Originally posted by aphistis
Two objections to this line of thought:
1) The public either "can't make heads or tails of either degree," or "perceives that the 'MD' of the DMD connotates more weight than the DDS degree." You can't have them both; they're mutually exclusive.
1) How so? I actually think they can be mutually INCLUSIVE.
The public is completely confused as to why there are two dental degrees. It doesn't make sense to them. We tell them they are equivalent, and they wonder why we don't all get the same degree. This troubles them.
To the public, however, the DMD sounds like more advanced training (despite the fact that they don't understand WHY two degrees are awarded).
So, the public doesn't understand the awarding of the degrees, but one sounds better to them than the other one.
2) As far as my thinking one is better than the other, I do think the DMD does a much better job of recognizing our actual job descriptions. I won't always be using surgery to treat each patient I see.
Your thought that I'm interested on capitalizing on public ignorance is ignorant in and of itself. Remember, our degree just changed last month. I certainly didn't enroll in a school based on the degree it awards. As I said before, I feel the DMD is a much more accurate description of our profession. Regardless, I'm doubting my patients will know much about either degree, nor many of them care when seeking/receiving treatment. My chairside manner will woo them regardless of the titles I own
BTW, Bill, I probably didn't convey my thoughts very well in my original post. Thanks for making turning me towards a more critical assesment.