Baylor Anesthesiology

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DrMedicine

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I wanted to know if anyone out there has done a student rotation at Baylor in Houston. Third year student here interested in doing a rotation there next fall and wanted to see the thoughts and comments of some of you all who might have been there? Thanks!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hey guys, I wanted to know if anyone out there has done a student rotation at Baylor in Houston. Third year student here interested in doing a rotation there next fall and wanted to see the thoughts and comments of some of you all who might have been there? Thanks!

I'd like to hear thoughts/opinions on the Baylor medical student rotation and anesthesiology program as a whole as well.
 
hey guys, i wanted to know if anyone could shed some light on what happened to Dr. Lydia Conlay Baylor's Anesthesiology chair? On the baylor anesthesiology website it now lists Dr. Maya Suresh as the Interim Chair. Will this change have any effect on the residency program? Is there something in the program happening that we all need to know about?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
As a disclaimer first, I'm a Baylor CA-2 resident, so you can take everything I say with that in mind. I'm not an expert about what's going on here, but I live with it everyday.

As for the change, yep, new interim chair, new interim vice chair ... a lot of changes at the upper administrative level. Honestly though, I don't know how much this is going to change my day to day life as a resident. As of right now, the money I make, the hours I work, and the places I train are completely unchanged. Dr. Suresh and Dr. Raty (new interim vice chair; residency director) have been at Baylor for a long time, and I think they have good relationships with the people who run the other sub-departments. I think the relationships that the residency has with the hospitals in the Texas Medical Center (Texas Children's, Texas Heart, MD Anderson, VA) can only get stronger. With the exception of MD Anderson, the attending anesthesiologists at those institutions are Baylor faculty (and I think the VA has some anesthesiologists that aren't Baylor faculty, but the ones that are faculty someplace, are Baylor faculty).

Many of the people who interviewed at Baylor this year very likely interviewed with Dr. Suresh. She's the chief of obstetric anesthesia here and I would say she's probably universally liked among the residents. From my very limited point of view, her department is well run, and residents like rotating there. You'll work with both Dr. Suresh and Dr. Raty in the ORs here, they are both approachable and have a genuine concern for the residents and the residency, and I think they want them both to be excellent.

But some things are going to change, they have to, otherwise, why switch chairs? Dr. Suresh is going to give a talk at Grand Rounds here in a couple of weeks about the direction the department is going. Honestly, I think it's well within you're rights to know what's said at that conference. You should know everything you can before you make a final decision.

Good luck, I can't imagine this makes the residency decsion any easier.
 
Rumor has it that UT Houston and Baylor will be merging. Lydia was the only obstacle for this to happen and thus was forced to resign. Though this is rumor, it seems very likely.
 
Cankles, or anyone who knows...

If there is a merger, who will the residency fall under; UT or Baylor?

Also, what is it that makes it very likely to happen?
 
As a disclaimer first, I'm a Baylor CA-2 resident, so you can take everything I say with that in mind. I'm not an expert about what's going on here, but I live with it everyday.

As for the change, yep, new interim chair, new interim vice chair ... a lot of changes at the upper administrative level. Honestly though, I don't know how much this is going to change my day to day life as a resident. As of right now, the money I make, the hours I work, and the places I train are completely unchanged. Dr. Suresh and Dr. Raty (new interim vice chair; residency director) have been at Baylor for a long time, and I think they have good relationships with the people who run the other sub-departments. I think the relationships that the residency has with the hospitals in the Texas Medical Center (Texas Children's, Texas Heart, MD Anderson, VA) can only get stronger. With the exception of MD Anderson, the attending anesthesiologists at those institutions are Baylor faculty (and I think the VA has some anesthesiologists that aren't Baylor faculty, but the ones that are faculty someplace, are Baylor faculty).

Many of the people who interviewed at Baylor this year very likely interviewed with Dr. Suresh. She's the chief of obstetric anesthesia here and I would say she's probably universally liked among the residents. From my very limited point of view, her department is well run, and residents like rotating there. You'll work with both Dr. Suresh and Dr. Raty in the ORs here, they are both approachable and have a genuine concern for the residents and the residency, and I think they want them both to be excellent.

But some things are going to change, they have to, otherwise, why switch chairs? Dr. Suresh is going to give a talk at Grand Rounds here in a couple of weeks about the direction the department is going. Honestly, I think it's well within you're rights to know what's said at that conference. You should know everything you can before you make a final decision.

Good luck, I can't imagine this makes the residency decsion any easier.


Did the talk with Dr. Suresh happen? If yes, any details on the future of Baylor anesthesiology? Merger with UT-Houston? etc. Thanks.
 
i'm about to interview for a CA-1 position here (2007) soon and was wondering what i needed to know to be successful. please help! thanks
 
Since the application cycle officially begins today, I wanted to see if there was any new information on the happenings at Baylor? Thanks!
 
