at scheduled meetings with said employees about the utilization of the term MDA.
Step Six: Have nurse consultant write an evaluation of the situation. Make sure to make it at least ten pages long, and make sure to not email it to important individuals. Instead, schedule a meeting for presentation of nurse-consultants evaluation.
Step seven: Write a protocol based on nurse consultants evaluation concerning The Verbal Utilization of the term MDA , even though nurse-consultant knows nothing about this specific situation, lives in another state, and has been in "the evaluated" hospital less than three weeks.
mitch8lem said:4 CRNA's to 1 MDA. I don't think so. I live in a rural community of roughly 10,000. The closest MDA is 50 miles away. In other words, not all CRNA's need to work under a Dr. It varies according to state and probably to the hospital census.
Amik25 said:Let me start by saying that I am a student nurse anesthetist and I enjoy reading this board for the clinical discussions (don't know enough yet to contribute). I am not trying to start an argument but I just wanted to address an issue regarding the DNP (doctorate of nursing practice). The statements that are quoted on here are from the AACN, which is the Associate of Colleges of Nursing or something like that and is made up of deans from schools of nursing. They are basically trying to bully all advanced practice nursing programs into requiring the DNP. The AANA does not in any way support this position. They have put out a statement that says they should be able to decide if CRNAs need a doctorate degree, not the AACN. The AANA recognizes the difficulties presented by requiring a DNP, not to mention the political issues involved and are trying to come up with a solution. However, some schools of nursing are already developing these programs and are basically telling the anesthesia programs they have to fall in line because they are in the college of nursing. I know the AANA and ASA have many political differences, but I just wanted to say that the DNP is NOT something the AANA cooked up or even really supports up to this point.
Ami
DrDre' said:Stephen,I think Amik was trying to explain how many NPs AND less political administrators do NOT want to be DNPs. I know many NPs personally and they think all this is stupid. Just becuz someone is a CRNA does not mean you have to bully them immediately.
If I misunderstand either of you, sorry.
stephend7799 said:get lost.. go explain that over at the nursing board.. dont come here because nobody here cares.. If you wanna be captain go to captain school.. There is no substitute, period
Amik25 said:Thank you...that is exactly what I was trying to say. I never once said a single thing in my post about "being the captain," nor did I say anything derogatory about anesthesiologists. I work with CRNAs and anesthesiologists daily and we all have a great relationship. I learn from and work with both providers. I did not post here to start another lame argument...I simply wanted you guys to know that the DNP is really more about the deans of nursing schools pushing their agenda (who do you think makes money from advanced practice nursing education being increased?).
stephend7799 said:listen... I dont care about any deans of any nursing school.. I repeat bring that up in the nursing forum. get lost.. and i dont care if you are a srna crna..or a doctor of nursing.. youare still a friggin nurse.. nomatter what you do.. you need to be put in your place immediately
trinityalumnus said:Unless you go to work on an otherwise-deserted island, you will most probably find yourself working in a hospital setting with other physicians, nurses, pharmacists, housekeepers, office people etc etc.
A big part of a productive, smooth, and enjoyable working environment is getting along with superiors, peers, and subordinates, despite personal opinions and differences in qualifications/job description. The attitude expressed above is a sure-fire way to get "the system" to rapidly become your worst enemy, ultimately making YOU miserable in the process.
With all due respect, the above attitude won't go far in the real world.
stephend7799 said:listen... I dont care about any deans of any nursing school.. I repeat bring that up in the nursing forum. get lost.. and i dont care if you are a srna crna..or a doctor of nursing.. youare still a friggin nurse.. nomatter what you do.. you need to be put in your place immediately
OldManDave said:........ The Admin & Moderation crew have grown weary of seeing our mode of communication tarnished by a few turds...it ends now.
This is a forum for physicians. SRNAs & CRNAs are welcome to participate as long as they do not provoke, harrass or otherwise incite chaos. Physicians, physicians-to-be & physician-want-to-be-s, I expect the same ...... if you are at fault, you will be penalized...........
OldManDave said:I will be very brief & to the point. I am serving notice to all, and I do mean ALL, participants in mudslinging matches here in the anesthesiology forums. While there are many here who wish to legitimately discuss & even debate CRNA/physician anesthesiologist issue, there are a few immature, hot-headed folks who consistently strive to muck it up. This $hit will no longer be tolerated. The Admin & Moderation crew have grown weary of seeing our mode of communication tarnished by a few turds...it ends now.
This is a forum for physicians. SRNAs & CRNAs are welcome to participate as long as they do not provoke, harrass or otherwise incite chaos. Physicians, physicians-to-be & physician-want-to-be-s, I expect the same code of conduct. If you expect to be respected, YOU MUST EARN IT. That means if someone calls you a prick - report it to the moderation crew, deal with it off line or suck it up...DO NOT DEGRADE THESE FORUMS INTO YOUR PERSONAL PLAYGROUND, I AM A BULLY BULL$HIT!
Specifically referring to this thread - the pissing, moaning & bickering stop now. Any more of this arguing crap and I close the thread & go down the list issuing TOS violations. 3x TOSs & your account will be suspended for an indeterminate period...possibly even yielding a lifetime ban tangent upon how big of an @$$ you made of yourself. Single eggregious attacks can go straight to suspension or banning.
