I was just curious if one of the reasons why med school admissions interviewers consider attractiveness as a plus is because patients are more likely to listen to the advice of attractive physicians. If my doctor was fat and ugly, I would think he/she is not taking care of him/herself well so I would be less likely to listen to his/her advice on how to take care of myself. Would you agree?
Okay, I'll bite. Psychological studies have shown that attractive people get better responses from everyone, including babies, who have no intellectual or pre-conceived notions of beauty, but actually respond better to people with "symmetrical faces." Attractive people often have a slight advantage (according to "studies") in job interviews.
I'm not sure how true any of this really is. I know that I judge people based upon how they speak, and how they express themselves. I tend to favor people who are eloquent and articulate, and have friendly faces.
If I had to respond to how I perceive the correlation of attractiveness with ability, it's not a clear-cut response. When I meet an attractive physician (male or female) I think I am harder on them than I would be towards an average physician. I assume their looks and charm played at least SOME role in their success, so I'm quicker to doubt their expertise if they don't articulate their ideas smoothly. It's not intentional or fair, but I'm being honest. There is a degree to which it works in the opposite manner--I think I implicitly trust anyone (male or female) who is good-looking, well-groomed, and somehow more elegant than the average lot.
The flip-side is that as a patient, I feel safe with a practitioner who is almost uncomfortably well-spoken. The physician who has not paid special attention to their clothing but explains their understanding of my condition definitely has an advantage over their well-groomed counterpart, who doesn't bother explaining what they really think, but gives me a diagnosis or treatment.
I assumed in writing this that I'd find that I was really biased one way or another. In retrospect, I've always trusted the physician who seems to be speaking to me, not about me, and who takes five minutes to talk to me.
I actually started this post thinking I would explain how the "fit" doctor would have more of an impact on me than one who is out of shape. But my own family practitioner, who just recently retired at well over the age of 75, still talked about his annual multi-week camping trips on the Colorado River. The young practitioner he brought in is probably no more than 40 now. He was chubby, out-of-shape, and more interested in spending his free time on the couch than camping in the Rockies. I respected him as much as my retiring GP. He was not rugged, and had less practice in medicine, but he diagnosed my carpal tunnel and taught me how to splint my wrist at night so that I'd never lose function in my wrist. He caught my mother's mitral valve prolapse when she was 45, and nobody had noticed it before.
The fact is, it doesn't really matter how you look. In the end, even in the most superficial realms, people really want answers. They want doctors who will see who they are and address their medical statuses within the context of how they live. You may doubt the 300-pound endocrinologist who tells you to exercise and eat better, but in the end, it's all about who really listens to you, and gives you the best advice.
At one point (years ago) I thought of becoming a nutritionist. I was obsessed with eating right, and abolished all empty carbs and fatty meats from my diet. It was easy for me, because I didn't really LIKE white bread, dairy products, or T-bone steaks. I have always lived on whole grains, skim milk, and grilled chicken. I knew I'd be a terrible nutritionist because I didn't even understand why people loved junk food. I could never imagine why people wouldn't prefer vegetarian or turkey chili over the meaty version, or why it would be problematic to replace butter with PAM spray.
In order to relate to people, you need to be able to understand them. Sure, an overweight cardiologist seems to be a walking contraction, but if a middle-aged, 250-pound cardiologist talks to you about making positive changes in your lifestyle, doesn't it seem more feasible than it does in the same conversation with a 26-year-old triathlete physician?
The point is, there is no perfect doctor or med school candidate. The key is that doctors should be REAL and approachable, and able to convey their knowledge and experience while remaining non-judgmental and accepting of their patients' limitations.