Hi,
I am not going into anesthesia, but I have done a SICU rotation and will do an ob anesthesia rotation soon. I think the field is great, and I think the UTMB prgm. is great and have heard from others in the know that it is a very good prgm esp. in the South. For those of you interested in Baylor, why not consider UTMB?
 
UTMB is a good program. I just ranked them lower because I couldn't see myself living in Galveston!

Hi,
I am not going into anesthesia, but I have done a SICU rotation and will do an ob anesthesia rotation soon. I think the field is great, and I think the UTMB prgm. is great and have heard from others in the know that it is a very good prgm esp. in the South. For those of you interested in Baylor, why not consider UTMB?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
UTMB is a good program. I just ranked them lower because I couldn't see myself living in Galveston!
Yeah, I can understand some of the aversion to living in Galvetrez. There are quite a few residents that live off the island also....like UTSW said going
against the flow of traffic.
 
Hi,
I am not going into anesthesia, but I have done a SICU rotation and will do an ob anesthesia rotation soon. I think the field is great, and I think the UTMB prgm. is great and have heard from others in the know that it is a very good prgm esp. in the South. For those of you interested in Baylor, why not consider UTMB?

Nykka3, thanks for the helpful info on UTMB!

anyone else have info on baylor? thanks!
 
Hey,

Any Baylor residents out there can tell me some more about your program. Are you guys happy and how do you think your training is, do you feel comfortable in all the different aspects of anesthesia? How good is baylor and job placement, I know baylor has a great name in general, but how about specifically in the anesthesia field? Could you please shed any aspects of your program you like and don't like? Also most importantly what about the rumors that you don't have enough cases and double up with SRNA?
 
Apart from doubling up with student doctor registered nurse anesthetist/ologists and having nurses as 'anesthesiology faculty' at baylor college of medicine, is there a general atmosphere of being sell-outs or is it mostly behind the scenes? With nurses as your faculty, are you eligible to apply for crna jobs or are you limited to 'MDA' jobs because of the letters behind your name? Similarly, are the doctor nurse graduates from baylor eligible for attending jobs?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apart from doubling up with student doctor registered nurse anesthetist/ologists and having nurses as 'anesthesiology faculty' at baylor college of medicine, is there a general atmosphere of being sell-outs or is it mostly behind the scenes? With nurses as your faculty, are you eligible to apply for crna jobs or are you limited to 'MDA' jobs because of the letters behind your name? Similarly, are the doctor nurse graduates from baylor eligible for attending jobs?
I have been a long-time lurker of this board (I'm talking 5 years plus), and obviously don't get involved in discussions very often, but felt that this thread needed an informed reply after reading the ridiculous statement above.

I am a current upper-level resident at BCM. No, I don't agree with the level of CRNA infiltration into the department nor the fact that soon they will begin training DNP nurses. As I imagine there are most places, faculty exist who are apathetic and probably "sell-outs" to the system because they frankly don't care if you are a SRNA or MD resident as long as they don't get called away from their coffee/internet surfing to give a hand in the room. But believe me, most of us (attendings and residents) are fighting from the inside to change things, but it may appear slow from the outside because the CRNA/SRNA group at Baylor is large, extremely political, and an easy source of extra labor (as viewed by those in upper administration). I don't believe posting words like those above helps anything -- it stirs dissension amongst us MDs and meanwhile the SRNAs/CRNAs gain ground. It would be much more beneficial if we both focused our attention against their efforts.

However, I don't feel as if their training program has hurt my residency training in the least. We are NEVER doubled in rooms with SRNAs -- this thread was the first time I saw this rumor and what prompted me to reply. As a rule, the SRNAs will get assigned the least complicated cases of the day (e.g. phacos, ortho, gen surg) and will be assigned a CRNA supervisor who is also supervised by an MD. More difficult/interesting cases (hearts, livers, double lumens, anything requiring a block, etc) obviously go to the resident. The only exception to this is if an emergent case (e.g. trauma) comes to the OR and all available trainees offer help to get the case started.

As for the rumor of not enough cases -- again, I'm not sure where this started from. As far as I know, no graduating resident has had any problem getting their numbers. We rotate through Ben Taub (county hospital with lots of trauma and also main source of OB), Texas Heart, Texas Children's, the Houston VA (~20 ORs and a national liver transplant and neurosurg/cariothoracic referral center), and over the past couple years at least two months at Methodist (CVICU and CVORs). We have plenty of cases daily; in fact, a couple services in particular are chronically short on residents so you may actually bounce between a couple cases some days if there is something interesting to do (e.g. I started a MVR and once chest was open the attending took over so I could go to PACU and place an interscalene catheter for a shoulder which the SRNA then took back and I went back to the heart).

