Passed both, sub-average but only by a little (simlar to ITEs)
Was pretty worried- similar to poster above I haven't been the best test taker throughout my life, and I went to a highly academic fellowship where I saw pretty esoteric stuff in a subspecialty so not much general exposure.
I used GW videos (interface sucked, but videos were ok), the ASH heme lectures (fantastic), and did >60% of the HOQ, ASH SEP and ASCO SAP questions.
I'm going to go against the grain a little here and say the HOQ by Ravin Garg were ok (Definitely worth the money), but by the time you do a bunch of them, you can kind of *tell* what is the right answer based on how the questions are framed/formatted, and not due to clinical knowledge- and the learning is somewhat esoteric sometimes. The explanations are good though. I didn't find them super representative of the boards questions, but the act of using them was helpful I guess.