Behavioral science question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Phloston

Osaka, Japan
Removed
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
1,676
So let's say you've got a typical scenario of a mother who comes to the physician with her 8 and 15 year-old children. She insists on being present while both of the children are examined.

The best response by the physician is to tell the 15 year-old to wait outside while the 8 year-old is examined with the mother present. Then the 15 year-old should come in to be examined alone, and the 8 year-old and mother go wait outside. The 15 year-old should then be asked whether he or she would like the mother to be present.

I'm not confused about any of that.

Kaplan QBank, unrelated to the above scenario, had mentioned that in most states, children gain the rights of partial emancipation on their 15th birthday (i.e. confidential care for STDs, prenatal status, substance-abuse, birth control).

My question is at what age the child first needs to be examined away from the parent. Is it 15, given Kaplan's aforementioned point, or is it younger? Because IMO, I would think all teenagers should first be seen away from their parents for the sake of potential nascent social issues.
 
Have they started puberty? Do you think they're having sex? Do you think they're doing drugs? The entire point is to discuss sensitive issues in an environment that is more conductive to honest communication between the you and the patient. Age isn't as important as their behaviors or physical development. I don't think you're going to find a sharp dividing line that tells you what to do.
 
Top