I am happy with my training. I still have about 1.5 years left but feel comfortable in virtually any case thrown my way. The one area in which we could benefit from more exposure is probably regional, even though I'm proficient with the plain vanilla upper extremity/lower extremity blocks.

Sorry for the long post, but hope this answered a couple questions. If there's any more, I'm happy to answer them since I've finally broken down and registered!
 
Apart from doubling up with student doctor registered nurse anesthetist/ologists and having nurses as 'anesthesiology faculty' at baylor college of medicine, is there a general atmosphere of being sell-outs or is it mostly behind the scenes? With nurses as your faculty, are you eligible to apply for crna jobs or are you limited to 'MDA' jobs because of the letters behind your name? Similarly, are the doctor nurse graduates from baylor eligible for attending jobs?

I have been a long-time lurker of this board (I'm talking 5 years plus), and obviously don't get involved in discussions very often, but felt that this thread needed an informed reply after reading the ridiculous statement above.

I am a current upper-level resident at BCM. No, I don't agree with the level of CRNA infiltration into the department nor the fact that soon they will begin training DNP nurses. As I imagine there are most places, faculty exist who are apathetic and probably "sell-outs" to the system because they frankly don't care if you are a SRNA or MD resident as long as they don't get called away from their coffee/internet surfing to give a hand in the room. But believe me, most of us (attendings and residents) are fighting from the inside to change things, but it may appear slow from the outside because the CRNA/SRNA group at Baylor is large, extremely political, and an easy source of extra labor (as viewed by those in upper administration). I don't believe posting words like those above helps anything -- it stirs dissension amongst us MDs and meanwhile the SRNAs/CRNAs gain ground. It would be much more beneficial if we both focused our attention against their efforts.

However, I don't feel as if their training program has hurt my residency training in the least. We are NEVER doubled in rooms with SRNAs -- this thread was the first time I saw this rumor and what prompted me to reply. As a rule, the SRNAs will get assigned the least complicated cases of the day (e.g. phacos, ortho, gen surg) and will be assigned a CRNA supervisor who is also supervised by an MD. More difficult/interesting cases (hearts, livers, double lumens, anything requiring a block, etc) obviously go to the resident. The only exception to this is if an emergent case (e.g. trauma) comes to the OR and all available trainees offer help to get the case started.

As for the rumor of not enough cases -- again, I'm not sure where this started from. As far as I know, no graduating resident has had any problem getting their numbers. We rotate through Ben Taub (county hospital with lots of trauma and also main source of OB), Texas Heart, Texas Children's, the Houston VA (~20 ORs and a national liver transplant and neurosurg/cariothoracic referral center), and over the past couple years at least two months at Methodist (CVICU and CVORs). We have plenty of cases daily; in fact, a couple services in particular are chronically short on residents so you may actually bounce between a couple cases some days if there is something interesting to do (e.g. I started a MVR and once chest was open the attending took over so I could go to PACU and place an interscalene catheter for a shoulder which the SRNA then took back and I went back to the heart).

I am happy with my training. I still have about 1.5 years left but feel comfortable in virtually any case thrown my way. The one area in which we could benefit from more exposure is probably regional, even though I'm proficient with the plain vanilla upper extremity/lower extremity blocks.

Sorry for the long post, but hope this answered a couple questions. If there's any more, I'm happy to answer them since I've finally broken down and registered!

I had not realized this about Baylor. Before I make a rash decision about interviewing there, is the CRNA presence there more prevalent than other academic programs? I understand CRNAs are everywhere, but this makes it seem like Baylor is run by the nurses.

I understand it hasn't hurt your training, but if it's a prevailing philosophy there and the trend continues, it can affect my training.
 
I cannot make a fair comparison between programs as Baylor is the only system I have trained within. If you don't want anything to do with SRNAs/CRNAs, then you probably should pick programs that don't hire/train them. Baylor's CRNAs have traditionally been very active in the AANA/political organizations but are generally nice to interact with and not pushy/militant/bitter.

I can tell you that 99% of the time the SRNAs/CRNAs are not even on my radar because they are in other rooms under other supervision. The other 1% of the time are little things like telling them about a pt being moved to their room that I may have pre-op'd, securing a difficult airway on one of their patients, etc. Not stuff that hinders my education a bit.

As for being 'run' by the nurses -- MD's are definitely in charge of the administration and day-to-day functioning of the department. CRNA's fall under the allied health umbrella and because of this have gotten away with being labeled as "associate professor", etc. This is because they are, indeed an "associate professor" within the anesthesia arm of the allied health department, but does not equate to the "associate professor" in the department of anesthesiology for an MD. Yes, I agree this is confusing and, in my opinion, dishonest titling, but that's the way it is. Again, not anything that changes my daily education.

