Again, point is the same, at that level of competition, the experience counts. Either experiences in other areas that are relevant (I named a couple) or actual zoo experience (and I mean that in terms of getting externships, internships, and residencies along with courses). Yes, classes vary. Our zoo med class is also attended by our residents and includes prep for boards. This isn't like undergrad to vet school where applicants are coming from hundreds of schools; it isn't difficult to check on what the classes are like at the school. At max, isn't it still less than 35 calls if you had to check at every school. And it is a very small world; most of the DACZMs know each other. I am NOT saying it isn't possible to do this at every single vet school; I believe it is and have encouraged students to make the choice of what school to attend on other factors, but I do think that it may take extra work. I know I stand out in my class for zoo med, along with another student, because we are both actively involved in zoo med research already (bear vision, sea turtle neuro.) That isnt part of the requirements for zoo med focus, but it is strongly suggested. I am also NOT saying that grades dont matter; they do. But realistically, if you have two students with 3.8 GPA, top ranked, excellent LORs, what will be used to select externs, interns, and residents? ECs in the field will count (whether those are classes, clubs, volunteer opportunities, etc.)
Again, I could easily be wrong. I just dont see why residents and DACZMs would mislead individuals in the zoo med focus area. Also, I dont assume that all the fields are the same when it comes to how residents are selected
nor that all resident selection committees operate the same. This is just what was shared with our zoo focus students. I know our anesthesiologist has talked about how they select residents for very different qualities than emergency care and surgery. I even know one committee here will not take a resident that graduates with a 4.0 (not saying it is right or wrong, but what members of the selection committee shared with me; they feel it is a reflection on priorities and error recovery
.and was told they rejected an exceptional candidate for that reason alone.) my opinion is worth the $ paid.