L
LoveBeingHuman:)
Particularly for mid-tier MD schools that operate on a rolling admissions basis.
3 days to 3 months, it varies widely
On average...
3 days + 90 days = 93 days divided by 2 = 46.5 days
An average isn't simply the mean of the high and low end of a set of data
I suggest you re-take statistics
An average isn't simply the mean of the high and low end of a set of data
I suggest you re-take statistics
I think he just meant it as a joke...you're being too serious here.
I think he just meant it as a joke...you're being too serious here.
Lets all just be glad we're humans 🙂
Agreed 🙂
P.S. Pun intended? Lol
The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle clearly states that since we know the location of the medical school in space, we cannot determine the velocity with which they reach final decisions. Gen Chem 101 here people...
You MFing win
Oh stop beating a dead cat or not dead cat......
BTW, Trump University Medical School and Casino Resort is still interviewing top candidates with high (credit) scores. Its gonna be YUGE!
Why so serious?An average isn't simply the mean of the high and low end of a set of data
I suggest you re-take statistics
The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle clearly states that since we know the location of the medical school in space, we cannot determine the velocity with which they reach final decisions. Gen Chem 101 here people...
The principle is actually all candidates are in a state of accepted or rejected until they open their inbox.The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle clearly states that since we know the location of the medical school in space, we cannot determine the velocity with which they reach final decisions. Gen Chem 101 here people...
Chill out schrodinger.The principle is actually all candidates are in a state of accepted or rejected until they open their inbox.
Three fifty .Particularly for mid-tier MD schools that operate on a rolling admissions basis.
About.did you just say.......
tree fiddey?
Who should it be attributed to ? David Hume?"Predictions are difficult, especially about the future" widely (and incorrectly) attributed to Neils Bohr
The reason I mentioned hume was because he makes an argument along the lines of the past cannot be used to predict the future:The Danish politician Karl Kristian Steincke
http://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/20/no-predict/
The reason I mentioned hume was because he makes an argument along the lines of the past cannot be used to predict the future:
"“As to past experience, it can be allowed to give direct and certain information of those precise objects only, and that precise period of time, which fell under its cognizance: but why this experience should be extended to future times, and to other objects ...this is the main question on which I would insist. The bread, which I formerly eat, nourished me; that is, a body of such sensible qualities was, at that time, endued with such secret powers: but does it follow, that other bread must also nourish me at another time, and that like sensible qualities must always be attended with like secret powers? The consequence seems no wise necessary.”"
David Hume is perhaps one of the founders of scientific thought or method. while he believed and wrote much on the psychology of human behavior being from passion rather than rational thought, he was an empiricist always noting that human knowledge only comes from experience and observation.
In other words, virtually every part of science you have learned in college has been influenced by him.
you would have to be an idiot or ignorant on having gone thru college without knowing that
The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle clearly states that since we know the location of the medical school in space, we cannot determine the velocity with which they reach final decisions. Gen Chem 101 here people...
Indeed. I taught this in my high school chemistry class as well.