Once again, a somewhat long post but I want to make sure you get an honest answer.
 
I cannot make a fair comparison between programs as Baylor is the only system I have trained within. If you don't want anything to do with SRNAs/CRNAs, then you probably should pick programs that don't hire/train them. Baylor's CRNAs have traditionally been very active in the AANA/political organizations but are generally nice to interact with and not pushy/militant/bitter.

I can tell you that 99% of the time the SRNAs/CRNAs are not even on my radar because they are in other rooms under other supervision. The other 1% of the time are little things like telling them about a pt being moved to their room that I may have pre-op'd, securing a difficult airway on one of their patients, etc. Not stuff that hinders my education a bit.

As for being 'run' by the nurses -- MD's are definitely in charge of the administration and day-to-day functioning of the department. CRNA's fall under the allied health umbrella and because of this have gotten away with being labeled as "associate professor", etc. This is because they are, indeed an "associate professor" within the anesthesia arm of the allied health department, but does not equate to the "associate professor" in the department of anesthesiology for an MD. Yes, I agree this is confusing and, in my opinion, dishonest titling, but that's the way it is. Again, not anything that changes my daily education.

Once again, a somewhat long post but I want to make sure you get an honest answer.


Not in front of you.
 
What is the reputation you guys have in the texas area? I understand that you feel the SRNA are not hindering your education, and that you have enough exposure to cases to feel comfortable in everything except some regional. However, when looking for jobs it is important what academic centers or private practice groups think of your education. Granted baylor has a great name in medicine, but in particular in anesthesia want do people think of your education. Are you guys considered to be the best trained anesthesiologists in Texas. Or are you guys looked over when compared to other training programs in Texas? I'm asking because im not from texas but would like to train there. Baylor is a program I am considering.
 
What is the reputation you guys have in the texas area? I understand that you feel the SRNA are not hindering your education, and that you have enough exposure to cases to feel comfortable in everything except some regional. However, when looking for jobs it is important what academic centers or private practice groups think of your education. Granted baylor has a great name in medicine, but in particular in anesthesia want do people think of your education. Are you guys considered to be the best trained anesthesiologists in Texas. Or are you guys looked over when compared to other training programs in Texas? I'm asking because im not from texas but would like to train there. Baylor is a program I am considering.
That's a touchy one to answer. Inevitably, when talking of reputation in Texas, the conversation will devolve into a shouting match between people trained in different institutions. For fellowships, many people from BCM try to stay in the Houston area, and have no problem getting spots at THI or Texas Childrens (although word is, this year TCH will participate in some sort of match program, so not sure how that will affect things). Others in the classes ahead of me have also headed out of state to places like Cleveland Clinic. As for straight-out-of-residency job searches, you will find a mixed bag of reactions to the Baylor name. Most are good -- several people two years ahead of me landed very attractive jobs that were not even publicly posted, or in tough markets like the Austin and Dallas burbs. If you are a struggling resident with blemishes on your record you will have a more difficult time no matter what. I did hear of some particular, related groups in the Houston area with a less-than-stellar opinion of Baylor, along the lines of 'book smart but clinically lacking.' I don't know if these groups had particular bad experiences, or maybe it stems from the fact that a majority of their new-hires are graduates from a program that happens to be across the street. Either way, the interviewees that received this response ended up with great jobs at other groups in the area anyway.
 
Houstondreaming, could you tell me a little bit about your day to day schedule? What time you in and what time you out? How often are you on call and what types of call are there (long call, short call, overnight, ext.) How often and what time are lectures? Are they class specific or are they for all the residents? Sorry for so many questions.
 
Okay so the resident never replied to my question but no big deal because I came back from my Baylor interview and I am posting my thoughts:
Program is very resident friendly. They program is tailored towards resident education and not about servicing the department. Case in point they don't have you cover unnecessary cases after your scheduled cases for the day they just send you home, thats why their hours are so great (we were quoted 48 on average by the chief, but I think he is averaging in vacation so more like 55-60). Another thing is when they are on their specialty rotations (peds, cardiac, ext.) thats all they do, and thats all their lectures are specific for. Very focused on learning. I interviewed also at UT Houston and UT southwestern but in my opinion this is the most resident friendly program. Other than a few snooty people I met, the experience was great and the residents and attendings are chill. Im not from texas but this is in my opinion an awesome program and one of the best in the south. Hands down my favorite program of all the programs I interviewed at in the south including the other two Texas program which were good program too.

