There was a similar thread on this topic, but it didn't hit on what I'm getting at. What made you choose to pursue EM over trauma surgery? Did any of you do an EM residency and years later regret not doing the surgical one? Is there enough exciting airway/resuscitation/vascular stuff attached to EM that feeds your adrenaline-seeking personality? The diagnostic core of EM is appealing to me and I lean towards being a physician over a surgeon, but I wonder if any of you had a similar perspective that got flipped as your career progressed.
They are actually pretty different so what is it that you're getting at that wasn't addressed in threads previously? When people talk about the adrenaline aspect, that is usually a function of how decisions need to be made
right now. The need to make important decisions immediately is EM and is the "exciting" aspect that most people are alluding to.
Airway at most community places is either EM or anesthesia so if you want that, don't work at a shop where EM isn't involved in the airway. The only time surgery usually gets involved is for surgical airways, but if you're an EP, you do those, too.
Resuscitation is a broad concept and if the surgical resolution is what interests you, you won't get that in EM. Likewise, if the final solution is catherization, neurosurg, etc, you won't get those in EM, either.
What I like about EM is the timing - we are involved in the critical, time-sensitive aspects of the any specialty's emergency. Honestly, I couldn't care less how hard/easy/interesting the repair of a arterial lac/GI bleed/occluded coronary is. Those parts seem boring to me so I don't feel any FOMO there.
Specialists manage patients longitudinally in their respective fields. If the thought of rounding on the same "exciting" GSW for the next who-knows-how-long and then seeing them in clinic months after that doesn't make you die inside, maybe you should look into other fields more closely.