Bill Progrsssing in PA that would prohibit psychologists from supervisings SWs

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

edieb

Senior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
77
If you live in Pennsylvania, or have colleagues that reside there, please send them this link: http://capwiz.com/apapractice/issues/alert/?alertid=14198531 that will enable them to contact their legislators to oppose this act. If this passes, it will set a bad precedent for psychologists' scope of practice. Also, if you are a member of any psych listserves, please forward this onto them


Effort to Amend PA Professional Psychologists Practice Act


We are writing to urge you to write to your state representative asking them to strongly oppose HB 1250, which would restrict the practice of psychologists in Pennsylvania. Although this is ostensibly a bill to modify the act that licenses social workers, professional counselors, and marriage and family therapists, it has language that would restrict the current practice of psychology in Pennsylvania. Our efforts to persuade the advocates to back away from the Professional Psychologists Practice Act have failed and we must fight this bill in the House Professional Licensure Committee.

Here are two of our major concerns with this bill:

1. Under this bill, as the current social work-supported amendment reads, psychologists would not be permitted to supervise anyone unless that person were receiving the supervision to become a licensed psychologist. Therefore, psychologists would not be able to supervise persons with graduate training in psychology, as currently permitted in the Professional Psychologists Practice Act, nor would psychologists be permitted to supervise individuals who are licensed in other professions.

According to the way the bill is currently written, even psychologists-in-training would have to resign their positions and provide no psychological services from the time that they have completed their post-doctoral hours until the time they have received a notice that they have passed the licensing examination and can become licensed.

2. The current exemptions to the Professional Psychologists Practice Act are not, in our opinion, adequately protected by this bill. For example, psychologists who are licensed in other states and who practice here temporarily, such as providing a forensic evaluation or entering the state to provide services in the event of a disaster, would no longer be permitted to do so.

Please write to your state Representative and express your opposition to House Bill 1250, unless it is substantially amended to address the concerns of the Pennsylvania Psychological Association.
 
Last edited:
please help me understand why you titled your thread as you did when the text you posted actually concerns psychologist-in-training licensing issues as a significant concern. nowhere in there does it indicate that psychologists are wanting to supervise social workers, or wanting to stop supervising social workers. yes, it looks like the bill would make psychologists' lives quite difficult, but the thread title is misleading in regards to the actual issue at hand.
 
please help me understand why you titled your thread as you did when the text you posted actually concerns psychologist-in-training licensing issues as a significant concern. nowhere in there does it indicate that psychologists are wanting to supervise social workers, or wanting to stop supervising social workers. yes, it looks like the bill would make psychologists' lives quite difficult, but the thread title is misleading in regards to the actual issue at hand.



You need to read the text of the posting again, directly from point #1: nor would psychologists be permitted to supervise individuals who are licensed in other professions
 
Is this intentional, do they think, or just a result of bad wording?
 
Is this intentional, do they think, or just a result of bad wording?



The person who sent this to me said it was intentional as SWs want independent testing and diagnostic rights. This bill would eliminate the need for psychologists in many supervisory roles (prisons, hospitals) and enable these facilities to hire master's level persons in PhDs' place. Please pass the word on
 
You need to read the text of the posting again, directly from point #1: nor would psychologists be permitted to supervise individuals who are licensed in other professions
my eyes and my reading comprehension are just fine, thanks. again, I can sympathize with making supervision of psychologists-in-training prohibitive and can understand rewording the bill for that reason. however, I'm still unclear as to why psychologists would want to supervise other professions for licensure given the differences in training and philosophy. this is clearly in relation to licensure supervision, not workplace supervision. it is bizarre to me that PA's social work board even allows MSWs to be supervised by anyone other than a LCSW (yes, I checked). that's a major exception to the rule nationwide.
 
Top