- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
So, I realize that multiple people have posted over the last year fearing that they failed Step II CS. It seems like the majority of them ended up doing just fine. I felt pretty good about the test right after finishing it, but am now panicking that I may have really messed up.
Some things I'm really concerned about:
- I was pretty confident that most of my differential diagnoses were well within reason, but I would say that I only listed 1-2 supporting details from the history on ~ 70% of my differential diagnoses. I didn't list supporting details on the rest of my diagnoses. I either didn't have enough time, or just thought that there wasn't much more detail I could include.
- Looking back at my cases, I'm pretty confident in most of work-up orders. Reviewing first aid got me geared towards ordering more follow-up studies than I would have originally been comfortable doing. I have now learned that they dock for "extraneous" tests
- Physical exam - I only listened to 4 places on the lung exam (but inspected, percussed and evaluated for fremitus when indicated); I rushed my abdominal exam and didn't spend "3 seconds" palpating or auscultating
- I ran out of time and couldn't list Social History, Allergies and Meds in one case
- May have accidentally documented a couple things I didn't ask about
Things I did well
- Alway knocked, shook hands, said patient's name, started with open ended questions, washed hands, summarized, expressed empathy, counseled when appropriate, debriefed patients
- HPIs were accurate and thorough
- Always asked about PMH, PSH, Social, Meds, Allergies, OB/GYN, Family history, Growth/Development and documented appropriately
- Did heart/lungs on every patient with additional physical exam components as needed
- Physical exam was documented well
- Was confident with most of my differential diagnoses
- Ordered appropriate tests (and a couple I maybe shouldn't have)
Mainly, I'm worried about me not having enough "supporting details" for my differential. Looking back, I probably should have included more. Anyone else have a similar experience and is willing to share their result?
Some things I'm really concerned about:
- I was pretty confident that most of my differential diagnoses were well within reason, but I would say that I only listed 1-2 supporting details from the history on ~ 70% of my differential diagnoses. I didn't list supporting details on the rest of my diagnoses. I either didn't have enough time, or just thought that there wasn't much more detail I could include.
- Looking back at my cases, I'm pretty confident in most of work-up orders. Reviewing first aid got me geared towards ordering more follow-up studies than I would have originally been comfortable doing. I have now learned that they dock for "extraneous" tests
- Physical exam - I only listened to 4 places on the lung exam (but inspected, percussed and evaluated for fremitus when indicated); I rushed my abdominal exam and didn't spend "3 seconds" palpating or auscultating
- I ran out of time and couldn't list Social History, Allergies and Meds in one case
- May have accidentally documented a couple things I didn't ask about
Things I did well
- Alway knocked, shook hands, said patient's name, started with open ended questions, washed hands, summarized, expressed empathy, counseled when appropriate, debriefed patients
- HPIs were accurate and thorough
- Always asked about PMH, PSH, Social, Meds, Allergies, OB/GYN, Family history, Growth/Development and documented appropriately
- Did heart/lungs on every patient with additional physical exam components as needed
- Physical exam was documented well
- Was confident with most of my differential diagnoses
- Ordered appropriate tests (and a couple I maybe shouldn't have)
Mainly, I'm worried about me not having enough "supporting details" for my differential. Looking back, I probably should have included more. Anyone else have a similar experience and is willing to share their result?