Oh yeah, the CRNA/SRNA program affects the residents not even one bit. They are really taking the left over cases that the residents don't want and cover for the resident cases when they have lectures. In your CA-3 year the residents run the board, so they give the great cases to their fellow CA-1 and CA-2 residents obviously and the rest to the nurses. Also the methodist split affected resident education not one bit. The affiliation baylor has with methodist is dept specific. Anesthesia still does rotations at methodist, and you will work there as a resident but one change they did do was stop doing cardiac at methodist and instead are doing at the Texas heart institute. Really nothing but good came out of that deal cuz THI is world renowned for cardiac. Also the interim Chair Dr. Maya Suresh is now the Chair fully. The program is solid and improving. If you guys have any questions you can ask.
 
Last edited:
Agree, except CRNA/SRNA program has a HUGE impact. For the first 3-6 months, CA-1s double up on each case and they both count the case. This is due to the lack of cases since CRNAs have a monopoly at BTGH and the attendings don't want to stand up to them. Also, only program in Texas to not have moonlighting since cheap labor is already readily available. My other dislike, really low pay despite asking for $100/month for parking. Sub-specialty training is top-notch though and if you want Cardiac you are pretty much guaranteed a spot at THI.
 
Yeah I agree that the pay was low on top of the 100$/month parking they take from you. The moonlighting thing was explained that they wanted you to go home and read and not focus on making money during residency but I see your point with cheap labor being around being another reason. UT Houston had moonlighting and the residents took full advantage of it because Houston is cheap but not that cheap. Also the 2 weeks/yr vacation for pgy1 and 3 weeks/yr vacation for the rest of the years is low for people from the north. We want 4 weeks/year vacation every year in residency plus the additional week for educational leaves. Nonetheless a great program.
 
Last edited:
Agree, except CRNA/SRNA program has a HUGE impact. For the first 3-6 months, CA-1s double up on each case and they both count the case. This is due to the lack of cases since CRNAs have a monopoly at BTGH and the attendings don't want to stand up to them. Also, only program in Texas to not have moonlighting since cheap labor is already readily available. My other dislike, really low pay despite asking for $100/month for parking. Sub-specialty training is top-notch though and if you want Cardiac you are pretty much guaranteed a spot at THI.

I remember reading these Forums many years ago before I started residency and never could find much on Baylor, so seeing this post, I thought I would weigh in…

I went to Baylor then did a Fellowship in our Texas Medical Center, now in private practice. As others have pointed out, as a Baylor resident, a Fellowship in any specialty there is mostly a given if you want it, unless you are just really unreliable (in that case, you don’t deserve one anyhow)...
But in any case, unless something has changed, doubling up on cases with a SRNA is absolutely incorrect information. Never happened. Doubt it ever will.

When I was there a few years back the breakup with The Methodist Hospital occurred and during that time _only_ we were scrambling for specialty cases in residency for a few months while the breakup then the merger with St. Luke's occurred. During that breakup there was perhaps a month of sharing with other residents while things got reorganized. Then it quickly changed to sending folks home early instead of sharing for a few months, then back to normal. But that breakup is ancient history now ?four-five years back?. I liked Texas Heart better for learning hearts anyways...

As far as SRNAs are concerned, most of us residents were rather anti them for obvious political reasons. But it is really a non-issue. At the worst, they are a competitor for cases at the Ben Taub county hospital where you just start to learn your general anesthesia. But this is non-important in practice for a variety of reasons. Trust me, it isn't a big issue. After hours the senior resident on call runs the board as he/she wishes and tends to give the good cases to the juniors and the less desirable to the SRNAs, but really in the middle of the night, most folks appreciate being in the rotation with as _many _ other folks as possible so you can get rest. Ben Taub runs many cases all night long, there is more than enough to go around and the SRNA help carry the load, for good or for bad.

They are trained by their own faculty, the CRNAs that are there. The CRNA faculty know it is a touchy subject amongst the residents so they tended to steer clear of us. It is really pretty close to having two separate anesthesia groups in one large OR set up. Really, sometimes we all meet at the board to figure out what cases are being covered where and by whom and after that you don't really interact with the SRNAs too much unless you are on call as I already discussed.

CRNAs running things? LMAO! Not even. They unfort have a training program there. I wish they did not, but they do. The Anesthesiologist running Ben Taub tries to balance reasonably fairly there since there are two training programs, but really it is a moot point because Ben Taub is really the only place this is an issue, and BEN TAUB IS JUST FOR LEARNING YOUR MOST BASIC ANESTHESIOLOGY! Plus, the better stuff still went to the residents, and the current chair is definitely pro resident and not balanced between MD and CRNA issues.

