D
deleted74029
I've seen alot of threads on here here ppl studied really long hours and just about all of them made at least a 30. Anyone on here put in major hours and not make a 30?
I've seen alot of threads on here here ppl studied really long hours and just about all of them made at least a 30. Anyone on here put in major hours and not make a 30?
I've seen alot of threads on here here ppl studied really long hours and just about all of them made at least a 30. Anyone on here put in major hours and not make a 30?
^^SDN is a great resource, but can at times give a skewed view of reality.
25Isn't the average MCAT (of all test takers) around 26? Someone correct me if this is wrong, but I know it is definately in the 20s. So ALOT ALOT ALOT of people study their butts off and don't break 30. SDN gives a skewed perception, but the vast majority of people that take the test don't break 30.
Also...most people that make, say a 22, aren't going to be bragging about the long hours they put in and still ended up getting their butt kicked...
Isn't the average MCAT (of all test takers) around 26? Someone correct me if this is wrong, but I know it is definately in the 20s. So ALOT ALOT ALOT of people study their butts off and don't break 30. SDN gives a skewed perception, but the vast majority of people that take the test don't break 30.
Also...most people that make, say a 22, aren't going to be bragging about the long hours they put in and still ended up getting their butt kicked...
Ask me in a month. Although I did just get a 32 on my third practice after my excellent scores of 25 and 26
I seriously studied 18 hours a day for 1 month and a half. No joke. Started getting 32-35's on practice exams of the real previous MCAT's. Unfortunately, I only got a 29 on the real Jan. MCAT. I was very sad.....
Oh well, I don't plan on taking it again and I hope I get into a med school this year. Gees~
My experience with standardized testing is almost exclusively limited to the SAT, which I'm well aware is not much like the MCAT at all. However, I think it would be safe to say this: there is a huge difference between simply studying "a lot", and studying HARD. If I had practiced for the SAT by simply repeating tests and not paying any attention to what I got wrong, why I got it wrong, or how I could have improved my technique, amount of studying would have been irrelevant. If you actually study rigorously, I don't personally see how you could not succeed.
It seemed to work in my case. Those were exactly my scores.I got a 1550 on my SAT by the way, so don't think that your SAT skills will guarantee you a 35 on your MCAT.
Same thing happened to me. Well, the practice test part, not the 18hrs/day part. I got in. 29 is fine, as long as you have a good GPA and extracurriculars.
You're right about one thing. SAT is nothing like the MCAT. You'll see. You can study rigorously, and not do well on the MCAT. I got a 1550 on my SAT by the way, so don't think that your SAT skills will guarantee you a 35 on your MCAT.
yea, for example theres no math section on the MCAT haha.
but seriously, how did you do on the subject tests?