- Joined
- Sep 7, 2003
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 0
With all of the "versus" threads, I thought I would post my own - but with a twist. I would appreciate it if everyone would throw in their $.02.
First, some background. I'm 23, have a bachelor's degree in business, and applied to M.D. and D.O. schools for the first time last year. My GPA is a 3.0, and my MCAT is a 26. I graduated from college in 2.5 years, at age 20, and then decided to pursue medicine. So I went back and took the pre-med courses and had about a 3.2 in those. I have worked full-time for almost two years now. I have good EC's (shadowed a primary care physician on rounds, scrubbed in on some surgeries, volunteered at a free medical clinic, helped at a soup kitchen, etc.). I feel confident that my recommendation letters are all very good.
I applied to 14 schools last fall, and was accepted at a D.O. school (Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine). I'm currently on the waiting list at my top choice, an M.D. school, the University of South Carolina. They told me that I'm at the top of the bottom third of their ranked waiting list, which puts me around #40. I could still get in there, but with a class size of about 80, I'm making backup plans in case I don't get in.
I don't have a problem with the D.O. philosophy at all, and I have utmost respect for VCOM and what they are doing there (I am very thankful that I somehow got in, because the average numbers there are 3.4/26 and I know a bunch of people with better numbers than I who didn't even get a secondary application from them). However, I do have some concerns about VCOM. Namely, it is a young school and will not technically be accredited until the first class graduates (which will be in 2007). I have no idea how the program will be perceived by residency directors. I have a problem knowing that some residency programs are "off limits" to D.O. students, and other programs require a D.O. to have better grades and test scores than M.D. students to be considered their equals. Unfortunately, there is still somewhat of a D.O. stigma that exists (which I disagree with). The school is focused on rural medicine, and I have no interest in practicing in rural America when I am finished with residency. The biggest problem I have with VCOM (and any D.O. school for that matter) is the cost. It is going to end up costing me $70,000 or so more to attend VCOM than it would USC. That's a lot of money, especially since I am leaning toward a primary care field.
My "versus" deals with the following: do I take the sure thing and attend VCOM, feeling confident that I will get a great education, have access to top notch facilities, and meet some great people, or do I try to get in the Special Master's Program at Georgetown and reapply for matriculation in fall 2005? The idea of spending a year in D.C. sounds fun, and although it's $30,000 or so for the year, I think it would be a neat experience and prepare me well for the rigors of medical school. The risk, of course, is that I would not get in anywhere next year and then possibly regret not taking the sure thing at VCOM. Some people say that it doesn't really matter where you get your degree, and that the important thing is to get in somewhere. When I'm practicing medicine in 8 years, it might not matter at all as long as I'm licensed to practice in the U.S.
If I decided to pursue the M.S. from Georgetown, I would plan on taking the August MCAT this year, do well in the program, and hopefully get in at an M.D. school. With my poor GPA, I know that it would probably take at least a 30 or so on the MCAT and a good performance in Georgetown SMP to do that.
Opinions and thoughts are appreciated. Thanks in advance!
First, some background. I'm 23, have a bachelor's degree in business, and applied to M.D. and D.O. schools for the first time last year. My GPA is a 3.0, and my MCAT is a 26. I graduated from college in 2.5 years, at age 20, and then decided to pursue medicine. So I went back and took the pre-med courses and had about a 3.2 in those. I have worked full-time for almost two years now. I have good EC's (shadowed a primary care physician on rounds, scrubbed in on some surgeries, volunteered at a free medical clinic, helped at a soup kitchen, etc.). I feel confident that my recommendation letters are all very good.
I applied to 14 schools last fall, and was accepted at a D.O. school (Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine). I'm currently on the waiting list at my top choice, an M.D. school, the University of South Carolina. They told me that I'm at the top of the bottom third of their ranked waiting list, which puts me around #40. I could still get in there, but with a class size of about 80, I'm making backup plans in case I don't get in.
I don't have a problem with the D.O. philosophy at all, and I have utmost respect for VCOM and what they are doing there (I am very thankful that I somehow got in, because the average numbers there are 3.4/26 and I know a bunch of people with better numbers than I who didn't even get a secondary application from them). However, I do have some concerns about VCOM. Namely, it is a young school and will not technically be accredited until the first class graduates (which will be in 2007). I have no idea how the program will be perceived by residency directors. I have a problem knowing that some residency programs are "off limits" to D.O. students, and other programs require a D.O. to have better grades and test scores than M.D. students to be considered their equals. Unfortunately, there is still somewhat of a D.O. stigma that exists (which I disagree with). The school is focused on rural medicine, and I have no interest in practicing in rural America when I am finished with residency. The biggest problem I have with VCOM (and any D.O. school for that matter) is the cost. It is going to end up costing me $70,000 or so more to attend VCOM than it would USC. That's a lot of money, especially since I am leaning toward a primary care field.
My "versus" deals with the following: do I take the sure thing and attend VCOM, feeling confident that I will get a great education, have access to top notch facilities, and meet some great people, or do I try to get in the Special Master's Program at Georgetown and reapply for matriculation in fall 2005? The idea of spending a year in D.C. sounds fun, and although it's $30,000 or so for the year, I think it would be a neat experience and prepare me well for the rigors of medical school. The risk, of course, is that I would not get in anywhere next year and then possibly regret not taking the sure thing at VCOM. Some people say that it doesn't really matter where you get your degree, and that the important thing is to get in somewhere. When I'm practicing medicine in 8 years, it might not matter at all as long as I'm licensed to practice in the U.S.
If I decided to pursue the M.S. from Georgetown, I would plan on taking the August MCAT this year, do well in the program, and hopefully get in at an M.D. school. With my poor GPA, I know that it would probably take at least a 30 or so on the MCAT and a good performance in Georgetown SMP to do that.
Opinions and thoughts are appreciated. Thanks in advance!