Who cares if a SRNA gets to go do another fractured femur repair at Ben Taub! You learn how to do that the first four- six months of training. I remember we used to gripe in our CA-1 year that a SRNA would do a child case maybe once per month, and we thought they were “stealing it” from us. What a joke. The real learning of the Pediatric subspecialty in Anesthesia is not doing 1 pedi case per month at Ben Taub County Hospital. It is doing insane complex cases at Baylor's Texas Children's Hospital in your CA-2 year. It was #4 in the Nation when I was there. They were doing intra utero fetal surgeries. I did senior rotation in Pedi Hearts and did hypoplastic left hearts in infants and every type of cardiac shunt case you can pronounce. Insane stuff. So a SRNA stealing an ankle fracture in an 8 year old at Ben Taub Hospital? Go for it SRNA, I learned that already...

Look, I don't care anymore if you folks like Baylor or not because my training is completed and I have moved away. The main reason it has never been discussed much on these boards for years, is that Baylor is primarily a place to get superb clinical training, _not_ academic training. When you look at rankings of schools the research places get the highest ranks. Pretty much holds for all fields. So if you want to be on the front line of research, or pursue a hardcore academia future, go elsewhere. If you want to be on the front line of great surgeries then this is the place. That has always been the Achilles Heel of Baylor Anesthesia. We don't do research and so the name only gets out in clinical, not academic, circles. But when it comes to surgery, that is what Baylor is best known for! And we were/are their anesthesiologists…

It is a hidden jewel if you want to learn to be a clinical anesthesiologist. Bar none, one of the best clinical training programs around. And we were pretty damn happy and liked it that way and didn't care if anyone put us in their top ten list or not... Other programs _do_ do better academic/research anesthesia, but Baylor has always been about the surgical programs historically. And that is still alive in the Texas Medical Center. I am not trying to be arrogant but few other places can match the high level surgeries that take place in the TMC, a few can _match_ what we do, but none pass us by much... There are just too many specialty hospitals all located in one location, and we do their anesthesia. Look up the helicopter photos of the Texas Medical Center sometime, the TMC is a city, not a hospital.

Here is the reality if you want to learn to be a good clinical anesthesiologist. You want to be at the place where the high level surgeries are taking place so you can learn to deliver anesthesia to those cases in the future. Or if you choose go out into private practice and likely never see anything like that in the future, at least during your training, you saw it…

These are the fields, imho, you want to get good at (in no partic order) if you want to be a strong clinician in Anesthesiology:
Cardiothoracic
Pediatric
Neurosurgery
Trauma
OB
General cases

Now, less important, but nice skillsets to have are:
Regional blocks, etc
Out patient surgery
Pain training

The crucial point is the specialty rotations that are available at Baylor are superb. Those occur at various hospitals in the Texas Medical Center. There is no competition with SRNAs at these places. Now I am going to try and review these things for you to see how Baylor does at them. I will try to be objective, but realize I trained there and loved it, so I am biased. Otoh, I don’t even live in Texas anymore so I don’t have much vested interest there anymore… So the review, point by point:

Our cardiac training _was_ at the Methodist (DeBakey's cardiac hospital) and now is at Texas Heart Institute (Cooley's cardiac Hospital). Both those places are extremely good sites for cardiac. Much of American Cardiac surgery started at one or the other hospital. BiVad training, transplants, Aortic arch and thoracic aneurysm repair. Our training at THI, amazing and superb!

Pediatrics at Texas Children's Hospital. This is Baylor's Children's Hospital, many of the faculty are former Baylorites. Extremely well known hospital for Pedi. Again, crazy cases, and loads of them. Did 17 cases one day on call--Many short of course, but I was exhausted by the end of the night. Not about the numbers of course, but the _type s _ of specialty surgeries. Pediatric Craniofacial abnormalities galore. Our training at TCH, superb!

Neurosurg - here is was/?is a weak point for Baylor. Back in the day we did Nuero at St. Luke's or at Ben Taub. Note, SRNAs did _not_ steal the crani cases from whatever resident was on his/her neuro rotation there. Ben Taub cranis are frequent and good cases, but nothing extraordinary. St. Lukes as I recall is ranked nationally for neuro, so those residents who went there might have had it better. I don't know for sure, I did Ben Taub Neuro and it was good, but not superb. Probably the only surgical specialty where we were not on the front lines of the surgical cutting edge. I am not sure since I didn’t go to St. Lukes for that…. If you interview at Baylor, see how they are doing the Neuro subspecialty, as I don’t know anymore.

