Guys,
So i was accepted to some schools, paid my deposit on my state school, fully disclosed my misdemeanor on the application, called and chatted with the current dean about it (who said it wouldnt be a problem) etc.
they just called me in for a meeting for me to discuss the misdemeanor. They mentioned they would now have to give their recommendation to the dean.
during the meeting i felt like i was on trial for the misdemeanor again (reckless driving).
I believe I am now waiting on them to confirm my acceptance.
The point of the thread? A warning. On december 1st when youre acceptances roll in, before deciding on the school get in writing that youre background is ok. Dont be caught in the situation I am in where I cannot now go to another school who doesnt care as the deposit was due 6 months ago. It is completely possible that I may have to apply again this year (late now) and matriculate a year late to another institution who doesnt care. As logical as it is to say "well i disclosed my transgression and was still accepted, how can they ethically now deny me a month before matriculation" is, we can see here that it is not the case (at least at this institution).
Now that my other acceptances are off the table, Im completely at their mercy, without leverage, and not sure how my lifes about to be decided by hitting a parked car without insurance (the committee said, and i quote "well sometimes you can get reckless driving by knowing the judge and he reduces it from a DUI" and then got a lecture on drinking and driving and how they dont tolerate it (IE lectured on drinking when my conviction had nothing to do with drinking).
frankly this morning was insulting, degrading, nerve wracking, and Id like to spare you the experience.
So i was accepted to some schools, paid my deposit on my state school, fully disclosed my misdemeanor on the application, called and chatted with the current dean about it (who said it wouldnt be a problem) etc.
they just called me in for a meeting for me to discuss the misdemeanor. They mentioned they would now have to give their recommendation to the dean.
during the meeting i felt like i was on trial for the misdemeanor again (reckless driving).
I believe I am now waiting on them to confirm my acceptance.
The point of the thread? A warning. On december 1st when youre acceptances roll in, before deciding on the school get in writing that youre background is ok. Dont be caught in the situation I am in where I cannot now go to another school who doesnt care as the deposit was due 6 months ago. It is completely possible that I may have to apply again this year (late now) and matriculate a year late to another institution who doesnt care. As logical as it is to say "well i disclosed my transgression and was still accepted, how can they ethically now deny me a month before matriculation" is, we can see here that it is not the case (at least at this institution).
Now that my other acceptances are off the table, Im completely at their mercy, without leverage, and not sure how my lifes about to be decided by hitting a parked car without insurance (the committee said, and i quote "well sometimes you can get reckless driving by knowing the judge and he reduces it from a DUI" and then got a lecture on drinking and driving and how they dont tolerate it (IE lectured on drinking when my conviction had nothing to do with drinking).
frankly this morning was insulting, degrading, nerve wracking, and Id like to spare you the experience.