Barron's ERROR?

Discussion in 'DAT Discussions' started by joonkimdds, Jul 24, 2006.

  1. joonkimdds

    joonkimdds Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    I heard that Barron has many errors.
    well...i just purcahsed Barron's DAT cuz...i thought it looked good and cheap :)

    if u guys found errors, is it from explanation or practice exams?

    if explanation doesn't have errors, at least i can use it to read through and learn withouit taking the test.

    and if practice exam has errors, could u guys tell me which problems have what kind of errors?

    what other materials beside Kaplan blue book and barron's dat would u guys recommand me to use?

    I heard that DAT achiever and topscores are good but i don't wanna use computer based study aid. I am a book person :p
     
  2. Thread continues after this sponsor message. SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. teefRcool

    teefRcool Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Practice exams lotta answers are wrong and lotta asnwers for PAT are wrong as well.
     
  4. joonkimdds

    joonkimdds Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    so does that mean answer sheet itself is wrong or the problem doesn't even have a correct answer?
     
  5. dat_student

    dat_student Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    both
     
  6. Notoriousjae

    Notoriousjae DAT Rockstar

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental





    heres an example of what i am talking about. click the link

    http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=291218
     
  7. joonkimdds

    joonkimdds Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    1 guy wrote that barron's explanation is good :laugh:
    on page 113, it says Magnetic quantum number are integers from -1 to +1.
    Shouldn't it be -L to +L?
     

Share This Page