Best Qbank software/site for STEP2

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dvirkk

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Sorry for re-posting this but the last thread is from 2009.

How about a poll? UW? KAPLAN? there are several other ones out there - any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
 
Has anybody tried Kaplan's Qbank? Also, do Qs on the real thing compare to Qs on UW or Kaplan (besides they are longer) ?
 
Has anybody tried Kaplan's Qbank? Also, do Qs on the real thing compare to Qs on UW or Kaplan (besides they are longer) ?

DIdnt even bother with Kaplan for Step 2, sorry bra, Uworld was pretty spot on. The quality, length, style, basically everything about Uworld questions are exactly like the real deal. When I sat for Step 2, it was like I was sitting at "just another UWorld Block"
 
UW for CK is SO good that it is essentially a stand alone resource for the exam (unlike for step 1). I haven't tried Kaplan but as others have said, it's hard to imagine a better question bank than World.
 
I used only UW qbank for Step 2 study. I scored in the 260s For reference, I got in the 250s on Step 1, and have completed all core clerkships and shelfs.
 
Last edited:
i think uw is loosing its weight and charm and kaplan is getting good day by day...kaplan covers all types of qs whereas uw covers difficult qs
 
i think uw is loosing its weight and charm and kaplan is getting good day by day...kaplan covers all types of qs whereas uw covers difficult qs

Judging by your responses in this and other threads, you work for Kaplan. Nice try, but UWorld is the alpha and omega of Step studying. Good luck being a shill, however.
 
Judging by your responses in this and other threads, you work for Kaplan. Nice try, but UWorld is the alpha and omega of Step studying. Good luck being a shill, however.

Good joke..am working for kaplan?..hahah...brother what i i meant to say is, for usmle step-1 exam uw and kaplanboth are equally good (relatively kaplan is getting good for step-1 and uw is stable in quality of qs)but for step-2 ck exam UW is the only option...For CS UW is good for tips and some cases are good but ultimate thing is FA for CS..In UW for CS ,videos are not perfect ...anyway thanks for nice joke today

we have nothing to do with uw and kaplan and usmlerx but ultimate thing is we should get benefit from Q banks ,it can be either uw or kaplan or rx..by the way am preparing for step-1 along with cs. I follow only uw for step-1 and FA and uw for cs ..For cs PE part am looking at all free samples over few websites and youtube...i saw qs of kaplan while my friend was doing..they are good for step-1 like uw but my target is first to prepare well with uw and later if time permits i will do few kaplan qs
 
Last edited:
As someone that has used both for both exams, Kaplan is in no way even close to the quality of UW. Maybe this has changed in the last year or two since I've taken step 1 and last few months since I took step 2, but from where I sat....UW is SIGNIFICANTLY better.
 
I did show the Kaplan QBank to a few of the doctors I work with.

They took it and they told me some of the questions were on the level of the specialty boards (IM boards, Peds boards, Surgical boards)

Because the level of clinical knowledge needed was that vast.

Specifically, I am not talking about "wierd and bizarre syndromes"

Rather, the harder Kaplan questions have similar answer choices revolving around several similar differential diagnoses. TO obtain the correct answer, you have to recognize the "clinical subtlety and distinctions" in order to make the right choice.

Plus there is some dosing, treatment length, and calculation of fluid volumes.


Only bother with Kaplan if you A) have the cash B) have the time C) have the willpower D) want to know a lot of ticky tack little things that may help you survive pimping on the wards (it certainly helped me... my general surgeon said I was the first student of his to ever correctly answer Mirizzi syndrome)



An example of a typical Kaplan trap and wordplay laden question:

Start off by describing possible bacterial gastroenteritis of an American traveling in Mexico.. given "suspicious antibiotics"... developed vague upper abdominal pain ... crashed her car while she was doing this... was "treated adequately" and went back to the united states... a few weeks later, developed intense epigastric pain... what is the treatment?

they wanted you to answer "endoscopic anastomosis" (cystogastrotomy) to drain a pancreatic pseudocyst
 
Last edited:
I did show the Kaplan QBank to a few of the doctors I work with.

They took it and they told me some of the questions were on the level of the specialty boards (IM boards, Peds boards, Surgical boards)

Because the level of clinical knowledge needed was that vast.

Specifically, I am not talking about "wierd and bizarre syndromes"

Rather, the harder Kaplan questions have similar answer choices revolving around several similar differential diagnoses. TO obtain the correct answer, you have to recognize the "clinical subtlety and distinctions" in order to make the right choice.

Plus there is some dosing, treatment length, and calculation of fluid volumes.


Only bother with Kaplan if you A) have the cash B) have the time C) have the willpower D) want to know a lot of ticky tack little things that may help you survive pimping on the wards (it certainly helped me... my general surgeon said I was the first student of his to ever correctly answer Mirizzi syndrome)



An example of a typical Kaplan trap and wordplay laden question:

Start off by describing possible bacterial gastroenteritis of an American traveling in Mexico.. given "suspicious antibiotics"... developed vague upper abdominal pain ... crashed her car while she was doing this... was "treated adequately" and went back to the united states... a few weeks later, developed intense epigastric pain... what is the treatment?

they wanted you to answer "endoscopic anastomosis" (cystogastrotomy) to drain a pancreatic pseudocyst

This is exactly why Kaplan is not the best Qbank. Step 2 CK is far less about knowing "ticky tack" facts, and more relies on the test taker being able to apply general clinical knowledge in a variety of settings.

Yes, there will be some specific fact related questions, but I found that most of these questions were not of the "Mirizzi Syndrome" variety. They were on common clinical diagnoses, but required you to know a specific point regarding the pathology or treatment.
 
Another poorly written Kaplan question:


Young man with a solid testicular mass. What is the next best step? (no qualifier on whether it is next best step in management, best step in treatment, etc...)

you could choose measure serum hCG and AFP levels (which is routinely done pre-op but has no real therapeutic value because of the following)

or you could choose radical orchiectomy..

Seeing as how most testicular masses are malignant, it is indeed true that biopsy takes place during the orchiectomy.


But the question did not qualify what "next best step" would be...

Literally, you get serum markers preop.. so that would be the next step...


but they wanted you to answer radical orchiectomy (not a bad choice as it hits the concept well)

but overall just a vague and poorly written question again
 
I used kaplan for studying for the shelf exams and have found it pretty helpful for that. I think It is *much* cheaper than uworld if you are getting it for more than a few months. I did all of the medicine questions during my medicine clerkship and got 99th percentile.

I'll probably buy uworld when i actually buckle down to study for the cs though.

I guess it just depends how many questions you want to do.
 
Top