Applying to Clinical Psychology Program after graduating from law school

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Born2rumble1st

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
114
Reaction score
4
So, I graduated from law school in May and am now in the process of applying to Ph.D. programs in clinical psychology. However, I am having difficulty in crafting my personal statement. I don't know whether to focus on the fact I went to law school, and explaining my reasons for now wanting to enter a Ph.D. program, or focus just on why I want to do a Ph.D. and not make the focus of the essay on the transition from law to psych. I am applying to programs that specialize in forensic psychology, so the fact I went to law school shouldn't be quite so shocking to the schools. Also, if I do focus on law school in my personal statement, should I own it (I meant to go to law school, it was part of the plan, etc.) or play it off as a mistake (Once I got to law school, I realized it wasn't what I thought it would be, better suited for psych, etc.). There's pros and cons for each approach, but I'm struggling with deciding which way to go. Any advice would be most appreciated! Thanks.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I would be mention it one way or the other (whichever is the truth) but I would not spend much time on it at all (two sentences or so). Unless an experience you had during law school directly influenced/insipired your desire to pursue a career in forensic clinical psychology, I dont really see how its relevant-Or at least not something I would write in the personal statement, where each of the 500 words is precious and should be absolutely necessary. The vast, vast majority of the personal statement should be spent talking about psychology, your research experience in psychology or other sciences, as well as your current research interests and how they fit with a professor at that program.
 
I think you can highlight your law background as a potential benefit to the psychology community: you better understand the laws that psychologists must practice within; you might pursue forensics or even child custody evaluations- you'd make a killer expert witness; you may wish to go to APA governance and lobby for the rights of psychologists and their patients.

You might also add something about not quitting something you've started, and only realized you didn't want to be a lawyer after you were already mid-law school.

Law school will help you stand out from your competition. Your ability to cogently construct a logical argument will be a benefit to you in your scholarly writing.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
While all those things may be true, the reality is that the personal statement simply doesn't leave room for all this, as there are many other things critical to the admissions process that need to be highlighted in the PS (e.g.,experience in psychology and psychology research, clinical experience inspiratios and research match and interests). Admissions committees are simply making decisions about 1.) Are you a good research fit with someone there? 2) can you be successful in the program and be productive within it? Admission to one high degree program doesn't necessarily speak to your potential for success in another either. And, they are probably not gonna care that you might be an expert witness someday, that you may become a high ranking APA member someday, or that you understand law better. They will teach you about ethics and scope of practice issues in the program, thats why they are there. All these are advantages once you are in, but not necessarily for getting in.

I think you can use the angle and your former career/degree to your advantage, but you are gonna have to work it towards the things an admissions committee is going to value.
 
Last edited:
Psychmama, where are you??

Okay, so here are my thoughts as someone who switched from law to psych after many years of law practice (which is a bit different than your situation, obviously).

1) Do you have a strong background in psychology from undergrad? Obviously, if this is the case you'll have much more to say about research interests, clinical experiences, and the like. I did not have this, so I had to construct a story for myself about how I arrived at applying to clinical psych programs from a background as a lawyer. Not surprisingly, this approach worked best for me at programs that were practice-heavy, especially PsyD programs. Your situation may be different if you have a strong research background and/or well-developed research interests.

2) In any case, I'd definitely own your law training -- not as a mistake but as a part of your evolution as someone who's passionate about clinical psychology. Do this in whatever way works for you -- maybe it was what got you jazzed about forensic work, maybe it was the rigorous analytical training of law school, interest in policy-making and health care -- whatever, just think about how you ended up where you are and spin it to your advantage. Having a law degree is not a substitute for the prereqs to a psych program, but it is definitely an advantage because it shows you can do academic work at a very high level, that you know how to think on your feet and express yourself well, and that you can cope with stress.

3) Think about your goals in psychology and make sure you can relate them to what you've already done. Are you research-minded? Then make sure you have enough research experience from undergrad to make you competitive with other applicants. If not, take a year off and try to do some research. Are you more focused on practice? This should be easier to sell as related to your law degree -- assuming you've had clinical experiences inside and outside of law school that relate in some way to your burgeoning interest in psychology. If you feel at a loss to make these connections (in your personal statement or in an interview), perhaps think about taking a year to refine your clinical interests and make sure clinical psych is for you.

These are just some general ideas. Obviously, I don't know how applicable they may be to you. In any case, I'd try to strike a balance in terms of how much to emphasize your law degree -- do not make it the focal point of your statement (after all, the focus should be on why you want psychology) but do not ignore it either. Admissions committees will see you went to law school and naturally want to know why you now want to be a psychologist. There's just no way to not address that. Turn it into a strength in whatever way you can. :luck:
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much for your input, everyone! I'm actually kind of unique in that I planned on getting a J.D. and Ph.D. from the very start of my educational career. I firmly believed that a J.D. would enable me to truly understand the difficulties my target population (juvenile delinquents) was going through. And I did get great experience through my law school's juvenile justice clinical program. However, every time I mention that to someone, they say I'm crazy for going to law school in order to learn how to think like a lawyer and to gain that experience as a juvenile defense attorney. Which, I admit, it may not be the first thing people think of when they consider going to law school. Due to that reaction, I've been very unsure about how to frame my decision to go to law school. Your advice has definitely helped me gain a little perspective on that.

Luckily, I do have B.A.'s in Psychology and Criminology, so it's clear that this isn't a random switch. I do have psychology research experience, which I gained as an undergrad, and I worked as a legal research assistant all throughout my time in law school. Not the same thing, but it was what was available. I guess my main concern with my law school history is that I did several things in law school for the experience, and not so much because I was interested in it. So, for example, I've published three articles on various legal topics (white collar crime and sexual offenders primarily), which looks good in terms of, "Oh published!" but also makes me look like I don't know what I'm interested in. I also have an undergraduate publication that is more in line with my research interests, but when you put it next to the other three, it's like I'm two different people. Sigh.

But enough about me. 🙂 Thank you all for your help and I'll do my best to try and convince the admissions committee that I'm not completely crazy for going to law school and now attempting to get into a Ph.D. program. I think I'm going to go with my original idea for the opening of my personal statement (a vignette demonstrating why I'm interested in juvenile delinquency) as opposed to directly addressing law school at the beginning as some of my friends were telling me to do.
 
For what it's worth, I like the idea of opening with the delinquency vignette, as I think this provides the umbrella for organizing why you've chosen the path you have. I say don't worry too much about justifying why you went to law school first -- some may question your choice but others will be duly impressed and assume you're just super passionate about your forensic interests. Good luck with it!👍
 
There are a few I know of that have taken this path and they have done much good for society. One example is Dr. Behnke. He's currently the director of the Ethics office at APA. I believe he received a law degree from Yale and then went to on get his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan.
 
There's a lawyer turned school psychologist in my program as well. She teaches the ethics class (among others) and she always has some pretty great advice about the things you have to worry about getting sued for as a psychologist as well as the things you can do to protect against this.
 
Top