Trauma - Here is another area where Ben Taub shines. Imagine yourself at 2 am, Friday night call. The knife and gun crowd just getting outta the bars. You will be busy tonight… Ben Taub is the Level one trauma center in Houston. Machine gun injuries, machete injuries. Only places that could compete with that given how much Texans love their guns, could be somewhere in Detroit. You will see trauma that is unbelievable, my god the stories I have... Again, this is the site we share with SRNAs. Everyone is in the room helping start these cases, we are placing the stat lines as are the surgeons. If it is a good case, the senior resident usually will put a junior resident in the room to follow the case when the patient gets stabilized after the initial shock and awe phase is complete. If a normal boring case and the patient stable, an SRNA might finish it. Simply put, the senior wants someone in there he trusts, usually that would be you over an SRNA... Baylor trauma training, superb.

OB - now imho, what you want from O.B. training is numbers. Lots and lots of epidurals/spinal/stat C-sections. Ben Taub once again. County hospital. Huge numbers of deliveries to the migrant population. You will be sick and tired of doing epidurals here in the middle of the night. And there is even a Fellowship for O.B. Anesthesia here if you are interested. Really, I never thought a Fellowship in O.B. adds that much more to an Anesthesiologists training (feel free to differ in opinion that is fine-my point is that there isn’t really that much more to get from a specialty O.B. hospital is there?), but it certainly doesn't hurt your training having the Fellowship there too. Also, the O.B. staff are national lecturers on difficult airways. O.B. training superb due to plenty of numbers!

General cases: This occurs throughout training, but really at Ben Taub and the V.A. Pretty standard, busy hospital. Not sure if there is such a thing as being superb in this anywhere? You want numbers, lots of cases “Bread and Butter,” but not so many that you aren't learning and reading when you get home. Baylor does a good job here too. You have the general cases your first year where you learn the basics. Then later you go to the V.A. and do general cases but all the patients are ASA 4 it seems. These old vets, you can't kill em, but they are all sick as heck... The V.A. training turned out to be very helpful to advance your training on really sick folks getting general surgery. But is likely no different than V.A. training at any other hospital. Although our V.A. is a really nice building, not that that matters in the O.R…

Next:
Regional. Now here Baylor was/?is? weak. When I was there, we clamored for more regional training. We then set up a regional rotation, where you only put in blocks all day for a month. That was your job on that specialty rotation. No O.R. time. Nice improvement. But we aren't NYSORA when it comes to regional. Baylor regional - sufficient/good, not superb. May have changed an improved future, talk to the current residents…

Outpatient surgery. In private practice there is a difference between Main OR work, and outpt surgery. in Outpt, the emphasis is many cases with quick turnover. Baylor didn't really have this. The medical center is really a super specialty area, so doing lots of knee scopes and carpal tunnel releases, etc, not really something that is done there. So Baylor would be a little weak in this kind of training. But in reality, I wouldn't want to waste more than a month of my training “learning this” as it isn't really advanced stuff. Just a nice skill set to have. So since Baylor didn't have that much outpatient surgery, I made it my personal training plan to work on fast wake ups from anesthesia, regardless of what type of surgical site I was at. When at Ben Taub, turn over is sloooowwww. So irrelevant if you woke someone quickly. I learned to do it though because I thought it was important to learn. I was right. So outpatient, private practice type surgery Baylor moderate/weak. But again, I don’t think it was that important, and really wouldn’t say drop a month of subspecialty at one of our other sites just to learn this stuff anyhow. That is unless I just really wanted a change of pace…

Lastly Pain. Also a bit weak for Baylor Not really a huge pain megacenter from an Anesthesia perspective. If that is what you want, then look elsewhere. We did have a rotation at the V.A. and did lots of injections with C-arms, etc. But the high level spinal cords stims, etc. weren’t really a part of my training. I hated pain, so this wasn’t an issue for me. The Texas Medical Center also has the M.D.Anderson Cancer Center that is affiliated with U.T.Houston. They have a good pain fellowship there as I recall. If this is your interest, it is close by, not sure if Baylor has any rotation there in Pain now or not. I did do a few rotations at M.D.Anderson-ICU which was ok. Baylor pain training, moderate/sufficient.

So I have tried to give a review of Baylor’s program and how it is set up. I did attend there, and am thankful for my training. In my practice there are several Mass General, UCSF, Clevend Clinic folks and I fit in fine. My only weakness in the practice at start was regional. As I said, we started doing more while I was going there so I imagine that has improved. I never cared for Pain, so if Baylor wasn’t really hot in this specialty, I didn’t care. Baylor is still and always will be a place for strong clinical work serving the crazy surgeries that happen all over the Texas Medical Center. A grouping of so many specialty hospitals in direct proximity to each other is a pretty rare set up, and Baylor gains tremendously from that exposure.
In terms of residence happiness. We were pretty happy. A residency is a lot of work, ours was no exception, but I thought we were pretty well off most of the time. Faculty is 90-95% very nice and non malignant. _All_ places have a few bad apples to steer clear of just like Baylor did, but being Malignant is not something Baylor should be seen as. In fact when I read this site some 8 years ago that is what I read! It was not. We were pretty darn happy, still a lot of work, but pretty happy. We did at one time try to get Moonlighting to no avail. Perhaps a downside to the program. Doubt I would have signed up for much though anyhow!

