- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 0
hey. I've always wanted to become an emt. Does anyone know whats involved and how I can get into it. Thanks
juelz721 said:hey. I've always wanted to become an emt. Does anyone know whats involved and how I can get into it. Thanks
This is one route, going through companies like WMI or SOLO or UCLA's private program.Robizzle said:to be an EMT, you have to take a course. from what my friends told me, it's really cool but it's reeeally long. each class is about 4-5 hours and they meet like 4 days a week. i'm sure there are other schedules too. the course lasts about a month or so and at the end you take a few tests (not just 1) to become certified.
you also write a big fat check to them.
juelz721 said:hey. I've always wanted to become an emt. Does anyone know whats involved and how I can get into it. Thanks
juelz721 said:hey. I've always wanted to become an emt. Does anyone know whats involved and how I can get into it. Thanks
ADeadLois said:There is a perception that people do it simply for clinical experience on AMCAS,
BBAS, when you get on AIM, I will explain why it's a bad thing. It's kind of involved to explain on here and will side track this thread. If anyone else wants to know why, feel free to PM me and I will explain it.bbas said:What exactly is wrong with this? Obviously, no one should do any EC for the sole purpose of putting it on an application, but becoming an EMT seems like a great way to get clinical experience that you can't get by volunteering or shadowing.
The company I used is called link2life and is only in SoCal, but there must be others somewhere. It's a lot of material for just two weeks, but definately do-able.
Is there anywhere in the country that runs an EMT course longer than one semester? I did the standard semester course and found it to be plenty of time to cover the content, given the limited scope of an EMT's duties.DropkickMurphy said:IMHO, No one can become properly trained and experienced in 2 weeks, even a full semester is pushing it in many cases.
I'd vote against raising any quality standards raised until the pay issue is addressed. EMS is exploitive as it is in its pay standards for EMTs. The current 120 hour requirement is still a LOT of training for a near minimum pay job in many states.DropkickMurphy said:No, but, as a practicing EMS provider, I would like to see the requirements of EMS raised to help improve the quality of EMT's. Personally I think a very involved A+P course should be a prerequisite, to help weed out people before they get into a position where someone's life depends upon them.
Many junior college EMT courses (in California, anyway) require an A&P class with lab as a prerequisite.
DropkickMurphy said:As did the program I used to secondary instruct for.
The pay issue will not be resolved so long as there are people who are willing to do it for that low pay. It's basic supply and demand. The supply outstrips the demand in most major areas, therefore the pay stays low because the services now they can get away with it. This is another reason the rapid turnover- which in a lot of areas is fed by a steady supply of premeds (the last class I helped teach, by a show of hands, was 75% premeds).
The "quality standard" should come before anything else, because one of the major problems with EMS is that we get in such a hellbent rush to put staff on ambulances. We never give any thought to the reason WHY you have ambulances in the first place- to deliver effective and proper patient care. In many places this is still not being done.
ADeadLois said:A lot of hospitals and community college offer EMT certification classes.
Just a word of warning, a lot of people on this board are very touchy about people wanting to go into EMT training. There is a perception that people do it simply for clinical experience on AMCAS, despite the fact that there are people like yourself with a long-standing interest in being an EM. I've seen people get flamed to sand and sky for EMT stuff.[/Q
I'm not doing it just for the clinical experience, because it really is clinical experience i would enjoy. but what do you mean that people get "flamed" for doing it???? Thanks
juelz721 said:ADeadLois said:A lot of hospitals and community college offer EMT certification classes.
Just a word of warning, a lot of people on this board are very touchy about people wanting to go into EMT training. There is a perception that people do it simply for clinical experience on AMCAS, despite the fact that there are people like yourself with a long-standing interest in being an EM. I've seen people get flamed to sand and sky for EMT stuff.[/Q
I'm not doing it just for the clinical experience, because it really is clinical experience i would enjoy. but what do you mean that people get "flamed" for doing it???? Thanks
Flaming is an excessive amount of criticism for a post. I remember awhile back someone posting that they wanted to do EMT for clinical experience and about half a dozen posters shot the person down, including "I would never want you as my partner".
Hey there,
I was reading the EMT thread and was interested in your thoughts regarding people becoming EMTs to pad their AMCAS app. An obviously detrimental scenario would be an individual with no genuine interest in EM simply going through the motions so that they can write down "EMT" under clinical experience. However, while emergency medicine is unlikely to be the field I specialize in, I am interested in becoming an EMT to challenge myself and make sure I can handle the more difficult aspects of medicine. I will eagerly await your response. Thanks
DropkickMurphy said:I'm usually the one doing said flaming. Personally, as a former EMS supervisor and instructor, my beef is with those who have no interest in EMS, but are using it solely as a stepping stone with the full intention of flipping the bird to we EMS professionals (and I will remain an EMS professional after I obtain my MD/DO) as they go for a bigger paycheck.
The OP expressed an interest in EMS, therefore I have no beef with him/her. In fact, if I can be of assistance, feel free to PM me.
Yes, I do actually, but like it or not- unless something drastically changes which I don't see happening- fire = EMS in this nation in >80% of locations. Granted I think they should be seperate fields in an ideal world, bit just frankly don't see that as plausible or likely in this nation.Empress said:Do you have the same beef who just want EMT or paramedic so they can get hired onto a fire department? I do.
DropkickMurphy said:Yes, I do actually, but like it or not- unless something drastically changes which I don't see happening- fire = EMS in this nation in >80% of locations. Granted I think they should be seperate fields in an ideal world, bit just frankly don't see that as plausible or likely in this nation.
I will look around and see what I can find. I seem to recall a few articles stating that, but I have yet to see a scientific study of it so far. PM me if you would like to discuss that further. *hint, hint*Empress said:I agree, I think it should be seperated. My main problem is fire departments using the squad as a punishment area for new people or those out of favor, which makes for an EMT unit staffed by unwilling people who'd rather be somewhere else. But fire unions are older and much stronger to let a seperation ever happen, they need the money from the call volume.
I heard a rumor that one of the EMS magazines had an article of how fire department are not doing a good job compared to third party, or was I just imagining it?
Point of view, I guess. One of the reasons that EM is such a popular field is the hours and it being lifestyle-compatible. Nice long shifts, little to no call, and few days each week. Give me a few missed Christmases and Thanksgivings as an EM doc above a family practice lifestyle anyday.DropkickMurphy said:By the way, go work a few years in EMS and tell me if you think the hours are "nice". That's one of the reasons I only do it as a volunteer now.
Kelly schedules suck.....at least when you do lots of calls at night, as is common around her because you often spend that first day off sleeping. Granted I'd rather do that than do 8 hr days (which would probably make me blow my brains out if I had to do it for more than a few months....I'm not a daytime person ). Still.....I'd rather do three 12hrs, four off, four on three off which was my full time schedule as an RT.notdeadyet said:Point of view, I guess. One of the reasons that EM is such a popular field is the hours and it being lifestyle-compatible. Nice long shifts, little to no call, and few days each week. Give me a few missed Christmases and Thanksgivings as an EM doc above a family practice lifestyle anyday.
Kelly shifts rock. And 24 hour shifts, 10 shifts per month? Way hard to beat. I'm surprised your group doesn't like it, Murph; everywhere I've seen that had it, loved it.
You ever want to start a riot with a county EMS? Try switching their shifts from 10 shifts monthly to five days/week. Half of Honolulu EMTs switched from City to AMR for just that reason.
Agreed. Anything other than five days. Too many...DropkickMurphy said:I'd rather do three 12hrs, four off, four on three off which was my full time schedule as an RT.