- Joined
- Jun 16, 2011
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
This being my first post here, I want to say that this board has been a phenomenal resource during the AMCAS application process. I'm a Canadian student and relatively unfamiliar with the application process in the States, so no doubt a lot of the insight I've found here has been helpful in allowing me to decide which schools to apply to and how to give myself the best chances in my application.
That said, I haven't been able to find a direct answer to what is my biggest concern about applying to the US. Unlike Canadian schools, American schools have pretty stringent undergraduate course requirements. As a first-year undergrad, I was relatively free to branch out from the Sciences in the courses I took, so I ended up doing politics in first year instead of the general physics course. I completed my B.Sc. in Psychology/Biology and am now doing a M.Sc. in Neuroscience. I have the pre-reqs in Bio, Chem, Orgo and Calc, but never ended up taking Physics.
My question is: are there any special circumstances under which MD admissions committees disregard this requirement? My decision not to take Physics had nothing to do with not being able to do well but was just a lack of planning. In fact, the strength of my application is definitely my academic record and research experience. My GPA and MCAT should be in the upper range of any school I apply to, and I obviously have a good enough understanding of science to be able to handle general physics (again, I showed this by doing very well on my MCAT). I am also wondering whether it would help to call individual schools and explain my situation before I submit my application, to see if they will consider me.
I thought I might add that I'm only interested in applying to top tier and research intensive US schools (e.g. Stanford, Columbia, John Hopkins, etc.) and maybe some schools will be more or less lenient than others. Taking undergrad Physics now really isn't an option either.
I also apologize if there is a similar post elsewhere. I searched for a while, but didn't find what I was looking for.
Thanks in advance!
That said, I haven't been able to find a direct answer to what is my biggest concern about applying to the US. Unlike Canadian schools, American schools have pretty stringent undergraduate course requirements. As a first-year undergrad, I was relatively free to branch out from the Sciences in the courses I took, so I ended up doing politics in first year instead of the general physics course. I completed my B.Sc. in Psychology/Biology and am now doing a M.Sc. in Neuroscience. I have the pre-reqs in Bio, Chem, Orgo and Calc, but never ended up taking Physics.
My question is: are there any special circumstances under which MD admissions committees disregard this requirement? My decision not to take Physics had nothing to do with not being able to do well but was just a lack of planning. In fact, the strength of my application is definitely my academic record and research experience. My GPA and MCAT should be in the upper range of any school I apply to, and I obviously have a good enough understanding of science to be able to handle general physics (again, I showed this by doing very well on my MCAT). I am also wondering whether it would help to call individual schools and explain my situation before I submit my application, to see if they will consider me.
I thought I might add that I'm only interested in applying to top tier and research intensive US schools (e.g. Stanford, Columbia, John Hopkins, etc.) and maybe some schools will be more or less lenient than others. Taking undergrad Physics now really isn't an option either.
I also apologize if there is a similar post elsewhere. I searched for a while, but didn't find what I was looking for.
Thanks in advance!