Anyone use Rapid Review Anatomy?

[Ravendown]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Like the topic states...I just got this books to help me review for anatomy. It seems pretty good at the moment, but i just want to know if anyone else used it and found it to be good.Thanks for any input.

 

[MagicalTrevor]

I've used both BRS and RR anatomy and looked through HY as well and I can honestly say that while both come in handy BRS is the better of the two. That being said. I used both for different things. BRS I used for learning the material as I found that RR leaves some stuff out that are necessary to understanding the anatomy well, also the conclusion summaries at the end of chapters are worth their weight in gold. RR is great for the clinical components though. There are many clinical boxes in RR (more than BRS) which make them very good to look through. In the end my studying was read BRS and learn everything in BRS. Read through all of RR anatomy as a review paying close attention to the clinical boxes. They both emphasize different things and the extra practice is great.

 

[Ravendown]

Thanks, i wasn't sure whether the book would be a suitable guide while i was studying in the course. I'll probably borrow Brs from someone who had it before and see if it works for me. My experience with BRS previously is that it has errors here and there, which i may or may not be able to pick up, most notably with the biochemistry book. I'll definitely check this out though, thanks for your input.