-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bio question
Started by Psa
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Yes that's correct. Can you explain this to me? If the niche is not exactly the same but "similar", shouldn't the answer be C? Can't two species have similar niche but compete for different resources?
Yes that's correct. Can you explain this to me? If the niche is not exactly the same but "similar", shouldn't the answer be C? Can't two species have similar niche but compete for different resources?
It could be correct if it would have said "divergent" instead of "convergent". If they evolved with a convergent evolution, the niche overlap would be even worse.
But yes if they use different resources then the niche may eventually shift. Either that or their realized niches might grow.
Make sense? I think you may have just flipped convergent and divergent.
If two species have similar niches (similar resources in a given environment), then you would expect the two species to have an overlap of competing against the same resources. Thus, the resource would be limited.
What you are thinking is probably realized niche, where the organism would have to incorporate with the other organism in a similar niche. In that way, it would still be divergent just because it is coming from an ancestral, and the environment changes their beak size perhaps if they were competing against different seed size.
What you are thinking is probably realized niche, where the organism would have to incorporate with the other organism in a similar niche. In that way, it would still be divergent just because it is coming from an ancestral, and the environment changes their beak size perhaps if they were competing against different seed size.
It could be correct if it would have said "divergent" instead of "convergent". If they evolved with a convergent evolution, the niche overlap would be even worse.
But yes if they use different resources then the niche may eventually shift. Either that or their realized niches might grow.
Make sense? I think you may have just flipped convergent and divergent.
Thanks. I was misinterpreting the definition of a niche.
Why is the assumption that the "similar niches" are in the same environment/habitat made? For example, if you interpreted the question to be 2 niches (in different environments), then couldn't it be convergent evolution (where they both evolve homologous structures to better adapt to the niche).