- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0


Has anyone gotten an acceptance from the school after thinking that they bombed the interview?
what do you guys consider 'bombing' an interview?
what do you guys consider 'bombing' an interview?
Fair question. Anyone want to explain??
Usually interviewers start out smiling and joke around with you a little. If your able to keep a smile on their face throughout your interview your doing good, but if you start to notice a change in how they talk to you or they seem to get really serious all of the sudden, your probably in the process of bombing it...
Dude, I really bombed the interviews at both schools I got accepted to and rocked the interviews at places I got waitlisted for. So for me, interviews haven't really been important.
Are interviews make-or-break situations for everyone or only for those whose applications are marginally qualified?

my jaw started locking up hardcore(dang tmj!!!) infront of my interviewers so i couldnt really speak well. 🙁
how embarrassing!!
... But i got in!! They probably have me signed up for tmj surgery.![]()
I think it likely varies by school. My interviewer at Stony Brook told me that they more highly consider your GPA, DAT, and quality of your undergrad (and of course state residency) more than your interview. Kinda made me wonder what the point of an interview was in that case, I guess just to see that you're not a lunatic. Schools who have rejected applicants with high DAT and GPAs after interview -- well that tells you that they must have cared about the interview, doesn't it?
My Pitt interview was awkward at best, but they accepted me. I was really surprised.
You have to also look at the school's numbers. I mean Midwestern interviews 3000+ students and only accepts 110, so interviews must mean something, whereas some schools it is more like a 1:2 ratio so you are almost already in before the interview begins.
does anyone know how much weighting case places on their interviews?