• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Are my publications valid?

WanderingGuitarist

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Jun 1, 2015
63
38
71
Hey guys, so prior to submitting my research papers, I looked for a journal to see if its pubmed indexed on this site: List of All Journals Cited in PubMed

I looked at the .txt file that was on the site and picked a journal from it.

Today, I looked to see if my papers are on pubmed and I found out that the journal is not medline indexed ( thus wont be showing up on pubmed I believe)

Did I royally screw up and make it so that my publications are not useful for ERAS/residency?
 

Attachments

  • J_Medline.txt
    7.5 MB · Views: 45

Cawolf

PGY-1
7+ Year Member
Feb 27, 2013
3,469
2,285
226
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Journal name would be a better way to try to answer this question. As a novice researcher the investigators I have worked with would only submit to indexed journals.
 
About the Ads

AlteredScale

Full Member
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
7+ Year Member
May 10, 2013
8,443
3
7,907
526
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Hey guys, so prior to submitting my research papers, I looked for a journal to see if its pubmed indexed on this site: List of All Journals Cited in PubMed

I looked at the .txt file that was on the site and picked a journal from it.

Today, I looked to see if my papers are on pubmed and I found out that the journal is not medline indexed ( thus wont be showing up on pubmed I believe)

Did I royally screw up and make it so that my publications are not useful for ERAS/residency?

There's not overarching answer to this. Your application is going to be at the table of a wide variety of PDs APDs and faculty members, some may make note of the fact that it isn't pubmed indexed and ask you perhaps, others may skip over it, it depends largely on the faculty and also the specialty you are hoping to apply to.

At the end of the day it's not a big deal so as long as the rest of your app is order.
 
Jun 11, 2010
67,017
2
103,017
276
Somewhere west of St. Louis
  1. Non-Student
Hey guys, so prior to submitting my research papers, I looked for a journal to see if its pubmed indexed on this site: List of All Journals Cited in PubMed

I looked at the .txt file that was on the site and picked a journal from it.

Today, I looked to see if my papers are on pubmed and I found out that the journal is not medline indexed ( thus wont be showing up on pubmed I believe)

Did I royally screw up and make it so that my publications are not useful for ERAS/residency?
Ask your school's librarians if this is a predatory journal.

Sometimes brand new, valid journals take time to get onto the Pubmed list
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Dr G Oogle

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Mar 8, 2017
502
781
116
Did you have to pay for publication? If yes and not on pubmed than it is a predatory journal. If peer reviewed but not on pubmed and considered a Low level journal.

I do not think a pub is a pub. We had a fellow applicant who had 7 pubs but all were in open source journals, even though were on pubmed and I’d much rather someone have 1 publication in a legit peer reviewed journal. Unless You chose the open source option after your journal has already been peer reviewed (many established journals offer this) the peer review process for even pubmed indexed open source journals is suspect at best since there is a clear conflict of interest between accepting a paper and getting payment for its acceptance.

the answer to your question is if you are applying for a competive specialty for which research is more or less mandatory than you might have screwed yourself, if the you are not applying to such a specialty than at worst you’ll be judged on your non-research characteristics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

FistLength

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Apr 11, 2012
348
596
216
  1. Resident [Any Field]
There are certainly gradations in the quality of publications, but for the most part people interviewing have to wade through so many applications most won't scrutinize where something was published, especially for medical students. I would almost guarantee an attending will not search if something is pubmed indexed or not. The only exception I can think of is if the journal is truly heinous, like acta fakery international.

They will look at your research activity, see a couple of lines with your name on it, and move on. During the actual interview they might bring something up asking specifically about projects, but not to discredit them. Attendings know the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

pbrocks15

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Mar 20, 2014
992
507
166
  1. Medical Student
Did you have to pay for publication? If yes and not on pubmed than it is a predatory journal. If peer reviewed but not on pubmed and considered a Low level journal.

I do not think a pub is a pub. We had a fellow applicant who had 7 pubs but all were in open source journals, even though were on pubmed and I’d much rather someone have 1 publication in a legit peer reviewed journal. Unless You chose the open source option after your journal has already been peer reviewed (many established journals offer this) the peer review process for even pubmed indexed open source journals is suspect at best since there is a clear conflict of interest between accepting a paper and getting payment for its acceptance.

the answer to your question is if you are applying for a competive specialty for which research is more or less mandatory than you might have screwed yourself, if the you are not applying to such a specialty than at worst you’ll be judged on your non-research characteristics.

How is it that he screws himself over for a competitive specality by this?
 

Dr G Oogle

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Mar 8, 2017
502
781
116
Because a attendings in specialty that really cares about research will be able to easily determine if a journal is indexed or not . Having a publication in a non-indexed journal won’t hurt you it just won’t help you much. It’s better than nothing just not much better, will essentially count as research experience + abstract or something of that level.
 

DameJulie

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Apr 23, 2016
1,523
580
166
  1. Medical Student
I asked ONE PD about this, and he said if it’s a pub it’s a pub, indexed or not. Obviously if the pub is in his field (e.g General Surgery), then he’ll see if the journal is index or not, or if he’s familiar with the journal. For journals outside his field, he doesn’t have the knowledge/time to figure out whether it’s indexed or not.
 

OnePunchBiopsy

Allergies: Clinic
7+ Year Member
Feb 3, 2014
949
2,216
226
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Many good points here.

If using “medical student” as a frame of reference, getting published is all that really matters. It’s an extra line on your CV that can’t really hurt you. Yes, while people in select specialties may be able to discern if your research in that field is high impact, as a medical student, simply being in such a publication is good. Where research is published is not going to be a penalty, simply because many medical students don’t have research to begin with.

OP, I wouldn’t sweat the lack of Pubmed indexing. It’s a good lesson for research endeavors during your residency, but at this point in your career it doesn’t really matter. It will matter later when you apply for a job, and much later if you apply for a full professorship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
About the Ads
This thread is more than 1 year old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.