Big Beautiful Bill: Implications for Pain...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
i guess left leaning means empathy and kindness, and right leaning means, racist
ironically im right leaning and conservative (despite overt racism due to my skin color towards me), but believe that values like empathy and kindness transcend any political spectrum, however as recent policies have shown, our country is losing its way and treating humans like animals and the world as a whole is returning to caging people just like the good 'ol days
If you stop consuming MSM and instead go to church, the belly of the beast of conservative racists, you might be pleasantly surprised.
 
Again I’m not sure how enforcing work requirements for able bodied individuals is a bad thing. It’s astonishing that Medicaid pays for 40% of all births. Again the inclusion criteria are far too broad. That’s an excellent way to bankrupt a country and it seems to be working. I believe in giving a hand up, not a hand out.

Plus work is actually beneficial for those that are not truly disabled. Work provides numerous benefits, including financial stability, improved mental and physical health, a sense of purpose, and opportunities for social interaction. It also contributes to personal growth, skill development, and a stronger sense of community.




The stated purpose of the big ugly bill is to get near 1 trillion out of Medicaid.

I think you know that this requires more than just work requirement. The vast majority are already working.
 
If you stop consuming MSM and instead go to church, the belly of the beast of conservative racists, you might be pleasantly surprised.
your statement doesn't make sense. On one hand you admit that they are racist, whilst trying to imply they aren't. Also, i dont consume MSM, ever since they all perpetrated the lie of WMD in iraq
 
If you stop consuming MSM and instead go to church, the belly of the beast of conservative racists, you might be pleasantly surprised.
You cant say that you are Christian and cut 1 trillion off of Medicaid just to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion to process a tax refund.

One of the most egregious examples of reverse Robin Hood that I have seen. They all know its wrong too...
 
You cant say that you are Christian and cut 1 trillion off of Medicaid just to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion to process a tax refund.

One of the most egregious examples of reverse Robin Hood that I have seen. They all know its wrong too...
Well I'm not Christian or Republican but trust Christianity to do good 100x more than Democrat politicians, or Republican politicians for that matter. You're free to disagree and put your faith in politicians but that's not the traditional spirit of America by any stretch.
 
Well I'm not Christian or Republican but trust Christianity to do good 100x more than Democrat politicians, or Republican politicians for that matter. You're free to disagree and put your faith in politicians but that's not the traditional spirit of America by any stretch.
I only brought in religion in response to below.

I really do think that faith and politics should be separate but as Christians we are only asked to love Jesus with all our heart and sole and to love our neighbor. Not to judge but cutting the poor including things like SNAP and global US AID just to raise the debt ceiling is not loving our neighbors.

We are asked to help all of those in need, not just Americans.

If you stop consuming MSM and instead go to church, the belly of the beast of conservative racists, you might be pleasantly surprised.
 
The stated purpose of the big ugly bill is to get near 1 trillion out of Medicaid.

I think you know that this requires more than just work requirement. The vast majority are already working.
I had asked you in a prior post what specifically was in the bill that was negative for Medicaid patients other than the work requirements. Instead of answering the question you attached some article describing all the presumably negative effects of the coming “Medicaid cuts”

Nowhere in your response did you answer the question. From my own research I determined that there will also be more frequent eligibility checks which again shouldn’t be a problem for people that are truly eligible. But other than that, what else do you not like about the Medicaid portion of the bill? I’m honestly trying to understand your concern
 
Last edited:
I had asked you in a prior post what specifically was in the bill that was negative for Medicaid patients other than the work requirements. Instead of answering the question you attached some article describing all the presumably negative effects of the coming “Medicaid cuts”

Nowhere in your response did you answer the question. From my own research I determined that there will also be more frequent eligibility checks which again shouldn’t be a problem for people that are truly eligible. But other than that, what else do you not like about the Medicaid portion of the bill? I’m honestly trying to understand your concern
Whether frequent eligibility checks cause people to lose coverage depends on how those occur. Understaffed or unstaffed phone support, long lines at in-person centers, and long cumbersome forms built like insurance prior auth rules to trip you up absolutely will cause problems. If it’s a simple process where you can snap a picture of your paystub or something and upload it that should be fine.
 
Whether frequent eligibility checks cause people to lose coverage depends on how those occur. Understaffed or unstaffed phone support, long lines at in-person centers, and long cumbersome forms built like insurance prior auth rules to trip you up absolutely will cause problems. If it’s a simple process where you can snap a picture of your paystub or something and upload it that should be fine.
It is the government so I’m sure it’ll be run like the dmv
 
Whether frequent eligibility checks cause people to lose coverage depends on how those occur. Understaffed or unstaffed phone support, long lines at in-person centers, and long cumbersome forms built like insurance prior auth rules to trip you up absolutely will cause problems. If it’s a simple process where you can snap a picture of your paystub or something and upload it that should be fine.
Aside from paperwork and lines, are you worried about people being sicker and dying in your town?
 