About half of us went into Fellowships. The jump to Fellowship is seen as a great option for Baylor residents and is pretty smooth going into one of our specialty sites-In breeding advantage FTW. If one wanted to go elsewhere for further training, our specialist know the other places very well and were very helpful. Baylor has always done a lot of inbreeding, the medical students become residents, become Faculty. Perhaps that is a downside for an academic place, however Texas is like a nation unto itself and Texans like to stay there… Plus the medical center draws in Faculty from all over in addition to the home grown faculty.

This was not meant to be seen as an arrogant post. Just that folks outside of Baylor seldom know what happens inside the Texas Medical Center and how it is set up. Most folks who have never seen the place think it is probably just a big hospital. It is not. It is a city of hospitals all connected via air conditioned bridges throughout. Amazing. Hope this was useful. Remember when you are looking at places to train, imho you want to be around the biggest craziest surgeries around. There are several places that have that, Baylor does too. The majority do not. I was well trained, pretty happy, and am grateful for what I learned.

Good luck in your interviews and future training, wherever it may be!
 
Didn't read the whole post, way too long. Was talking about residents sharing cases, have seen it on many occasions. BTGH = Ben Taub General Hospital.
 
Sandman, no offense, but it's Capricorn 15, and you're in your last year. Time for carrousel. You can try to rationalize your decision to stay at Baylor, but in the end, you're just ascending to the giant flower in the sky and you're not gonna be renewed. You should have run for sanctuary (anywhere other than CRNA hell) while you still could have.
 
Sandman, no offense, but it's Capricorn 15, and you're in your last year. Time for carrousel. You can try to rationalize your decision to stay at Baylor, but in the end, you're just ascending to the giant flower in the sky and you're not gonna be renewed. You should have run for sanctuary (anywhere other than CRNA hell) while you still could have.

Sure you don’t mean Apollo 13? If you want a Houston Nasa reference… Or Capricorn 1? Not getting the Capricorn 15 dis.

There are two different issues going on here. One is the training of SRNAs /the presence of CRNAs anywhere; two is whether their training at Baylor impacted _my_ training.

To the first, I am 2+ years outside of Fellowship from Baylor and work in an MD only practice. I believe those who work with CRNAs under their supervision are responsible for the entire mess that threatens our specialty. I regularly post on Sermo in the Anesthesiology section the threat CRNAs pose and the inbounds they have made into our profession. Sad point is due to their infiltration into medicine, most of you will join groups where you are supervising them. Rationalize that… Or look for a physician only group, they are rare, but they are out there. Especially on the west coast.

[As an aside, for those of you who are MDs already, you should join Sermo.com as it is one of the only true advocacy organizations for physicians left. Physicians only and your licensure is checked at joining. Free. Not a CRNA or Nurse PhD to be seen… Anesthesia is not the only group under attack from nursing groups. Family practicioners lamenting NPs, the works. So give Sermo a look. The AMA is _not_ an advocacy group for physicians any longer and really sold us out during the Obama-care debacle. The ASA (specifically the ASAPAC) although it does _some_ good, isn’t doing enough to stem the tide of the CRNA onslaught. The inroads they are making in states all around the U.S. is the real hell. Unless that tide is stopped, we are all ascending to the giant flower in the sky. Believe it.]

To the second point, whether SRNAs being at Baylor affected my training. The answer is no. As Houston Dreaming posted, none of us residents liked that they were being trained there, but it really was a non-issue for my training. It did not make a “Huge deal” nor was it CRNA hell. Hell is when you supervise them when in private practice or when you read the daily updates about how they are trying to gain complete independence from physician supervision. But it didn’t impact my training one iota. The specialty rotations don’t have any SNRAs, so even better. Houstondreaming is still in training there and has no complaints apart from their presence. Take that information as you will. Great program. Wish there were no SRNAs…

But regardless, if you are interested in advocacy of our profession by members of our profession (Anesthesiology or another specialty), you owe it to yourself to check out Sermo.com. Cheers and goodluck.
 
Regional. Now here Baylor was/?is? weak. When I was there, we clamored for more regional training. We then set up a regional rotation, where you only put in blocks all day for a month. That was your job on that specialty rotation. No O.R. time. Nice improvement. But we aren't NYSORA when it comes to regional. Baylor regional - sufficient/good, not superb. May have changed an improved future, talk to the current residents…

Houstondreaming or any other baylor residents what to comment if the regional training has improved? What is it now?
 
Top