The moderation crew has commited itself to cleaning up this forum. Previous SDN policies precluded aggressive intervention. That has changed & we, the moderators, have been given the authority & a mandate to clean this place up & protect/restore the integrity of the forum.
Questions? You are welcome to e-mail me. Let me flatly state, I will not automatically decide in favor of physicians, physicians-to-be & physician-want-to-be-s - if you are at fault, you will be penalized.
OldManDave said:I will be very brief & to the point. I am serving notice to all, and I do mean ALL, participants in mudslinging matches here in the anesthesiology forums. While there are many here who wish to legitimately discuss & even debate CRNA/physician anesthesiologist issue, there are a few immature, hot-headed folks who consistently strive to muck it up. This $hit will no longer be tolerated. The Admin & Moderation crew have grown weary of seeing our mode of communication tarnished by a few turds...it ends now.
This is a forum for physicians. SRNAs & CRNAs are welcome to participate as long as they do not provoke, harrass or otherwise incite chaos. Physicians, physicians-to-be & physician-want-to-be-s, I expect the same code of conduct. If you expect to be respected, YOU MUST EARN IT. That means if someone calls you a prick - report it to the moderation crew, deal with it off line or suck it up...DO NOT DEGRADE THESE FORUMS INTO YOUR PERSONAL PLAYGROUND, I AM A BULLY BULL$HIT!
Specifically referring to this thread - the pissing, moaning & bickering stop now. Any more of this arguing crap and I close the thread & go down the list issuing TOS violations. 3x TOSs & your account will be suspended for an indeterminate period...possibly even yielding a lifetime ban tangent upon how big of an @$$ you made of yourself. Single eggregious attacks can go straight to suspension or banning.
The moderation crew has commited itself to cleaning up this forum. Previous SDN policies precluded aggressive intervention. That has changed & we, the moderators, have been given the authority & a mandate to clean this place up & protect/restore the integrity of the forum.
Questions? You are welcome to e-mail me. Let me flatly state, I will not automatically decide in favor of physicians, physicians-to-be & physician-want-to-be-s - if you are at fault, you will be penalized.
BIS said:Half the people here seem to be blowing smoke up their a$$ when they start trash talking. I seriously hope that posters dont act the way they do here in real life. In reality you have consequences, administrations, deans, dept heads to deal with. Here the crap can fly and anyone can pop off.
Best thing to remember is to not take anything personal.
sevoflurane said:where the real confusion is going to come is with the "Doctor of Nursing Practice" (DNP) degree. has everyone heard of this travesty yet? that's something to talk about...
UTSouthwestern said:Trying to be a doctor without having to go through medical school. That's what it all boils down to. Confuse the public and hope no one notices the difference.
UTSouthwestern said:What it boils down to is an attempt to get a piece of that pie by expanding scopes of practice without having to train extensively, then adding a pseudo-doctoral title upon completion of training to disguise the differences. It's bypassing medical school to call yourself a doctor.
When these pseudo-doctors emerge, how many will have Dr. John Smith, Family Medicine on their white coats? How will the public know who is a physician and who is a nurse? It's a farce and attempt to bypass comprehensive training to practice MEDICINE (not nursing). Diagnosing and making therapeutic decisions on whatever scale they want to try to expand into.
Sugar72 said:Every time I see MDA, I laugh at what my abbreviation will be as a DO.
stephend7799 said:listen... I dont care about any deans of any nursing school.. I repeat bring that up in the nursing forum. get lost.. and i dont care if you are a srna crna..or a doctor of nursing.. youare still a friggin nurse.. nomatter what you do.. you need to be put in your place immediately
lax said:MDs do not come to the bedside until after 6 years of education. So that leaves 2 years of medical school and residency that might only amount to 1 year.
lax said:In both careers, the students are bright. Their title will read, Dr. John Smith, DNP vs Dr. John Smith, MD. Don't forget that the medical doctor is not the only profession that is called Dr.
lax said:First off, the amount of time it will take to be a DNP will be 8 + years. Why would one want to bypass medical school? IT is the the same length of time. There will be extensive training. Also, let's not forget that nurses work at the bedside their entire education (in this case, will be 8 years). MDs do not come to the bedside until after 6 years of education. So that leaves 2 years of medical school and residency that might only amount to 1 year. Get over it. In both careers, the students are bright. Their title will read, Dr. John Smith, DNP vs Dr. John Smith, MD. Don't forget that the medical doctor is not the only profession that is called Dr.
lax said:This is complete ignorance......There is no reason for her to be put in her place. As a matter of fact, the DNP is a good idea. The reason that it is a good idea is that it requires nurses to be better educated....it requires a doctoral degree not a masters to provide advanced nursing care. So you think doctor of Pharmacology (ie PharmD) is stupid? Just because it has doctor in the title doesn't mean it equals MD. So Lame!
here here...it's called allnurses.com.burntcrispy said:....
As far as nurses coming over here and starting or fueling arguments, please take it to a nursing forum somewhere else. This sight is called studentDOCTOR.
Thank you.