Last edited:
This is exactly on point. @mille125

If $14 billion in Medicaid fraud doesn’t piss you off, you’re in on the grift.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐀𝐛𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜

While Democrats perform their ritualistic theater about Republicans “kicking millions off Medicaid,” the government just casually admitted to running what amounts to a $14 billion annual ghost town:

• 2.8 million Americans are double-dipping on taxpayer-funded health plans

• $14 billion flows annually to phantom patients, people who moved to Florida, died, or exist only in the fevered dreams of hospital billing departments

• Insurers cash checks for members who haven’t seen a doctor since Obama’s first term

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠 𝐌𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

This isn’t bureaucratic bumbling, it’s the system working exactly as designed. Like a Rory Sutherland thought experiment gone horribly wrong, we’ve created perverse incentives that reward failure:

• Biden’s team banned states from checking eligibility more than once yearly (because apparently, people’s circumstances never change)

• ObamaCare exchanges operate in blissful ignorance of Medicaid rolls, like two drunk accountants at separate bars

• “Nonprofit” hospital systems—those charitable bastions of community health—are getting rich off invisible patients

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞

Here’s where human psychology gets delicious: The GOP’s modest proposal to verify eligibility twice a year and use existing address data has triggered a meltdown that would make a toddler proud.

Hospital executives and insurance lobbyists are shrieking like their cocaine has been cut with actual medicine.

Why?
𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘢 $14 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘵 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘱𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐢𝐛𝐛𝐢 𝐅𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲

This is the part nobody mentions at Georgetown dinner parties: American healthcare isn’t broken, it’s a perfectly calibrated wealth extraction machine.

Every phantom dollar flowing to ghost patients is a dollar not treating real humans with actual medical needs.

We’ve built a system where the incentive is to not verify eligibility,
not coordinate care,
and definitely not ask too many questions about where the money goes.

It’s genius, really.

Bureaucratic theater that makes everyone look compassionate while the meter keeps running.
 
This is exactly on point. @mille125

If $14 billion in Medicaid fraud doesn’t piss you off, you’re in on the grift.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐀𝐛𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜

While Democrats perform their ritualistic theater about Republicans “kicking millions off Medicaid,” the government just casually admitted to running what amounts to a $14 billion annual ghost town:

• 2.8 million Americans are double-dipping on taxpayer-funded health plans

• $14 billion flows annually to phantom patients, people who moved to Florida, died, or exist only in the fevered dreams of hospital billing departments

• Insurers cash checks for members who haven’t seen a doctor since Obama’s first term

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠 𝐌𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

This isn’t bureaucratic bumbling, it’s the system working exactly as designed. Like a Rory Sutherland thought experiment gone horribly wrong, we’ve created perverse incentives that reward failure:

• Biden’s team banned states from checking eligibility more than once yearly (because apparently, people’s circumstances never change)

• ObamaCare exchanges operate in blissful ignorance of Medicaid rolls, like two drunk accountants at separate bars

• “Nonprofit” hospital systems—those charitable bastions of community health—are getting rich off invisible patients

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞

Here’s where human psychology gets delicious: The GOP’s modest proposal to verify eligibility twice a year and use existing address data has triggered a meltdown that would make a toddler proud.

Hospital executives and insurance lobbyists are shrieking like their cocaine has been cut with actual medicine.

Why?
𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘢 $14 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘵 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘱𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐢𝐛𝐛𝐢 𝐅𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲

This is the part nobody mentions at Georgetown dinner parties: American healthcare isn’t broken, it’s a perfectly calibrated wealth extraction machine.

Every phantom dollar flowing to ghost patients is a dollar not treating real humans with actual medical needs.

We’ve built a system where the incentive is to not verify eligibility,
not coordinate care,
and definitely not ask too many questions about where the money goes.

It’s genius, really.

Bureaucratic theater that makes everyone look compassionate while the meter keeps running.
again, please cite the reference. looks like it is from matt taibbi, who has been drifting towards conspiracy theorist for upwards of a decade now.
 
again, please cite the reference. looks like it is from matt taibbi, who has been drifting towards conspiracy theorist for upwards of a decade now.
You do realize it’s impossible to have an intelligent discussion with anyone who consistently cite their left leaning sources as dogma but discredit all opposing sources as right wing conspiracy theories. I enjoy lively educated debate but you sir are an intellectual sloth
 
You do realize it’s impossible to have an intelligent discussion with anyone who consistently cite their left leaning sources as dogma but discredit all opposing sources as right wing conspiracy theories. I enjoy lively educated debate but you sir are an intellectual sloth
the difference is that is ALWAYS include the reference (some of which may be left-leaning), i dont just copy and paste text or spam memes.

if i am an intellectual sloth, and im not really sure what that means, then you are an intellectual dung beetle
 
Top